Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Review Board VS Heroku Button

Compare Review Board VS Heroku Button and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Review Board logo Review Board

Stress-free code review for teams of all sizes

Heroku Button logo Heroku Button

One-click deploy to Heroku from git repos
  • Review Board Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-21
  • Heroku Button Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-15

Review Board features and specs

  • Open Source
    Review Board is open source, which means it is free to use and can be customized according to your needs. You can modify the source code to adjust its functionality to match your project requirements.
  • Supports Multiple SCMs
    Review Board supports multiple source code management systems such as Git, Subversion, Mercurial, and more, making it versatile for organizations using different systems.
  • Web-based Interface
    It has an intuitive and easy-to-use web-based interface which simplifies the process of managing and reviewing code changes across teams.
  • Integrations
    Offers integration with various tools like Slack, Jenkins, and others, enhancing its functionality and allowing seamless workflow automation.
  • Extensive Documentation
    Comes with extensive documentation and a supportive community that assist users in troubleshooting and effectively utilizing the tool.

Possible disadvantages of Review Board

  • Self-hosting Requirements
    Being self-hosted, it requires server resources and management, which could add overhead for teams lacking dedicated IT support.
  • Setup Complexity
    Initial setup and configuration can be complex and time-consuming, which might be challenging for less technical teams or small organizations.
  • Performance
    Performance can be an issue with large repositories or a substantial number of reviews, which may affect speed and user experience.
  • Limited Mobile Optimization
    The mobile experience is not as optimized, making it difficult for users to review code efficiently on mobile devices.
  • Interface Customization
    While customizable, the user interface might not be as flexible or modern as some proprietary alternatives, potentially impacting user friendliness.

Heroku Button features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    The Heroku Button allows users to deploy applications to Heroku with a single click, simplifying the deployment process and making it accessible even to those with limited technical expertise.
  • Rapid Deployment
    It significantly speeds up the deployment time by automating the setup process, which is beneficial for developers looking to quickly prototype or share applications.
  • Standardization
    Using Heroku Button enforces standardized build configurations through a defined app.json file, ensuring consistency in deployments.
  • GitHub Integration
    Heroku Button can easily integrate with GitHub repositories, allowing seamless deployment of code hosted on GitHub.
  • Simple Configuration
    Through the app.json file, developers can define configuration variables, add-ons, and other settings in a straightforward manner, reducing the complexity of environment setup.

Possible disadvantages of Heroku Button

  • Limited Customization
    The Heroku Button offers limited customization options during deployment, which may not be suitable for more complex applications requiring specific configurations.
  • Dependency on App.json
    Deployment relies heavily on the app.json file. Any mistakes or omissions in this file can lead to deployment failures or misconfigurations.
  • Scalability Constraints
    The button is more suited for small to medium-sized applications; scaling larger applications may require more advanced configuration than what the Heroku Button provides.
  • Potential Over-Simplification
    While simplifying deployments, it may obscure important deployment steps and configurations that developers should handle manually, potentially leading to a lack of understanding of the deployment process.
  • Heroku Platform Dependency
    Using the Heroku Button ties the application to the Heroku platform, which may not be suitable for developers or businesses looking for platform-agnostic deployment solutions.

Review Board videos

Review Board 2.5 is here!

More videos:

  • Review - Material Review Board

Heroku Button videos

No Heroku Button videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Review Board and Heroku Button)
Code Collaboration
100 100%
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Git
100 100%
0% 0
Cloud Computing
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Review Board and Heroku Button. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Review Board and Heroku Button, you can also consider the following products

Phabricator - Phacility - Phabricator

Heroku - Agile deployment platform for Ruby, Node.js, Clojure, Java, Python, and Scala. Setup takes only minutes and deploys are instant through git. Leave tedious server maintenance to Heroku and focus on your code.

GitHub - Originally founded as a project to simplify sharing code, GitHub has grown into an application used by over a million people to store over two million code repositories, making GitHub the largest code host in the world.

Flynn - Run apps, databases, websites and services at scale.

Atlassian Crucible - Collaborative peer code review tool.

DigitalOcean Marketplace - Discover and deploy preconfigured one-click applications