ROOK VS GlusterFS

Compare ROOK VS GlusterFS and see what are their differences

BunnyCDN is a simple and powerful CDN, offering lightning fast performance for a fraction of the cost with free SSL, Brotli, HTTP/2 and 100% Pay As You Go pricing. featured

Contents:

» Base Details
» Videos
» Reviews
» Alternatives

GlusterFS

GlusterFS is a scale-out network-attached storage file system.

Landing page //
2021-08-27

Landing page //
2019-03-10

The Rook Review

GlusterFS videos

+ Add

An Overview of GlusterFS Architecture Part 2 - Non-replicated Cluster

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to ROOK and GlusterFS)

GlusterFS

Cloud Storage

23 23%

Cloud Storage

77% 77

Cloud Computing

24 24%

Cloud Computing

76% 76

Object Storage

46 46%

Object Storage

54% 54

Storage

9 9%

Storage

91% 91

User comments

Share your experience with using ROOK and GlusterFS. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, ROOK seems to be a lot more popular than GlusterFS. While we know about 23 links to ROOK, we've tracked only 2 mentions of GlusterFS. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

ROOK mentions (23)

Ceph: A Journey to 1 TiB/s
I have some experience with Ceph, both for work, and with homelab-y stuff. First, bear in mind that Ceph is a distributed storage system - so the idea is that you will have multiple nodes. For learning, you can definitely virtualise it all on a single box - but you'll have a better time with discrete physical machines. Also, Ceph does prefer physical access to disks (similar to ZFS). And you do need decent... - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
Running stateful workloads on Kubernetes with Rook Ceph
Another option is to leverage a Kubernetes-native distributed storage solution such as Rook Ceph as the storage backend for stateful components running on Kubernetes. This has the benefit of simplifying application configuration while addressing business requirements for data backup and recovery such as the ability to take volume snapshots at a regular interval and perform application-level data recovery in case... - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
People who run Nextcloud in Docker: Where do you store your data/files? In a Docker volume, or on a remote server/NAS?
This is beyond your question but might help someone else: I switch from docker-compose to kubernetes for my home lab a while ago. The storage solution I've settled on is Rook. It was a bit of up-front work learning how to get it up but now that it's done my storage is automatically managed by Ceph. I can swap out drives and Ceph basically takes care of everything itself. Source: 10 months ago
Rook/Ceph with VM nodes on research cluster?
The stumbling point I am at is I want to use rook.io(Ceph) as my storage solution for the cluster. The Ceph prerequisites are one of the following:. Source: 12 months ago
Running on-premise k8s with a small team: possible or potential nightmare?
Storage: Favor any distributed storage you know to start with for Persistent Volumes: Ceph maybe via rook.io, Longhorn if you go rancher etc. Source: over 1 year ago

GlusterFS mentions (2)

[D] What are the compute options you've considered for your projects?
I am a fan of Gearman to schedule and dispatch distributed jobs, Redis as a collaborative blackboard, and GlusterFS to share models across multiple systems and make bulk data available across the entire system (usually referenced in the blackboard as a pathname). Source: 12 months ago
Gluster vs Oracle Gluster
If you're not relying on support, then I would probably standardize on the latest packages available from gluster.org. Source: almost 3 years ago