The Factual helps people find unbiased news on trending news topics. It applies a machine learning engine to transparently rate 10,000+ articles/day and curates the most credible stories across the political spectrum. The Factual's email newsletter and website are growing fast with strong engagement and retention. The two co-founders are from Stanford and IIT-Madras, and have raised pre-seed funding from Defy Ventures.
Based on our record, Securing Democracy should be more popular than The Factual. It has been mentiond 15 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
From the site, thefactual.com, MSNBC's credibility, or factual rating, ranks them in the 17th percentile. That means that MSNBC is less factual than 83% of the other news sources presented in the dataset. CNN is in the 15th percentile. Fox News sits right in the middle of these two in the 16th percentile. Source: about 1 year ago
According to thefactual.com, CNN received a Factual Grade of 53.3%, placing it in the 15th percentile. Fox News received a Factual Grade of 53.6%, placing it in the 16th percentile. Both are shitty, but according to this analysis, Fox News is marginally higher. MSNBC received a Factual Grade of 54.9%, placing it in the 17th percentile. You are a Dunning-Kruger ignoramus. Source: over 1 year ago
We also have a newsletter focused on credible news at thefactual.com, and we'd be happy to swab feedback! Source: almost 3 years ago
> Moreover investment of time on user side for newsletter delivering news increases with each newsletter vs One newsletter delivering what I want. You might be interested in this article[1] and the discussion of subscribed vs. Filtered sources. It'd be nice to have a convenient way to assign different priorities to newsletters/content sources. So for a few, you'd get every issue, and for the rest, they'd be... - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago
Hi there, yes, we're planning a follow-up discussion for this week! Follow us via email at thefactual.com, or social media @thefactualnews and we'll keep you updated on the upcoming discussion. Our previous one did well, and we tackled multiple perspectives with data. We hope you can join the next one! Source: about 3 years ago
That's it. That's the entirety of it. It's internal emails from Twitter employees accusing the Hamilton dashboard of falsely labeling conservative Twitter posters as Russian bots. Source: over 1 year ago
Going to the "Dashboard" .... https://securingdemocracy.gmfus.org/hamilton-dashboard/ Actually reading what it has to say .... "It would therefore be INCORRECT to, without further analysis, label anyone or anything that appears on the dashboard as being connected to state-backed propaganda." Conclusion: - Matt Taibbi clearly does not understand what this dash board does and is likely sensationalizing his... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
Https://securingdemocracy.gmfus.org/hamilton-dashboard/. (click on the 'Accounts' button). - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
I think you missed the point. Various democrats and media outlets [1] [2] were claiming that #releasethememo was being driven by Russian bots. In other words, it was not organic. Most of these outlets used the findings of ASD/Hamilton 68 for their articles. Source: over 1 year ago
I also like to see the data driven strategy for seeing the propaganda here: https://securingdemocracy.gmfus.org/hamilton-dashboard/. Source: over 1 year ago
Fact Check by Google - Google fights fake news in search with 'fact check'
Stop The Bullshit - Hide posts & block sites that publish fake news on Facebook
Ground News Pro - Platform to compare news sources covering the same issue
This is Clickbait - Detects Facebook posts as clickbait using deep learning
Partial Press - Breaking news according to political bias 🗞
InVID - Tool to verify content on social networks