Based on our record, GitHub seems to be a lot more popular than Reviewable. While we know about 2268 links to GitHub, we've tracked only 21 mentions of Reviewable. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Reviewable.io — Code review for GitHub repositories, free for public or personal repos. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
Yep, I agree! I work at, and use, Reviewable (https://reviewable.io) and we're the best way to review code on GitHub because we've focused on making the whole process better at every step. We've improved diffing, not only for large files (we support larger files than GitHub does) but also for understanding that diff. Have you ever reviewed a PR twice, but the second time around all your comments are gone and you... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
Https://reviewable.io is the earliest full-powered Critique alternative for GitHub. It supports some cool things Critique doesn't/didn't, such as reviewing multi-commit branches (also across history-rewriting force-push cleanups), and indicating exactly the nature of your comment (just FYI, or you want this to be changed before you'll give your approval). (I was an intern in the initial making of Critique, and... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
The linux kernel, which is open source and does want contributors, is doing more-or-less just fine with an email-based PR and review flow. If it's an open source project, it should be using an open source review platform that allows improvements and specialization of the code hosting too. Using github, where the review tools are bad and can't be improved by an outsider, is a slap in the face to open source.... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
>See reviewer presence so that you can see if someone is already reviewing and avoid unnecessary pings. >Visibly values privacy and security above all else These two things seem squarely at odds. Personally, I don't want my code review tool announcing to developers when I'm looking at their PR. The fact that it's a Chrome extension would also be a big blocker for me. I run a dev team, and I wouldn't... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
If you don’t have one already, go to https://github.com and sign up for a free account. Be sure to use your school-issued email address if you have one—it helps GitHub verify your student status faster. - Source: dev.to / 3 days ago
The most important thing you should do for any MiniScript-related project is to tag it (in the "About" info) with miniscript. This will cause your project to appear under the miniscript topics list: Https://github.com/topics/miniscript. - Source: dev.to / 3 days ago
Go to https://github.com///settings/pages and click the live site to verify it is running. - Source: dev.to / 3 days ago
SSH into the server and clone your repo: Git clone https://github.com//.git Cd Npm install Node app.js # or your startup script Ensure it runs on port 3000. - Source: dev.to / 4 days ago
In open source and innersource projects, like the ones that you find on GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket, the README document is the project's welcome page. It's the first thing people see when they search for a project. README documents describe what the project is, how you use it, and how you can add to it. If you want your project to be successful, your README document must give a good first impression. - Source: dev.to / 5 days ago
Trag - AI code reviews. Review your PR in minutes, not days.
GitLab - Create, review and deploy code together with GitLab open source git repo management software | GitLab
Atlassian Crucible - Collaborative peer code review tool.
BitBucket - Bitbucket is a free code hosting site for Mercurial and Git. Manage your development with a hosted wiki, issue tracker and source code.
Review Board - Stress-free code review for teams of all sizes
VS Code - Build and debug modern web and cloud applications, by Microsoft