Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Satis VS Toran Proxy

Compare Satis VS Toran Proxy and see what are their differences

ASocks
Clear, Fast & Unlimited. Residential & Mobile Proxies For Best Price. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Satis logo Satis

Satis is a simple static Composer repository generator

Toran Proxy logo Toran Proxy

Toran acts as a proxy for Packagist, GitHub and other repositories.
  • Satis Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-11
  • Toran Proxy Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-15

Satis features and specs

  • Custom Repository Creation
    Satis allows you to create your own Composer repositories, which can host private or customized packages. This is useful for internal company projects or any situation where you want more control over the packages you use.
  • Simple Setup
    Satis is relatively straightforward to set up and requires minimal configuration. This simplicity makes it accessible for teams without a dedicated DevOps department.
  • Lightweight
    Being a simple PHP static file generator, Satis is lightweight and doesn’t require a large resource overhead to operate, making it efficient for smaller projects or limited server environments.
  • Secure Private Packages
    Satis allows for the secure hosting of private packages, ensuring that internal or proprietary code is not exposed to the public and can be shared safely within an organization.
  • Composer Compatibility
    Satis is fully compatible with Composer, ensuring that developers can seamlessly integrate it into their existing workflow without requiring significant changes or adaptations.

Possible disadvantages of Satis

  • Limited Feature Set
    Satis is primarily a static file generator and does not offer advanced features such as package search, browsing, or user interfaces that more robust solutions might provide.
  • Manual Updates
    Packages hosted on a Satis repository do not update automatically; it requires manual intervention to update the package listings whenever changes are made to the source packages.
  • No Dependency Management
    Satis itself does not handle dependency management; it relies on Composer for that functionality. Satis is only for repository management, which might not suit all project needs.
  • Limited Scalability
    While lightweight, Satis might not be ideal for large-scale operations or gigantic repositories with many dependencies and packages, as it doesn't inherently support scaling or load balancing mechanisms.
  • Lack of User Management
    Satis does not offer built-in user management functionality, which means that any access restrictions or permissions need to be handled externally, potentially complicating integration with other systems.

Toran Proxy features and specs

  • Efficient Package Management
    Toran Proxy acts as a proxy server for Packagist, which helps in streamlining Composer operations by caching and managing PHP package dependencies efficiently.
  • Improves Performance
    By caching packages locally, Toran Proxy reduces the load time for package downloads and updates, leading to faster build and deployment processes in development environments.
  • Reduces Load on Packagist
    By acting as a proxy, it reduces the direct traffic to Packagist, thereby decreasing their bandwidth usage and promoting a more distributed network of clients.
  • Private Repositories
    It allows organizations to host private repositories alongside public ones, providing more control over access and distribution of proprietary code.
  • Network Independence
    Toran Proxy enables work in environments with limited or no direct internet access by providing cached packages and resolving dependencies locally.

Possible disadvantages of Toran Proxy

  • Setup and Maintenance Complexity
    Setting up and maintaining Toran Proxy requires additional infrastructure and ongoing management, which can be complex and time-consuming for teams without experience in managing local servers.
  • Cost Considerations
    Running Toran Proxy, especially if hosting private repositories, can incur additional costs associated with infrastructure and potential licensing or subscription fees.
  • Dependency on Local Proxy
    If the Toran Proxy server experiences downtime or configuration issues, it can interrupt the development workflow, as developers rely on it for package management.
  • Limited Use Cases
    For small projects or teams with minimal package management needs, the overhead of setting up a Toran Proxy might outweigh its benefits.

Satis videos

+ Add

2002 Renault Vel Satis 3.5 V6 Initiale Road Test & Review - Matty's Cars

More videos:

  • Review - Renault Vel Satis 3.0 dCi (2006) - Eine echte Staatskarosse? | Test & Review
  • Review - Renault Vel Satis Road Test - it's HUUUUGE!

Toran Proxy videos

No Toran Proxy videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Satis and Toran Proxy)

Satis

Toran Proxy

Package Manager
63 63%
Package Manager
37% 37
Developer Tools
57 57%
Developer Tools
43% 43
Software Development
63 63%
Software Development
37% 37
Code Collaboration
100 100%
Code Collaboration
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Satis and Toran Proxy. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Satis should be more popular than Toran Proxy. It has been mentiond 5 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Satis mentions (5)

  • Need help with Installing Enlightn Pro
    Note: Satis is a local repo repository — the pro code is likely not on github. They set up their own system to handle these repositories outside of github/packagist. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Private Packagist - has anyone used and can tell me if it might fit in my scenario?
    If you want/need to self-host this internally, you can look at satis to create and self-host a repository. Since you need to add the packages manually, your security team can vet the code before adding it. There is a post on gitconnected on how to set this up: https://levelup.gitconnected.com/how-to-host-your-own-private-packagist-for-free-or-extremely-cheap-faf44eca3647. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Need a secured way to be able to use Composer
    We have a private Satis instance. Our ITSec team reviews all packages before we add them to Satis. Packagist.com is available for us but the CI-CD servers can reach only the private Satis. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • My own CMS/Tool - what is the best way to go about the usage in different projects?
    My team and I use Satis to accomplish that. It's hosted on our servers and we can easily release new versions. Dependabot can even upgrade the dependencies if new ones are detected. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • Do you use a private composer registry ? (Why / Why Not)
    Composer supports multiple types of custom respositories, so you can host your own repository (with something like Satis), pay for a packagist.com private repository or even use a VCS repository to fetch packages directly from your private GIT repos. Source: about 3 years ago

Toran Proxy mentions (1)

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Satis and Toran Proxy, you can also consider the following products

Sonatype Nexus Repository - The world's only repository manager with FREE support for popular formats.

Private Packagist - Composer package archive as a service for PHP

ProGet - ProGet is a repository manager that allows you to host your own personal or enterprise-wide package...

CloudRepo - Public and Private Maven and Python (PyPi) repository package manager.

Artifactory - The world’s most advanced repository manager.

Docker Registry 2.0 - Barebones but complete registry implementation for self-hosting.

Loading...