Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Storj.io VS HTTP

Compare Storj.io VS HTTP and see what are their differences

This page does not exist

Storj.io logo Storj.io

Storj DCS is a decentralized, encrypted and fast Amazon S3-compatible object storage.

HTTP logo HTTP

is an application protocol for distributed, collaborative, and hypermedia information systems.
  • Storj.io Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-20

Storj DCS offers a decentralized cloud object storage that delivers:

  • Enterprise SLAs (service level agreements)
  • Encryption by default
  • Edge-based access management for maximum privacy
  • Performance on par or even better than centralized providers
  • A simple onboarding experience with a free tier
  • Easy migration from existing without running additional software or requiring major code changes

Storj DCS is an enterprise-grade Amazon S3-compatible object storage, while leveraging the benefits of decentralization, combined with superior privacy and inherent cross-geography redundancy achieved through encryptions and erasure coding.

Storj DCS is well suited for use cases like backing up large data sets from academic research to autonomous vehicles, point-to-port file transfer for large files, software distribution or media serving. The following video which explains how Storj DCS works, streams directly from the decentralized cloud: How it works - Click here

  • HTTP Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-12-21

Storj.io

Website
storj.io
$ Details
Release Date
2020 March
Startup details
Country
United States
State
Georgia
City
Atlanta
Founder(s)
James Prestwich
Employees
50 - 99

Storj.io videos

Demo - Getting started with Storj

More videos:

  • Demo - Demo - Uploading on object on Storj
  • Review - Review of STORJ.IO distributed cloud storage
  • Review - What is STORJ coin? An Honest & In-Depth Review
  • Review - StorjShare Review 3 month update
  • Demo - Introducing Storj DCS
  • Tutorial - Uploading Your First Object to Storj DCS Using the Object Browser
  • Tutorial - Uploading Objects via GatewayMT

HTTP videos

No HTTP videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Storj.io and HTTP)
Cloud Storage
100 100%
0% 0
Web And Application Servers
Storage
100 100%
0% 0
Web Servers
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Storj.io and HTTP. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Storj.io and HTTP

Storj.io Reviews

Wasabi, Storj, Backblaze et al, are promising 80%+ savings compared to Amazon S3... What's the catch?
There is no data redundancy SLA for Storj DCS. So how do you explain that to your CTO/CIO/VP/SRE? To their credit, Storj DCS has enterprise-grade SLAs for most other aspects of the storage service, and it stands to reason that data redundancy should be pretty good thanks to its sprawling global network. However, for some companies, a data redundancy SLA may be a challenging...
Source: dev.to
Battle of decentralized storages: SiaCoin (SC) vs Storj (STORJ) vs Filecoin (FIL)
Storj is another open-source decentralized cloud storage creating project that looks to offer a decentralized, safe and efficient way of managing your data. The platform is Ethereum-based, meaning that the STORJ token is just one of many ERC-20 standard tokens currently being traded on the crypto markets. The company recently migrated to the Ethereum ERC20 standard as it was...

HTTP Reviews

We have no reviews of HTTP yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Storj.io should be more popular than HTTP. It has been mentiond 41 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Storj.io mentions (41)

View more

HTTP mentions (7)

  • Evolving the Web: Discovering the History of HTTP Versions
    HTTP/1.1 was such a game changer for the Internet that it works so well that even through two revisions, RFC 2616 published in June 1999 and RFC 7230– RFC 7235 published in June 2014, HTTP/1.1 was extremely stable until the release of HTTP/2.0 in 2014 — Nearly 18 years later. Before continuing to the next section about HTTP/2.0, let us revisit what journey HTTP/1.1 has been through. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
  • Poll: Are client web requests sent to upstream servers or downstream servers?
    On the one hand, it just seems natural that "upstream" refers to the inbound request being sent from one system to another. It takes effort (connection pooling, throttling, retries, etc.) to make a request to an (upstream) dependency, just as it takes effort to swim upstream. The response is (usually) easy... Just return it... hence, "downstream". Recall the usual meaning of "upload" and "download". Upstream seems... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
  • How to cache TCP, SSL handshake on ALB?
    To me it sounds like you’ve not solved this as the config you’ve mentioned is about preventing “illegal” (none RFC7230 ) requests, it isn’t really related to the problem you posted. Source: over 2 years ago
  • HTTP Protocol Overview
    The program you are using to send data to the server may or may not automatically determine the right content-type header for your data, and knowing how to set and check headers is an essential skill. To learn more about the HTTP protocol check out the MDN guide or read the official standard, RFC 7230. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
  • Show HN: Micro HTTP server in 22 lines of C
    It's neat, but I don't believe it is a compliant implementation of HTTP/1.1 (or 1.0). For example, it does not handle percent-encoded characters in the request URI.[1][2] [1]: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7230#section-3.1.1 [2]: https://www.w3.org/Protocols/HTTP/1.0/spec.html#Request-URI. - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Storj.io and HTTP, you can also consider the following products

Sia - Sia - Decentralized data storage

mini_httpd - mini_httpd is a small HTTP server for low or medium traffic sites.

Cyberduck - A libre FTP, SFTP, WebDAV, S3, Backblaze B2, Azure & OpenStack Swift browser.

thttpd - thttpd is a simple, small, portable, fast, and secure HTTP server.

Igloo Software - Igloo is a modern intranet, it connects people with the information they need to do their best work.

micro_httpd - micro_httpd is a very small Unix-based HTTP server.