Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

qutebrowser VS Ruby on Rails

Compare qutebrowser VS Ruby on Rails and see what are their differences

ASocks
Clear, Fast & Unlimited. Residential & Mobile Proxies For Best Price. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

qutebrowser logo qutebrowser

An actively developped, keyboard-focused browser with a minimal GUI, inspired by other...

Ruby on Rails logo Ruby on Rails

Ruby on Rails is an open source full-stack web application framework for the Ruby programming...
  • qutebrowser Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-19
  • Ruby on Rails Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-23

We recommend LibHunt Ruby for discovery and comparisons of trending Ruby projects. Also, to find more open-source ruby alternatives, you can check out libhunt.com/r/rails

qutebrowser features and specs

  • Minimalistic Interface
    Qutebrowser boasts a clean, distraction-free interface that maximizes screen real estate and efficiency.
  • Keyboard-centric Navigation
    Designed for keyboard power users, it offers numerous keyboard shortcuts for navigation, providing a rapid and efficient browsing experience.
  • Open Source
    As an open-source project, it allows users to inspect, modify, and contribute to the code, ensuring transparency and user trust.
  • Customizability
    Users can tailor their browsing experience with extensive configuration options, scripts, and commands to fit their specific needs.
  • Lightweight
    With a focus on minimalism, qutebrowser consumes fewer resources compared to more mainstream browsers, ideal for older hardware.
  • Privacy-focused
    Qutebrowser doesn’t include tracking features, prioritizing user privacy and offering easy integration with privacy-enhancing extensions.

Possible disadvantages of qutebrowser

  • Steep Learning Curve
    The reliance on keyboard shortcuts and the lack of a traditional GUI may be daunting for new users accustomed to more conventional web browsers.
  • Limited Extension Support
    Although it supports some userscripts and a few extensions, it lacks the extensive library of extensions available for browsers like Firefox or Chrome.
  • Initial Setup Complexity
    Setting up and customizing the browser to one’s liking can be time-consuming and requires a fair amount of technical knowledge.
  • Compatibility Issues
    Some websites or web apps might not function correctly due to lesser compatibility compared to mainstream browsers.
  • Small User Base
    The niche audience means less community support, fewer tutorials, and a smaller pool of user-generated content compared to more popular browsers.
  • Frequent Manual Updates
    Users might need to manually update the browser and its configurations more frequently, which can be inconvenient.

Ruby on Rails features and specs

  • Rapid Development
    Ruby on Rails uses conventions over configurations which allows developers to build applications quickly. It comes with a wealth of built-in tools and libraries that streamline the development process.
  • Community Support
    Rails has a vibrant and active community. This means a lot of third-party libraries (gems) are available, and you can easily find help and resources.
  • Convention over Configuration
    Rails emphasizes convention over configuration, which reduces the number of decisions developers need to make. This can increase productivity and consistency across projects.
  • Built-in Testing
    Rails comes with a strong built-in testing framework, making it easier to test your application and ensure that it works as expected.
  • Scalability Options
    Although it has a reputation for not being the most scalable framework, Rails can be made scalable with good architecture and the right tools.
  • RESTful Design
    Rails promotes RESTful application design, which means that it aligns well with best practices in web development and makes it easier to build APIs.

Possible disadvantages of Ruby on Rails

  • Performance
    Ruby on Rails can be slower than some other frameworks, particularly for applications that require a lot of computation or have high traffic.
  • Learning Curve
    While Rails makes many things easier with its conventions, this can create a steep learning curve for newcomers who need to understand the 'Rails way' of doing things.
  • Scalability Concerns
    Due to its monolithic nature, scaling Rails can be challenging, requiring significant architectural changes and optimizations.
  • Lesser Flexibility
    The conventions that make Rails easy to use can also be limiting. When you need to do something outside the typical Rails flow, it may be harder to implement.
  • Runtime Speed
    Ruby, the language that Rails is built on, is generally slower in terms of execution speed compared to other languages like Java or C++.
  • Memory Consumption
    Rails applications can consume a lot of memory, which can be a concern for large-scale applications or those with limited resources.

qutebrowser videos

+ Add

Bye-bye, Qutebrowser...

More videos:

  • Review - Getting Started With Qutebrowser
  • Review - qutebrowser - All the Cool Kids should try it!

Ruby on Rails videos

+ Add

Ruby On Rails Biggest Waste Of Time In 2020 | Ruby on Rails Dead

More videos:

  • Tutorial - Ruby on Rails Tutorial | Build a Book Review App - Part 1

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to qutebrowser and Ruby on Rails)

qutebrowser

Ruby on Rails

Web Browsers
100 100%
Web Browsers
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
Developer Tools
100% 100
Web Development Tools
100 100%
Web Development Tools
0% 0
Web Frameworks
0 0%
Web Frameworks
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using qutebrowser and Ruby on Rails. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare qutebrowser and Ruby on Rails

qutebrowser Reviews

We have no reviews of qutebrowser yet.
Be the first one to post

Ruby on Rails Reviews

  1. Stan
    · Founder at SaaSHub ·
    The most productive web framework

    Yes, there are other more trending frameworks; however, nothing reaches the productivity of Rails. It's simply unbeatable if you have a small team.

