Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

MediaWiki VS Logseq

Compare MediaWiki VS Logseq and see what are their differences

BoldDesk
Premium Customer Service Software to manage your customer support. Manage support email, publish self-help articles, and automate repetitive tasks. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

MediaWiki logo MediaWiki

MediaWiki is a free software wiki package written in PHP, originally for use on Wikipedia.

Logseq logo Logseq

Logseq is a local-first, non-linear, outliner notebook for organizing and sharing your personal knowledge base.
  • MediaWiki Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-23
  • Logseq Landing page
    Landing page //
    2024-10-15

MediaWiki features and specs

  • Open Source
    MediaWiki is free and open-source software, allowing users to modify the source code to fit their specific needs without incurring licensing fees.
  • Scalable
    MediaWiki is designed to handle large-scale projects, making it suitable for enterprise-level documentation as well as large communal knowledge bases like Wikipedia.
  • Version Control
    Each edit in MediaWiki is stored, allowing users to track changes, revert to previous versions, and see the edit history, which is crucial for collaborative environments.
  • Extensive Documentation
    MediaWiki comes with comprehensive documentation, making it easier for developers and users to get started and troubleshoot any issues that arise.
  • Multilingual Support
    MediaWiki supports multiple languages, enabling the creation of content in various languages, useful for global organizations.
  • Extensible
    MediaWiki is highly extensible via plugins and extensions, allowing users to add functionalities tailored to their specific needs.

Possible disadvantages of MediaWiki

  • Complex Setup
    Setting up and configuring MediaWiki can be complex and time-consuming, potentially requiring technical expertise.
  • Maintenance
    MediaWiki requires regular maintenance, including updates, backups, and performance tuning, which can be resource-intensive.
  • Learning Curve
    For users not familiar with wikis or MediaWiki syntax, the learning curve can be steep, requiring training or time to become proficient.
  • Performance
    MediaWiki can become resource-intensive as the database grows, potentially requiring robust server resources to maintain performance.
  • Limited Features Out-of-the-Box
    While highly extensible, the core installation of MediaWiki has limited features, requiring additional plugins to add necessary functionalities.
  • Security Vulnerabilities
    As with any widely-used software, MediaWiki may be targeted for security vulnerabilities, necessitating regular updates and security patches.

Logseq features and specs

  • Bidirectional Linking
    Logseq allows users to easily create bidirectional links between notes, enhancing organization and navigation through related information.
  • Graph View
    The graph view provides a visual representation of how notes are interconnected, helping users see the bigger picture of their knowledge network.
  • Markdown Support
    Logseq supports Markdown, making it easy to format notes and write in a widely-used plain text format.
  • Local Storage
    Notes are stored locally, giving users full control over their data and enhancing privacy and security.
  • Customizable Workflows
    Users can customize their workflows with plugins and templates to suit their specific needs and preferences.
  • Open Source
    Being an open-source project, Logseq invites community contributions and ensures more transparency in development and issue resolution.
  • Task Management
    Logseq integrates task management features, such as to-do lists and scheduling, directly within notes, improving productivity.

Possible disadvantages of Logseq

  • Learning Curve
    New users may find Logseq's extensive features and unique workflow approach challenging to learn without dedicated time and effort.
  • Sync Complexity
    While storing notes locally is a pro for privacy, it requires additional tools or manual methods to sync notes across multiple devices.
  • Mobile App Limitations
    The mobile version of Logseq is still in development, meaning it may lack some features and fluidity found in the desktop version.
  • Resource Intensive
    Logseq can consume considerable system resources, particularly when dealing with large datasets or extensive use of graph view.
  • Community Dependency
    As an open-source project, certain features may rely on community contributions, which could lead to inconsistent updates or support.
  • Customization Complexity
    While high customization is a benefit, it can become overwhelming and complex to manage for users who prefer a more straightforward tool.

Analysis of MediaWiki

Overall verdict

  • MediaWiki is a highly effective platform for creating and managing collaborative and information-centric websites. Its stability, scalability, and active community support make it a solid choice for individuals and organizations seeking a comprehensive wiki solution.

