Based on our record, Webpack seems to be a lot more popular than pkgsrc. While we know about 220 links to Webpack, we've tracked only 8 mentions of pkgsrc. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
It seems according to pkgsrc.org that pkgin might follow the PKG_PATH environment variable. You're supposed to set PKG_PATH="http://cdn.NetBSD.org/pub/pkgsrc/packages/NetBSD/$(uname -p)/$(uname -r|cut -f '1 2' -d.)/All/", and according to uname(1), -p gives the processor architecture and -r gives the operating system [kernel] release. Source: about 1 year ago
It seems like pkgsrc.org hasn’t got the news yet. Source: over 1 year ago
I still have a Slackware install that runs some really old stuff I have. I remember working at AN ISP in the 90s and slack was are secure distro. All the important stuff (authentication, configs, etc.) were stored and served from our 'slack pool'. Funny part is now I do a very basic Slackware install that setup pkgsrc (https://pkgsrc.org) on it so I can really experience the best and worst of times! - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
Today the second article on cross-platform package management has been published. It features a short description of what Pkgsrc and Ravenports are and a longer part on how they compare. The test environment and procedure is covered and of course the results are presented. At the end a conclusion is drawn. Source: over 2 years ago
The second one will contain the results of our two months evaluation of Pkgsrc on multiple platforms and a comparison with Ravenports. Source: over 2 years ago
There are various tools available that manage the size of bundled assets. We are going to use the example of a popular and widely used bundler named Webpack, and practically look at many of the optimization techniques it offers. - Source: dev.to / 2 days ago
In part 3 We jump into the world of bundlers, comparing webpack, esbuild, vite, and parcel 2. This section aims to guide developers through each bundler, focusing on their performance, compatibility, and ease of use. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
Thats all about Webpack Basic, there are lots of feature of webpack, You can check here: https://webpack.js.org/. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
Many web pages use CSS and JavaScript files to handle various features and styles. Each file, however, requires a separate HTTP request, which can slow down page loading. Concatenation comes into play here. It involves combining multiple CSS or JavaScript files into a single file. As a result, pages load faster, reducing the time spent requesting individual files. Gulp, Grunt, and Webpack are some of the tools... - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
Once you build a simple Vite backend integration, try not to complicate Vite's configuration unless you absolutely must. Vite has become one of the most popular bundlers in the frontend space, but it wasn't the first and it certainly won't be the last. In my 7 years of building for the web, I've used Grunt, Gulp, Webpack, esbuild, and Parcel. Snowpack and Rome came-and-went before I ever had a chance to try them.... - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
Conda - Binary package manager with support for environments.
npm - npm is a package manager for Node.
Homebrew - The missing package manager for macOS
rollup.js - Rollup is a module bundler for JavaScript which compiles small pieces of code into a larger piece such as application.
MacPorts - The MacPorts Project is an open-source community initiative to design an easy-to-use system for compiling, installing, and upgrading either command-line, X11 or Aqua based open-source software on the Mac OS X operating system.
Parcel - Blazing fast, zero configuration web application bundler