Based on our record, GitHub seems to be a lot more popular than Reviewable. While we know about 2045 links to GitHub, we've tracked only 21 mentions of Reviewable. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Reviewable.io — Code review for GitHub repositories, free for public or personal repos. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
Yep, I agree! I work at, and use, Reviewable (https://reviewable.io) and we're the best way to review code on GitHub because we've focused on making the whole process better at every step. We've improved diffing, not only for large files (we support larger files than GitHub does) but also for understanding that diff. Have you ever reviewed a PR twice, but the second time around all your comments are gone and you... - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
Https://reviewable.io is the earliest full-powered Critique alternative for GitHub. It supports some cool things Critique doesn't/didn't, such as reviewing multi-commit branches (also across history-rewriting force-push cleanups), and indicating exactly the nature of your comment (just FYI, or you want this to be changed before you'll give your approval). (I was an intern in the initial making of Critique, and... - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
The linux kernel, which is open source and does want contributors, is doing more-or-less just fine with an email-based PR and review flow. If it's an open source project, it should be using an open source review platform that allows improvements and specialization of the code hosting too. Using github, where the review tools are bad and can't be improved by an outsider, is a slap in the face to open source.... - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago
>See reviewer presence so that you can see if someone is already reviewing and avoid unnecessary pings. >Visibly values privacy and security above all else These two things seem squarely at odds. Personally, I don't want my code review tool announcing to developers when I'm looking at their PR. The fact that it's a Chrome extension would also be a big blocker for me. I run a dev team, and I wouldn't... - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago
To realize continuous integration in practice, we rely on version control systems(VCS) such as Git, code repositories such as GitHub, and build automation tools such as GitHub Actions. - Source: dev.to / about 2 hours ago
Often, when we set up version control initial files for a project, we tend to log onto the Github website to create our repositories, clone, and push our projects. While this method works, it can be argued that it is not as efficient. We can manage our GitHub repositories, from creating the repo to maintaining the different versions, right from our terminal. In this article, we will go through the process of... - Source: dev.to / 5 days ago
There is no setup, all you need to do is navigate to https://github.com and create an account if not already. - Source: dev.to / 6 days ago
The code for this WebSocket server is available on my GitHub repository: mayank-sahai/socket-js (github.com). - Source: dev.to / 6 days ago
Learn version control and push your projects to Github, an open-source version control software that lets multiple people make separate changes to web pages at the same time. - Source: dev.to / 9 days ago
Gerrit Code Review - OpenSource Git Code Review Tool
GitLab - Create, review and deploy code together with GitLab open source git repo management software | GitLab
Phabricator - Phacility - Phabricator
BitBucket - Bitbucket is a free code hosting site for Mercurial and Git. Manage your development with a hosted wiki, issue tracker and source code.
Review Board - Stress-free code review for teams of all sizes
Visual Studio Code - Build and debug modern web and cloud applications, by Microsoft