Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

ROOK VS tracee

Compare ROOK VS tracee and see what are their differences

ROOK logo ROOK

Object Storage

tracee logo tracee

Runtime security and forensics using eBPF.
  • ROOK Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-08-27
  • tracee Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-22

ROOK videos

The Rook Review

More videos:

  • Review - 2020 Surface 604 Rook Review - $2k

tracee videos

No tracee videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to ROOK and tracee)
Cloud Storage
100 100%
0% 0
Cyber Security
0 0%
100% 100
Cloud Computing
100 100%
0% 0
Monitoring Tools
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using ROOK and tracee. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, ROOK seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 23 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

ROOK mentions (23)

  • Ceph: A Journey to 1 TiB/s
    I have some experience with Ceph, both for work, and with homelab-y stuff. First, bear in mind that Ceph is a distributed storage system - so the idea is that you will have multiple nodes. For learning, you can definitely virtualise it all on a single box - but you'll have a better time with discrete physical machines. Also, Ceph does prefer physical access to disks (similar to ZFS). And you do need decent... - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • Running stateful workloads on Kubernetes with Rook Ceph
    Another option is to leverage a Kubernetes-native distributed storage solution such as Rook Ceph as the storage backend for stateful components running on Kubernetes. This has the benefit of simplifying application configuration while addressing business requirements for data backup and recovery such as the ability to take volume snapshots at a regular interval and perform application-level data recovery in case... - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • People who run Nextcloud in Docker: Where do you store your data/files? In a Docker volume, or on a remote server/NAS?
    This is beyond your question but might help someone else: I switch from docker-compose to kubernetes for my home lab a while ago. The storage solution I've settled on is Rook. It was a bit of up-front work learning how to get it up but now that it's done my storage is automatically managed by Ceph. I can swap out drives and Ceph basically takes care of everything itself. Source: 12 months ago
  • Rook/Ceph with VM nodes on research cluster?
    The stumbling point I am at is I want to use rook.io(Ceph) as my storage solution for the cluster. The Ceph prerequisites are one of the following:. Source: about 1 year ago
  • Running on-premise k8s with a small team: possible or potential nightmare?
    Storage: Favor any distributed storage you know to start with for Persistent Volumes: Ceph maybe via rook.io, Longhorn if you go rancher etc. Source: over 1 year ago
View more

tracee mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of tracee yet. Tracking of tracee recommendations started around Jun 2022.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing ROOK and tracee, you can also consider the following products

Minio - Minio is an open-source minimal cloud storage server.

Sysdig Falco - Runtime Security

Ceph - Ceph is a distributed object store and file system designed to provide excellent performance...

CrowdStrike Falcon - Detect, prevent, and respond to attacks with next-generation endpoint protection.

GlusterFS - GlusterFS is a scale-out network-attached storage file system.

Check Point Endpoint Security - Check Point Infinity is the first consolidated security across networks, cloud and mobile, providing the highest level of threat prevention against both known and unknown targeted attacks to keep you protected now and in the future.