Sysdig Falco VS ROOK
Compare Sysdig Falco VS ROOK and see what are their differences
1Password can create strong, unique passwords for you, remember them, and restore them, all directly in your web browser.
featured
Sysdig Falco
tracee
CrowdStrike Falcon
Check Point Endpoint Security
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
NeuVector
Kubescape
Panoptica
ROOK
Minio
Ceph
Openstack Swift
Amazon Simple Storage Service (S3)
GlusterFS
Azure Blob Storage
Google Cloud Storage
Sysdig FalcoNo Sysdig Falco videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
Based on our record, ROOK should be more popular than Sysdig Falco. It has been mentiond 23 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
From one noob to another - I had a lot of fun setting up Falco (https://falco.org) and creating custom policies & alerts. Source: 11 months ago
Falco is a well-known open source security solution originally created by Sysdig. It’s a CNCF incubating project and one of the few (as far as I can tell) options on this list that uses eBPF to scan for vulnerabilities. - Source: dev.to / almost 1 year ago
Use some kind of SIEM or Falco to alert you to threats (you can't stop them, but a human can always intervene). Source: about 1 year ago
Falco, is a security project that can help you detect threats from within your cluster. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
Https://falco.org/ is a security-focused monitoring and alerting with an eBPF option. Source: over 1 year ago
I have some experience with Ceph, both for work, and with homelab-y stuff. First, bear in mind that Ceph is a distributed storage system - so the idea is that you will have multiple nodes. For learning, you can definitely virtualise it all on a single box - but you'll have a better time with discrete physical machines. Also, Ceph does prefer physical access to disks (similar to ZFS). And you do need decent... - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
Another option is to leverage a Kubernetes-native distributed storage solution such as Rook Ceph as the storage backend for stateful components running on Kubernetes. This has the benefit of simplifying application configuration while addressing business requirements for data backup and recovery such as the ability to take volume snapshots at a regular interval and perform application-level data recovery in case... - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
This is beyond your question but might help someone else: I switch from docker-compose to kubernetes for my home lab a while ago. The storage solution I've settled on is Rook. It was a bit of up-front work learning how to get it up but now that it's done my storage is automatically managed by Ceph. I can swap out drives and Ceph basically takes care of everything itself. Source: 11 months ago
The stumbling point I am at is I want to use rook.io(Ceph) as my storage solution for the cluster. The Ceph prerequisites are one of the following:. Source: about 1 year ago
Storage: Favor any distributed storage you know to start with for Persistent Volumes: Ceph maybe via rook.io, Longhorn if you go rancher etc. Source: over 1 year ago
tracee - Runtime security and forensics using eBPF.
Minio - Minio is an open-source minimal cloud storage server.
CrowdStrike Falcon - Detect, prevent, and respond to attacks with next-generation endpoint protection.
Ceph - Ceph is a distributed object store and file system designed to provide excellent performance...
Check Point Endpoint Security - Check Point Infinity is the first consolidated security across networks, cloud and mobile, providing the highest level of threat prevention against both known and unknown targeted attacks to keep you protected now and in the future.
Openstack Swift - Application and Data, Data Stores, and Cloud Storage