Decentralized Architecture
ROOK operates on a decentralized platform, ensuring that it is not controlled by a single entity, promoting transparency and reducing the risk of censorship.
Increased Security
ROOK's decentralized nature and use of blockchain technology provide a robust security framework that protects against hacks and malicious activities.
Privacy Features
The platform offers enhanced privacy features for users, ensuring that sensitive data and transactions are kept confidential.
Community-Driven Development
ROOK's development is guided by its community, which allows for a more democratic and grass-root approach to feature updates and improvements.
We have collected here some useful links to help you find out if ROOK is good.
Check the traffic stats of ROOK on SimilarWeb. The key metrics to look for are: monthly visits, average visit duration, pages per visit, and traffic by country. Moreoever, check the traffic sources. For example "Direct" traffic is a good sign.
Check the "Domain Rating" of ROOK on Ahrefs. The domain rating is a measure of the strength of a website's backlink profile on a scale from 0 to 100. It shows the strength of ROOK's backlink profile compared to the other websites. In most cases a domain rating of 60+ is considered good and 70+ is considered very good.
Check the "Domain Authority" of ROOK on MOZ. A website's domain authority (DA) is a search engine ranking score that predicts how well a website will rank on search engine result pages (SERPs). It is based on a 100-point logarithmic scale, with higher scores corresponding to a greater likelihood of ranking. This is another useful metric to check if a website is good.
The latest comments about ROOK on Reddit. This can help you find out how popualr the product is and what people think about it.
Copy/paste from a previous thread [0]: Weโve done some fairly extensive testing internally recently and found that Garage is somewhat easier to deploy, but is not as performant at high speeds. IIRC we could push about 5 gigabits of (not small) GET requests out of it, but something blocked it from reaching the 20-25 gigabits (on a 25g NIC) that MinIO could reach (also 50k STAT requests/s) I donโt begrudge it that.... - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
Distributed storage systems enable us to store data that can be made available clusterwide. Excellent! But dynamically apportioning storage across a multi-node cluster is a very complex job. So this is another area where Kubernetes typically outsources the job to plugins (e.g. Cloud providers like Azure or AWS, or systems like Rook or Longhorn). - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
In this blog post, we'll explore how to combine CloudNative-PG (a PostgreSQL operator) and Ceph Rook (a storage orchestrator) to create a PostgreSQL cluster that scales easily, recovers from failures, and ensures data persistenceโ-โall within an Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service EKS cluster. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
My experience is that OpenEBS and Longhorn are cool and new and simplified, but that I would only trust my life to Rook/Ceph. If it's going into production, I'd say look at https://rook.io/ - Ceph can do both block and filesystem volumes. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
I have some experience with Ceph, both for work, and with homelab-y stuff. First, bear in mind that Ceph is a distributed storage system - so the idea is that you will have multiple nodes. For learning, you can definitely virtualise it all on a single box - but you'll have a better time with discrete physical machines. Also, Ceph does prefer physical access to disks (similar to ZFS). And you do need decent... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
Another option is to leverage a Kubernetes-native distributed storage solution such as Rook Ceph as the storage backend for stateful components running on Kubernetes. This has the benefit of simplifying application configuration while addressing business requirements for data backup and recovery such as the ability to take volume snapshots at a regular interval and perform application-level data recovery in case... - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
This is beyond your question but might help someone else: I switch from docker-compose to kubernetes for my home lab a while ago. The storage solution I've settled on is Rook. It was a bit of up-front work learning how to get it up but now that it's done my storage is automatically managed by Ceph. I can swap out drives and Ceph basically takes care of everything itself. Source: about 3 years ago
The stumbling point I am at is I want to use rook.io(Ceph) as my storage solution for the cluster. The Ceph prerequisites are one of the following:. Source: about 3 years ago
Storage: Favor any distributed storage you know to start with for Persistent Volumes: Ceph maybe via rook.io, Longhorn if you go rancher etc. Source: over 3 years ago
Third, it sounds like you're building a cluster. For this you'll either want a central file server. Or better, setup a distributed storage system. For example a Ceph cluster managed by Rook. This way you can fully wipe a single node and the system will be able to recover/replicate thed data. Source: over 3 years ago
If you want build-your-own, give https://rook.io a look. Source: over 3 years ago
I just helped write a quick summary of just why you can trust your persistent workloads to Ceph, managed by Rook and it occurred to me that... I'm probably wrong. Source: almost 4 years ago
Commenting on the distributed storage (cephfs) section.. We use https://rook.io/, which provides an operator to manage the nasty complexities of ceph on Kubernetes. I like it because it means I can manage the cluster lifecycle with a (not-so-simple) YAML, just like everything else :). Source: almost 4 years ago
Do know that ODF has ...substantial... Resource requirements. You may want to consider using the upstream rook.io with ceph and a custom configuration. Source: about 4 years ago
I use rook to orchestrate Ceph, so it takes care of creating the volume for the PVC etc. Unlike the sibling comment, I'm not using VMs so the virtual disk is getting mounted directly into the K8s pods. I like this because then container (in general) is immutable, and just the mutating state is stored in the volume. Source: about 4 years ago
This is my go-to solution every time. Https://rook.io/. Source: over 4 years ago
At my work (Kubernetes Service Provider), we're running Ceph RBD and CephFS with Rook (https://rook.io) for environments which don't provide a CSI driver. However, depending on your requirements and setup, that may be vastly overkill. We did try Longhorn too, but decided on Rook.io since the admin experience is much nicer in our opinion. Source: over 4 years ago
How are you handling storage? I always thought of running this kind of setup along with something like rook.io. Source: over 4 years ago
I "nuke" the additional volumes to not contain any filesystem and then use rook.io to provide the storage for the cluster. Rook deploys ceph inside your cluster and provides the storageclasses to have block devices or even a shared filesystem. Source: over 4 years ago
I always wondered how well rook.io Ceph would perform on 8GB PI 4s and SSD USBs. Unfortunately those are very hard to buy nowadays. Source: over 4 years ago
In Kubernetes, we do storage using distributed systems. For example, Rook can be used to deploy a Ceph cluster. Source: over 4 years ago
Do you know an article comparing ROOK to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
Is ROOK good? This is an informative page that will help you find out. Moreover, you can review and discuss ROOK here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.