Why this product is good

  • MediaWiki is a robust, open-source wiki platform originally developed for Wikipedia. Its extensibility and large collection of modules allow users to customize and expand their wikis according to specific needs. The wide community and comprehensive documentation make it approachable for developers and administrators seeking a reliable content management system. Furthermore, MediaWiki’s strong version control and permission system are advantageous for collaborative environments, ensuring that information is managed efficiently and securely.

Recommended for

  • Organizations needing robust documentation platforms
  • Communities aiming to develop collaborative knowledge bases
  • Developers seeking a highly customizable and extensible CMS
  • Educational institutions requiring structured content management

Analysis of Logseq

Overall verdict

  • Yes, Logseq is generally considered a good tool, particularly for individuals seeking a robust, free-form method of organizing notes and knowledge that goes beyond traditional hierarchical models.

Why this product is good

  • Logseq is a versatile tool for managing notes and knowledge using a graph-based interface similar to networked thought processing. It offers features like linked references, back-linking, and support for Markdown and org-mode, making it a valuable tool for those who value interconnected note-taking. Its open-source nature ensures constant community-driven improvements and transparency, encouraging a strong user community.

Recommended for

  • Students and researchers who manage a large volume of interconnected notes.
  • Professionals who require a flexible and dynamic knowledge management system.
  • Writers and content creators looking for a tool to visualize ideas and concepts.
  • Tech enthusiasts and developers who appreciate open-source software.

MediaWiki videos

+ Add

Using A Self Hosted MediaWiki As A Private Documentation Server with Visual Editor

More videos:

  • Review - MediaWiki vs. Confluence

Logseq videos

+ Add

Logseq - A Roam Research Alternative for Notes / PKM / To Do / Journal

More videos:

  • Review - How I use Logseq Daily - A Roam Research Alternative for Notes / PKM / To Do / Journal
  • Review - Logseq Update Video - A Roam Research Alternative for Notes / PKM / To Do / Journal

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to MediaWiki and Logseq)

MediaWiki

Logseq

WiKis
100 100%
WiKis
0% 0
Note Taking
13 13%
Note Taking
87% 87
Knowledge Management
0 0%
Knowledge Management
100% 100
Knowledge Base
28 28%
Knowledge Base
72% 72

User comments

Share your experience with using MediaWiki and Logseq. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare MediaWiki and Logseq

MediaWiki Reviews

Top 12 Self-hosted Wiki Engines for 2024: A Comprehensive Guide
Released in 2002, MediaWiki replaced the initial UseModWiki software used by Wikipedia. It evolved with Wikipedia's growth, introducing features like namespaces, watchlists, and user talk pages. It's been adopted by many organizations for their wikis due to its robust and scalable nature.
Source: medevel.com
The 10 Best Self-hosted Wiki Software for Linux System
MediaWiki is an outstanding self-hosted Wiki software for editing rich multimedia and developing collaborative projects. It is based on the Open Source Technology Project (OST), which allows the distribution of software modules. The main difference between MediaWiki and other wiki software is that MediaWiki uses a lightweight wiki markup, which is easier to learn in the...
Source: www.ubuntupit.com
Best 11 Open-source Free Wiki Engines for teams and enterprise in 2022
MediaWiki is an open-source Wiki engine that runs Wikipedia. It is the oldest system in the list and some may consider it the king of Wiki engines. It supports almost all available languages as it is easy to install and use.
Source: medevel.com
The Best 20 Wiki Software For Your Business& Internal Knowledge for 2022
MediaWiki is a free wiki software that runs platforms like Wikipedia and Wiktionary. It helps in collecting and managing knowledge and making it available to your target audience. Customizable and reliable, this wiki tool requires server maintenance and installation. The best part about MediaWiki is that it provides translation services that help you localize the wiki in...
Source: www.proprofskb.com
17 open source wiki engine/software
MediaWiki is a free and open source server based wiki engine written in PHP developed by Wikipedia. MediaWiki is an extremely powerful, scalable software and a feature-rich wiki implementation, that uses PHP to process and display data stored in its MySQL database. Pages use MediaWiki’s wiki-text format, so that users without knowledge of XHTML or CSS can edit pages easily...
Source: gadgetxplore.com

