Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Toran Proxy VS Private Packagist

Compare Toran Proxy VS Private Packagist and see what are their differences

Toran Proxy logo Toran Proxy

Toran acts as a proxy for Packagist, GitHub and other repositories.

Private Packagist logo Private Packagist

Composer package archive as a service for PHP
  • Toran Proxy Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-15
  • Private Packagist Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-22

Toran Proxy features and specs

  • Efficient Package Management
    Toran Proxy acts as a proxy server for Packagist, which helps in streamlining Composer operations by caching and managing PHP package dependencies efficiently.
  • Improves Performance
    By caching packages locally, Toran Proxy reduces the load time for package downloads and updates, leading to faster build and deployment processes in development environments.
  • Reduces Load on Packagist
    By acting as a proxy, it reduces the direct traffic to Packagist, thereby decreasing their bandwidth usage and promoting a more distributed network of clients.
  • Private Repositories
    It allows organizations to host private repositories alongside public ones, providing more control over access and distribution of proprietary code.
  • Network Independence
    Toran Proxy enables work in environments with limited or no direct internet access by providing cached packages and resolving dependencies locally.

Possible disadvantages of Toran Proxy

  • Setup and Maintenance Complexity
    Setting up and maintaining Toran Proxy requires additional infrastructure and ongoing management, which can be complex and time-consuming for teams without experience in managing local servers.
  • Cost Considerations
    Running Toran Proxy, especially if hosting private repositories, can incur additional costs associated with infrastructure and potential licensing or subscription fees.
  • Dependency on Local Proxy
    If the Toran Proxy server experiences downtime or configuration issues, it can interrupt the development workflow, as developers rely on it for package management.
  • Limited Use Cases
    For small projects or teams with minimal package management needs, the overhead of setting up a Toran Proxy might outweigh its benefits.

Private Packagist features and specs

  • Centralized Package Management
    Private Packagist offers a centralized platform to manage PHP dependencies, making it easier for organizations to control the distribution and versioning of their internal libraries and third-party packages.
  • Security
    By using Private Packagist, organizations can ensure that their packages are coming from a secure and trusted source, reducing the risk of using malicious or compromised packages from public repositories.
  • Access Control
    It allows users to assign access rights and roles to team members, which helps maintain security and ensures that only authorized personnel can manage and access specific packages.
  • Custom Domains
    Organizations can use custom domains for their private packages, helping in maintaining brand identity and allowing for easier package management within the company's ecosystem.
  • Integrated with Composer
    Private Packagist is natively integrated with Composer, the PHP dependency manager, ensuring seamless adoption and easy integration into existing workflows.

Possible disadvantages of Private Packagist

  • Cost
    Private Packagist is a paid service, which might not be ideal for smaller organizations or individual developers who have tight budget constraints.
  • Dependency on External Service
    Relying on a third-party service for package management means that any downtime or service interruptions could potentially impact development workflows.
  • Complex Setup
    Compared to using the default Composer setup, configuring and managing an additional platform might incur some initial complexity and a learning curve for development teams.
  • Limited to PHP
    Being a PHP-focused service, it is not suitable for projects that require management of dependencies for multiple programming languages outside the PHP ecosystem.

Toran Proxy videos

No Toran Proxy videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Private Packagist videos

Interview - Private Packagist Nils Adermann, Mathias Schreiber

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Toran Proxy and Private Packagist)
Developer Tools
46 46%
54% 54
Package Manager
36 36%
64% 64
Software Development
41 41%
59% 59
Sysadmin
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Toran Proxy and Private Packagist. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Private Packagist should be more popular than Toran Proxy. It has been mentiond 7 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Toran Proxy mentions (1)

Private Packagist mentions (7)

  • Private Packagist - has anyone used and can tell me if it might fit in my scenario?
    I was told in another forum to look at Private Packagist... But how is that different? Instead of installing packages from packagist.org.. You pay to Packagist.com to do the same thing? You just download from packagist.com cloud instead of packagist.org? Source: over 2 years ago
  • Need a secured way to be able to use Composer
    We have a private Satis instance. Our ITSec team reviews all packages before we add them to Satis. Packagist.com is available for us but the CI-CD servers can reach only the private Satis. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • Need a secured way to be able to use Composer
    Https://packagist.com maybe tell them about a local packagist install. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • Need a secured way to be able to use Composer
    "[MANAGER] requested this to be done in PHP. You as IT will know that most modern programming and scripting languages work only with packaging software properly. Composer sends requests (majority of cases) to packagist.com and to github.com. It will add thousands of hours to do everything that composer does manually. Please sign here to authorize the usage of 4000 hours and the possible delay of 4000 hours.... Source: almost 3 years ago
  • What do you think of SaaS Frameworks?
    Another downside that only really exists with non-PHP boilerplates is getting updates isn'T as easy. With PHP we're able to use packagist.com and make our code available via composer. Other languages don't have this so SaaS Pegasus provides zip downloads and Gravity provides access to a GitHub repo. This means you have to apply bug fixes yourself. With Parthenon, you do composer update and you'll get the latest... Source: almost 3 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Toran Proxy and Private Packagist, you can also consider the following products

Sonatype Nexus Repository - The world's only repository manager with FREE support for popular formats.

Satis - Satis is a simple static Composer repository generator

CloudRepo - Public and Private Maven and Python (PyPi) repository package manager.

Artifactory - The world’s most advanced repository manager.

ProGet - ProGet is a repository manager that allows you to host your own personal or enterprise-wide package...

Packagist - The PHP Package Repository