Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

The Factual VS Fact Check by Google

Compare The Factual VS Fact Check by Google and see what are their differences

The Factual logo The Factual

Hottest news topics, most credible stories

Fact Check by Google logo Fact Check by Google

Google fights fake news in search with 'fact check'
  • The Factual Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-09-09

The Factual helps people find unbiased news on trending news topics. It applies a machine learning engine to transparently rate 10,000+ articles/day and curates the most credible stories across the political spectrum. The Factual's email newsletter and website are growing fast with strong engagement and retention. The two co-founders are from Stanford and IIT-Madras, and have raised pre-seed funding from Defy Ventures.

  • Fact Check by Google Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-01-08

The Factual features and specs

  • Objective Scoring
    The Factual uses an algorithm to score news articles based on transparency, diversity of sources, writing tone, and the expertise of the author. This scoring aims to provide readers with a more objective assessment of the news content.
  • Source Diversity
    The platform aggregates news from a wide array of sources, promoting balanced viewpoints by showcasing articles from different sides of the political spectrum.
  • Subscription Options
    The Factual offers both free and premium subscription models, allowing users to access basic scoring features without cost while offering enhanced services for subscribers.
  • Newsletter Format
    Users receive a daily newsletter summarizing top stories with high factual scores, making it easier for users to stay informed without spending extensive time searching for reliable news.

Possible disadvantages of The Factual

  • Scoring Limitations
    The algorithmic scoring method may not capture the full context or nuances of news articles, potentially leading to oversimplified evaluations.
  • Premium Content Restrictions
    Some features and detailed analyses are behind a paywall, which could limit access for users not willing to pay for a subscription.
  • Over-Reliance on Algorithm
    There may be concerns about depending too heavily on automated scoring, which could miss subjective human elements or biases present in journalism.
  • Content Availability
    Depending on the range of sources indexed by The Factual, some niche or less popular viewpoints might be underrepresented, affecting the diversity of content.

Fact Check by Google features and specs

  • Increased Access to Verified Information
    Google Fact Check helps users access information that has been verified by fact-checkers, which can lead to a more informed public.
  • Combat False Information
    By providing fact-checking labels, Google aims to combat the spread of false information online.
  • Global Reach
    The tool is available worldwide, enabling people from different regions to benefit from access to fact-checked information.
  • Encourages Credible Sources
    The presence of fact-checking might encourage publishers to maintain credibility and accuracy in their reporting.

Possible disadvantages of Fact Check by Google

  • Reliance on Fact-Checking Organizations
    The effectiveness of Google's Fact Check depends on the reliability and biases of the fact-checking organizations they partner with.
  • May Not Cover All Topics
    Not every claim or piece of information can be checked, potentially leaving gaps in coverage.
  • Subjectivity and Bias
    Fact-checking itself can carry biases, as different organizations may have varying standards and determination of 'truth.'
  • Impact on Free Speech
    Some critics argue that fact-checking may inadvertently influence or restrict free speech by labeling information with official 'truth' labels.

The Factual videos

The Factual News Quick Review (from Episode 5)

More videos:

  • Review - INS Rajput || Indian Navy Destroyers || The Factual

Fact Check by Google videos

No Fact Check by Google videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to The Factual and Fact Check by Google)
News
45 45%
55% 55
Chrome Extensions
46 46%
54% 54
Safari Extensions
52 52%
48% 48
Tech
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using The Factual and Fact Check by Google. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, The Factual seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 5 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

The Factual mentions (5)

  • Sam on Tucker Carlson and why left-wing media is the only legitimate news source: "The only legitimate media, for the most part, is left-wing media ... Breitbart and Fox are not journalism ... I care about them as destructive forces in our society; they're pseudo media."
    From the site, thefactual.com, MSNBC's credibility, or factual rating, ranks them in the 17th percentile. That means that MSNBC is less factual than 83% of the other news sources presented in the dataset. CNN is in the 15th percentile. Fox News sits right in the middle of these two in the 16th percentile. Source: about 2 years ago
  • A rebel disrupted The View today, interrupting climate-denying guest Ted Cruz.
    According to thefactual.com, CNN received a Factual Grade of 53.3%, placing it in the 15th percentile. Fox News received a Factual Grade of 53.6%, placing it in the 16th percentile. Both are shitty, but according to this analysis, Fox News is marginally higher. MSNBC received a Factual Grade of 54.9%, placing it in the 17th percentile. You are a Dunning-Kruger ignoramus. Source: over 2 years ago
  • How do I grow my blog newsletter subscriptions?
    We also have a newsletter focused on credible news at thefactual.com, and we'd be happy to swab feedback! Source: almost 4 years ago
  • Show HN: The Sample – newsletters curated for you with machine learning
    > Moreover investment of time on user side for newsletter delivering news increases with each newsletter vs One newsletter delivering what I want. You might be interested in this article[1] and the discussion of subscribed vs. Filtered sources. It'd be nice to have a convenient way to assign different priorities to newsletters/content sources. So for a few, you'd get every issue, and for the rest, they'd be... - Source: Hacker News / almost 4 years ago
  • What's behind the rise in anti-Asian hate crime? Join us on Clubhouse today!
    Hi there, yes, we're planning a follow-up discussion for this week! Follow us via email at thefactual.com, or social media @thefactualnews and we'll keep you updated on the upcoming discussion. Our previous one did well, and we tackled multiple perspectives with data. We hope you can join the next one! Source: about 4 years ago

Fact Check by Google mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Fact Check by Google yet. Tracking of Fact Check by Google recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing The Factual and Fact Check by Google, you can also consider the following products

Partial Press - Breaking news according to political bias 🗞

Ground News Pro - Platform to compare news sources covering the same issue

Credder - Rotten Tomatoes for news

Ground News Bias Checker - Browser extension which exposes media bias as you browse.

Metafact - Verify facts with the world's scientists

ArticleFinder - Find different view points of the same story