    For example both SaaSHub and LibHunt were built on Rails.

    🏁 Competitors: Django, Laravel
Top 9 best Frameworks for web development
The best frameworks for web development include React, Angular, Vue.js, Django, Spring, Laravel, Ruby on Rails, Flask and Express.js. Each of these frameworks has its own advantages and distinctive features, so it is important to choose the framework that best suits the needs of your project.
Source: www.kiwop.com
Top 5 Laravel Alternatives
In terms of documentation, guidelines, and libraries, Ruby on Rails is the superior framework for smaller applications. Since it entered the online scene before Laravel, its community is larger and more well-liked among programmers. When compared to other Laravel alternatives, Ruby’s code is much simpler to understand and write.
Source: www.etatvasoft.com
Top 10 Phoenix Framework Alternatives
While modern frameworks try to minimize the tradeoffs to a limited extent, none of them has come closer to the implementation of the Phoenix Framework, which offers Ruby on Rails levels of productivity while being one of the fastest frameworks available in the market.
Source: blog.back4app.com
10 Ruby on Rails Alternatives For Web Development in 2022
Once a prolific web development technology, in 2021, both Ruby and Ruby on Rails are considered dying technologies. The data speaks for itself. In October 2021, Ruby lost 3 ranks in the Tiobe Index compared to October 2020 and became the 16th most searched programming language. The same decline in Ruby on Rails popularity is demonstrated by Google Trends. The language...
Source: www.ideamotive.co
Get Over Ruby on Rails — 3 Alternative Web Frameworks Worth Checking Out
Disclaimer: I started working on this article before the big controversy about Basecamp happened. I don’t want to make any point about this in the article. Regardless of what DHH and others are saying on different topics, Ruby on Rails is still a great piece of software and will continue to be. But there are some great alternatives as well that I would like to highlight.
Source: betterprogramming.pub

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Ruby on Rails should be more popular than qutebrowser. It has been mentiond 142 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

qutebrowser mentions (48)

View more

Ruby on Rails mentions (142)

  • Unlocking Opportunities: How to Thrive as a Ruby Engineer in Today's Tech Landscape
    Ruby on Rails open source projects. Contribute and learn at the same time. - Source: dev.to / 16 days ago
  • Open Source: A Goldmine for Indie Hackers
    Speed of Development: Frameworks such as Django or Rails accelerate the development process. - Source: dev.to / 17 days ago
  • Indie Hacking with Open Source Tools: Innovating on a Budget
    This ecosystem is fueled by repositories hosting powerful languages, functions, and versatile tools—from backend frameworks like Django and Ruby on Rails to containerization with Docker and distributed version control via Git. Moreover, indie hackers can also utilize open source design tools (e.g. GIMP, Inkscape) and analytics platforms such as Matomo. - Source: dev.to / 19 days ago
  • Charybdis ORM: Building High-Performance Distributed Rust Backends with ScyllaDB
    Ruby on Rails (RoR) is one of the most renowned web frameworks. When combined with SQL databases, RoR transforms into a powerhouse for developing back-end (or even full-stack) applications. It resolves numerous issues out of the box, sometimes without developers even realizing it. For example, with the right callbacks, complex business logic for a single API action is automatically wrapped within a transaction,... - Source: dev.to / 29 days ago
  • Ask HN: What's the ideal stack for a solo dev in 2025
    As it's just you I'd stick with Ruby on Rails 8[1] as you already know it and I think it could realistically easily achieve what you're proposing. There's lots of libraries to for calling out external AI services. e.g. Something like FastMCP[2] From the sound of it that's all you need. I'd use Hotwire[3] for the frontend and Hotwire Native if you want to rollout an app version quickly. I'd back it with... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing qutebrowser and Ruby on Rails, you can also consider the following products

Pale Moon - Pale Moon is an Open Source, Mozilla-derived web browser available for Microsoft Windows and Linux, focusing on efficiency and ease of use.

Django - The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines

Brave - Fast and secure, ad and tracker blocking browser.

Laravel - A PHP Framework For Web Artisans

Vivaldi - Vivaldi is a free, fast web browser designed for power-users. You decide how you browse. Download Vivaldi's fully customisable browser now and browse your way.

ASP.NET - ASP.NET is a free web framework for building great Web sites and Web applications using HTML, CSS and JavaScript.

Loading...