Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Material Design for Bootstrap VS Apache CXF

Compare Material Design for Bootstrap VS Apache CXF and see what are their differences

Material Design for Bootstrap logo Material Design for Bootstrap

Material Design for Bootstrap is a Bootstrap compatible theme for use in Bootstrap based application.

Apache CXF logo Apache CXF

Apache CXF, Services Framework - Index
  • Material Design for Bootstrap Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-25
  • Apache CXF Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-12-29

Material Design for Bootstrap features and specs

  • Aesthetic Appeal
    Material Design for Bootstrap provides a modern and visually appealing look by integrating Google's Material Design philosophy with Bootstrap components, which can enhance the user experience and make applications more attractive.
  • Familiarity
    Developers familiar with Bootstrap will find it easy to adopt Material Design for Bootstrap due to its inherent Bootstrap architecture, easing the learning curve while adding Material Design elements.
  • Responsive Design
    Material Design for Bootstrap maintains Bootstrap's robust responsive grid system, enabling designers to create mobile-friendly and adaptable web pages with Material Design aesthetics.
  • Comprehensive Documentation
    The framework offers extensive documentation, examples, and community support, which simplifies the development process and allows for easier troubleshooting and customization.
  • Customization
    It allows for significant customization where developers can override component styles, mix colors, and use variables to align with brand requirements while maintaining Material Design standards.

Possible disadvantages of Material Design for Bootstrap

  • Performance Overhead
    Integrating Material Design with Bootstrap can lead to additional CSS and JavaScript overhead, potentially impacting the performance of the website if not optimized.
  • Complexity
    Combining two design systems can introduce complexity, as developers may need to navigate through both Material Design principles and Bootstrap's framework, which could increase development time.
  • Inconsistencies
    There might be inconsistencies or conflicts between Material Design components and Bootstrap components, particularly when attempting customizations or using third-party plugins not designed for Material Design.
  • Dependency on Bootstrap
    For projects that do not require all the functionalities of Bootstrap, using Material Design for Bootstrap might introduce unnecessary dependencies, resulting in a heavier and bloated front-end.
  • Limited Advanced Components
    While it covers most basic components, developers looking for advanced and highly specialized elements may find Material Design for Bootstrap lacking compared to more dedicated Material Design libraries.

Apache CXF features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Material Design for Bootstrap videos

VueBootstrap vs Material Design For Bootstrap (WHICH ONE SHOULD I CHOOSE?)

More videos:

  • Review - Material Design for Bootstrap PRO - 5 min Quick Start

Apache CXF videos

15-Generating Code - SOAP WSDL to Java using Apache CXF Plugin | Maven for Beginners | Code Journal

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Material Design for Bootstrap and Apache CXF)
Developer Tools
64 64%
36% 36
Web Frameworks
63 63%
37% 37
Ruby Web Framework
57 57%
43% 43
Design Tools
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Material Design for Bootstrap and Apache CXF. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Apache CXF seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Material Design for Bootstrap mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Material Design for Bootstrap yet. Tracking of Material Design for Bootstrap recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Apache CXF mentions (2)

  • It's 2023. Your API should have a schema
    SOAP died because it is awful. There are plenty of java libraries that can generate java code from a WSDL. Apache CXF seem to be the fairly standard library people use. (https://cxf.apache.org). Source: almost 2 years ago
  • What’s Coming in Jakarta REST 3.1?
    A few years back, Adam Bien wrote an excellent blog post on how to configure JSON-B in a Jakarta REST application. The only trouble is that at that time, the approach only worked with Eclipse Jersey. Since then other implementations (including Open Liberty via Apache CXF) also enabled this functionality, but it will become a standard in 3.1, enabling more portable usage of JSON-B configuration. - Source: dev.to / almost 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Material Design for Bootstrap and Apache CXF, you can also consider the following products

ASP.NET - ASP.NET is a free web framework for building great Web sites and Web applications using HTML, CSS and JavaScript.

Ruby on Rails - Ruby on Rails is an open source full-stack web application framework for the Ruby programming...

jQuery UI - Curated set of user interface interactions, effects, widgets, and themes built on top of the jQuery JavaScript Library

Font Awesome - Font Awesome makes it easy to add vector icons and social logos to your website. And version 5 is redesigned and built from the ground up!

DataTables - DataTables is a plug-in for the jQuery Javascript library.

PhotoSwipe - JavaScript gallery, no dependencies.