Logseq Reviews

The 5 Best Open Source Miro Alternatives in 2024
Logseq is a powerful and advanced tool for thought that has been gaining attention among note-taking enthusiasts and productivity seekers. In this article, we will provide an overview of Logseq, explore what users can do with the tool, and highlight its strengths and weaknesses compared to Miro, another popular tool in the note-taking and organization space.
Source: affine.pro
Supercharge Your Productivity: Three Recommended Tools for Thought
Outliners (think Workflowy, Roam, Logseq) rely on blocks and indentation for primary connections, and references to other blocks or pages for richer links. They’re optimized for capturing quick thinking.
Source: medium.com
Logseq vs Roam Research vs Obsidian: which one should you choose?
Refined user interface: Logseq offers a refined user interface that is easy to understand and pleasing to the eyes. On the other hand, Obsidian looks like a jumble of various UI elements which are hard to figure out and look daunting. Logseq wins this round for me, hands down. – The only reason to choose Obsidian’s user interface over Logseq’s is that the former is far more...
Source: medium.com
Best 5 Obsidian Alternatives
Logseq is an open-source outliner application that makes it easy to write, organize and share your thoughts and to-do lists thanks to the ability to create and edit plain-text Markdown and Org-mode files. This means that your data is locally stored and yours forever and that it can be edited with any tools supporting those formats.
Source: www.keepproductive.com
Obsidian vs. Roam vs. LogSeq: Which PKM App is Right For You?
While LogSeq and Roam function very similarly, LogSeq isn’t quite as refined. There’s a lot of thought that went into Roam’s simple interface, and while we appreciate that LogSeq is trying to push things forward in specific areas (like the addition of a Journals page), it doesn’t feel quite as smooth.
Source: thesweetsetup.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Logseq seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 291 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

MediaWiki mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of MediaWiki yet. Tracking of MediaWiki recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Logseq mentions (291)

  • Ditching Obsidian and building my own
    I don't understand the negative concerns mentioned by the author. It's quite easy to sync notes to your mobile device using a free method, or using a cloud service you might already be paying for [4]. The great thing about Obsidian is that the notes itself are just markdown files, so you can use them in any other program. This protects you as a user in case Obsidian enters a enshittification phase. A good... - Source: Hacker News / 10 days ago
  • Why I switched from obsidian: A real developer’s story and what I’m using now
    Logseq Official Website A strong alternative if you love graph-based thinking. - Source: dev.to / 27 days ago
  • Notetime: Minimalistic notes where everything is timestamped
    This idea feels a little like bullet journaling or logseq [0] to me. For what it's worth, I do this in Obsidian and clean-up my thoughts on a regular basis. It hits the right balance of minimalism and usefulness for me. 0: https://logseq.com/. - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago
  • Dear (Rust) Devs: Article Request
    You want to build custom tooling or workflows in Logseq but you don't know Clojure (or Datalog, whatever that is). - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • How to Apply Zettelkasten with Obsidian
    I previously discussed how to apply this method using Logseq, another popular tool that has strong support for journaling. This time, we'll explore how to apply the same principles to Obsidian, another very popular note-taking app. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing MediaWiki and Logseq, you can also consider the following products

DokuWiki - DokuWiki is a simple to use and highly versatile Open Source wiki software that doesn't require a database.

Obsidian.md - A second brain, for you, forever. Obsidian is a powerful knowledge base that works on top of a local folder of plain text Markdown files.

TiddlyWiki - a non-linear personal web notebook

Notion - All-in-one workspace. One tool for your whole team. Write, plan, and get organized.

Wiki.js - An open source, modern and powerful wiki app built on Node.js, Git, and Markdown.

Joplin - Joplin is a free, open source note taking and to-do application, which can handle a large number of notes organised into notebooks. The notes are searchable, tagged and modified either from the applications directly or from your own text editor.

Loading...