Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Reviewable VS Heroku Button

Compare Reviewable VS Heroku Button and see what are their differences

Reviewable logo Reviewable

GitHub code review platform.

Heroku Button logo Heroku Button

One-click deploy to Heroku from git repos
  • Reviewable Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-01-03
  • Heroku Button Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-15

Reviewable features and specs

  • Detailed Review Process
    Reviewable offers a highly customizable review process that allows teams to define their own criteria for code reviews. This flexibility can enhance the quality of code by ensuring thorough checks and balances.
  • Integration with GitHub
    The platform integrates seamlessly with GitHub, which is beneficial for developers already using GitHub as their primary code repository. This integration enables streamlined workflows without the need to switch between multiple tools.
  • Real-time Collaboration
    Reviewable supports real-time collaboration, allowing team members to see changes and comments as they happen. This feature can enhance communication and the speed of the review process.
  • Advanced Commenting Features
    The tool offers advanced commenting features, such as single-threaded discussions and the ability to mark issues as resolved, which can help keep feedback organized and clear.
  • High Customizability
    Users can tailor the review process with various configurations, such as review state tracking and custom checklists. This customizability allows teams to adapt the tool to their workflow needs.

Possible disadvantages of Reviewable

  • Complex Setup
    The initial setup of Reviewable can be complex and time-consuming, especially for teams not familiar with configuring such tools. This can create a steep learning curve for new users.
  • Cost
    Reviewable is a paid service, and the cost can be a concern for small teams or individual developers, especially when considering other free or cheaper code review options.
  • Limited to GitHub
    As Reviewable is designed specifically for use with GitHub, teams using other version control systems like GitLab or Bitbucket won't be able to integrate the tool into their workflows.
  • Overwhelming Feature Set
    While Reviewable offers numerous features, this extensive set can be overwhelming for new users who may not need all of the functionalities, leading to potential underutilization.
  • User Interface Complexity
    Some users may find the user interface complex, with a high amount of information displayed at once. This can make it difficult to navigate for those who prefer simpler, more straightforward interfaces.

Heroku Button features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    The Heroku Button allows users to deploy applications to Heroku with a single click, simplifying the deployment process and making it accessible even to those with limited technical expertise.
  • Rapid Deployment
    It significantly speeds up the deployment time by automating the setup process, which is beneficial for developers looking to quickly prototype or share applications.
  • Standardization
    Using Heroku Button enforces standardized build configurations through a defined app.json file, ensuring consistency in deployments.
  • GitHub Integration
    Heroku Button can easily integrate with GitHub repositories, allowing seamless deployment of code hosted on GitHub.
  • Simple Configuration
    Through the app.json file, developers can define configuration variables, add-ons, and other settings in a straightforward manner, reducing the complexity of environment setup.

Possible disadvantages of Heroku Button

  • Limited Customization
    The Heroku Button offers limited customization options during deployment, which may not be suitable for more complex applications requiring specific configurations.
  • Dependency on App.json
    Deployment relies heavily on the app.json file. Any mistakes or omissions in this file can lead to deployment failures or misconfigurations.
  • Scalability Constraints
    The button is more suited for small to medium-sized applications; scaling larger applications may require more advanced configuration than what the Heroku Button provides.
  • Potential Over-Simplification
    While simplifying deployments, it may obscure important deployment steps and configurations that developers should handle manually, potentially leading to a lack of understanding of the deployment process.
  • Heroku Platform Dependency
    Using the Heroku Button ties the application to the Heroku platform, which may not be suitable for developers or businesses looking for platform-agnostic deployment solutions.

Reviewable videos

Reviewable -- what is the fastest way to check out your review code?

Heroku Button videos

No Heroku Button videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Reviewable and Heroku Button)
Developer Tools
68 68%
32% 32
Code Collaboration
100 100%
0% 0
Cloud Computing
0 0%
100% 100
Code Review
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Reviewable and Heroku Button. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Reviewable seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 21 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Reviewable mentions (21)

  • A list of SaaS, PaaS and IaaS offerings that have free tiers of interest to devops and infradev
    Reviewable.io — Code review for GitHub repositories, free for public or personal repos. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • The GitHub for Code Review UI Needs Serious Innovation
    Yep, I agree! I work at, and use, Reviewable (https://reviewable.io) and we're the best way to review code on GitHub because we've focused on making the whole process better at every step. We've improved diffing, not only for large files (we support larger files than GitHub does) but also for understanding that diff. Have you ever reviewed a PR twice, but the second time around all your comments are gone and you... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Software Engineering at Google
    Https://reviewable.io is the earliest full-powered Critique alternative for GitHub. It supports some cool things Critique doesn't/didn't, such as reviewing multi-commit branches (also across history-rewriting force-push cleanups), and indicating exactly the nature of your comment (just FYI, or you want this to be changed before you'll give your approval). (I was an intern in the initial making of Critique, and... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
  • Codereview: Should the Go project stop importing GitHub PRs?
    The linux kernel, which is open source and does want contributors, is doing more-or-less just fine with an email-based PR and review flow. If it's an open source project, it should be using an open source review platform that allows improvements and specialization of the code hosting too. Using github, where the review tools are bad and can't be improved by an outsider, is a slap in the face to open source.... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
  • Show HN: Visibly – More Collaborative and Efficient Code Reviews on GitHub
    >See reviewer presence so that you can see if someone is already reviewing and avoid unnecessary pings. >Visibly values privacy and security above all else These two things seem squarely at odds. Personally, I don't want my code review tool announcing to developers when I'm looking at their PR. The fact that it's a Chrome extension would also be a big blocker for me. I run a dev team, and I wouldn't... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
View more

Heroku Button mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Heroku Button yet. Tracking of Heroku Button recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Reviewable and Heroku Button, you can also consider the following products

Trag - AI code reviews. Review your PR in minutes, not days.

Heroku - Agile deployment platform for Ruby, Node.js, Clojure, Java, Python, and Scala. Setup takes only minutes and deploys are instant through git. Leave tedious server maintenance to Heroku and focus on your code.

Atlassian Crucible - Collaborative peer code review tool.

Flynn - Run apps, databases, websites and services at scale.

Review Board - Stress-free code review for teams of all sizes

DigitalOcean Marketplace - Discover and deploy preconfigured one-click applications