ROOK VS rkt

Compare ROOK VS rkt and see what are their differences

Bunny.net

BunnyCDN is a simple and powerful CDN, offering lightning fast performance for a fraction of the cost with free SSL, Brotli, HTTP/2 and 100% Pay As You Go pricing. featured

Contents:

» Base Details
» Videos
» Reviews
» Alternatives

rkt

App Container runtime

Landing page //
2021-08-27

Landing page //
2023-05-08

The Rook Review

rkt videos

+ Add

RKT IPO Review | Is Rocket a Buy for 2020? | Matt Mulvihill

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to ROOK and rkt)

rkt

Cloud Computing

37 37%

Cloud Computing

63% 63

Cloud Storage

45 45%

Cloud Storage

55% 55

Object Storage

100 100%

Object Storage

0% 0

Storage

17 17%

Storage

83% 83

User comments

Share your experience with using ROOK and rkt. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare ROOK and rkt

ROOK Reviews

We have no reviews of ROOK yet.
Be the first one to post

In 2018, 12 percent of production containers were rkt (pronounced “Rocket”). Rkt supports two types of images: Docker and appc. A selling point of rkt is its pod-based process that works out of the box with Kubernetes (also referred to as “rktnetes”). In Kubernetes, an rkt container runtime can easily be specified:

Source: containerjournal.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, ROOK seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 23 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

ROOK mentions (23)

Ceph: A Journey to 1 TiB/s
I have some experience with Ceph, both for work, and with homelab-y stuff. First, bear in mind that Ceph is a distributed storage system - so the idea is that you will have multiple nodes. For learning, you can definitely virtualise it all on a single box - but you'll have a better time with discrete physical machines. Also, Ceph does prefer physical access to disks (similar to ZFS). And you do need decent... - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
Running stateful workloads on Kubernetes with Rook Ceph
Another option is to leverage a Kubernetes-native distributed storage solution such as Rook Ceph as the storage backend for stateful components running on Kubernetes. This has the benefit of simplifying application configuration while addressing business requirements for data backup and recovery such as the ability to take volume snapshots at a regular interval and perform application-level data recovery in case... - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
People who run Nextcloud in Docker: Where do you store your data/files? In a Docker volume, or on a remote server/NAS?
This is beyond your question but might help someone else: I switch from docker-compose to kubernetes for my home lab a while ago. The storage solution I've settled on is Rook. It was a bit of up-front work learning how to get it up but now that it's done my storage is automatically managed by Ceph. I can swap out drives and Ceph basically takes care of everything itself. Source: 11 months ago
Rook/Ceph with VM nodes on research cluster?
The stumbling point I am at is I want to use rook.io(Ceph) as my storage solution for the cluster. The Ceph prerequisites are one of the following:. Source: about 1 year ago
Running on-premise k8s with a small team: possible or potential nightmare?
Storage: Favor any distributed storage you know to start with for Persistent Volumes: Ceph maybe via rook.io, Longhorn if you go rancher etc. Source: over 1 year ago