
Reviewable
Atlassian Crucible
CodeRabbit
Review Board
Phabricator
Gerrit Code Review
MergeBoard
BitBucket
GitHub
GitLab
BitBucket
VS Code
Git
Treehouse
Pantheon
CodePen
Reviewable
GitHubBased on our record, GitHub seems to be a lot more popular than Reviewable. While we know about 2470 links to GitHub, we've tracked only 21 mentions of Reviewable. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Reviewable.io โ Code review for GitHub repositories, free for public or personal repos. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
Yep, I agree! I work at, and use, Reviewable (https://reviewable.io) and we're the best way to review code on GitHub because we've focused on making the whole process better at every step. We've improved diffing, not only for large files (we support larger files than GitHub does) but also for understanding that diff. Have you ever reviewed a PR twice, but the second time around all your comments are gone and you... - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago
Https://reviewable.io is the earliest full-powered Critique alternative for GitHub. It supports some cool things Critique doesn't/didn't, such as reviewing multi-commit branches (also across history-rewriting force-push cleanups), and indicating exactly the nature of your comment (just FYI, or you want this to be changed before you'll give your approval). (I was an intern in the initial making of Critique, and... - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago
The linux kernel, which is open source and does want contributors, is doing more-or-less just fine with an email-based PR and review flow. If it's an open source project, it should be using an open source review platform that allows improvements and specialization of the code hosting too. Using github, where the review tools are bad and can't be improved by an outsider, is a slap in the face to open source.... - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
>See reviewer presence so that you can see if someone is already reviewing and avoid unnecessary pings. >Visibly values privacy and security above all else These two things seem squarely at odds. Personally, I don't want my code review tool announcing to developers when I'm looking at their PR. The fact that it's a Chrome extension would also be a big blocker for me. I run a dev team, and I wouldn't... - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
This is why eval and observability ship as a unit, not as separate purchases. agent-eval scores and gates the output โ the tiers above, drift, hallucination. AgentLens captures the trace of how the agent got there: every model step and tool call, the resolved inputs, the raw outputs, the trajectory. Two things fall out of that:. - Source: dev.to / about 11 hours ago
The real fragility is in trying to constrain arguments. The docs are explicit that a pattern like Bash(curl http://github.com/ *) fails to do what it looks like it does. It won't match curl -X GET http://github.com/... (option before the URL), curl https://github.com/... (different protocol), curl -L http://bit.ly/xyz (redirects to GitHub), URL=http://github.com && curl $URL (variable), or curl http://github.com... - Source: dev.to / 2 days ago
Fallback chains โ og:title โ twitter:title โ- SSRF protection โ if you fetch user-supplied URLs, you MUST block
localhost, RFC-1918 ranges, and internal hostnames, or your preview endpoint is a proxy into your own infrastructure- Caching โ you do not want to re-fetch a URL on every render
- Rate limiting โ a public...
- Source: dev.to / 4 days ago
$ git pull Remote: Repository not found. Fatal: repository 'https://github.com//.git/' not found. - Source: dev.to / 5 days ago
// ==UserScript== // @name GitHub -> Obsidian Task // @namespace obsidian // @version 1.0 // @match https://github.com/*/*/issues/* // @match https://github.com/*/*/pull/* // @grant GM_setClipboard // ==/UserScript== (function () { 'use strict'; function getTitle() { return document.querySelector("bdi")?.textContent.trim(); } function copyTask() { ... - Source: dev.to / 8 days ago
Atlassian Crucible - Collaborative peer code review tool.
GitLab - Create, review and deploy code together with GitLab open source git repo management software | GitLab
CodeRabbit - Unleash AI on Your Code Reviews with CodeRabbit
BitBucket - Bitbucket is a free code hosting site for Mercurial and Git. Manage your development with a hosted wiki, issue tracker and source code.
Review Board - Stress-free code review for teams of all sizes
VS Code - Build and debug modern web and cloud applications, by Microsoft