Jsonnet VS Docker Swarm

Compare Jsonnet VS Docker Swarm and see what are their differences

IsDown.app

Monitor all your cloud services with our status page aggregator. IT teams choose IsDown to monitor all their vendors and get alerts whenever an outage occurs. Integration with Datadog, PagerDuty, Slack, Microsoft Teams, and a lot more. featured

Contents:

» Base Details
» Videos
» Reviews
» Alternatives

Jsonnet

A powerful DSL for elegant description of JSON data.

Docker Swarm

Native clustering for Docker. Turn a pool of Docker hosts into a single, virtual host.

Landing page //
2023-05-26

Landing page //
2022-11-01

Jsonnet

Website: jsonnet.org
$ Details

Edit details

Docker Swarm

Website: github.com
$ Details: -

Edit details

Jsonnet features and specs

Configurability
Jsonnet allows you to write configurations as code, enabling dynamic configuration generation and making it easier to manage complex configurations.
Extensibility
Jsonnet supports functions and imports, enabling code reuse and modular configuration design across different files and projects.
JSON Compatibility
Since Jsonnet is a JSON extension, it is fully compatible with JSON, meaning any valid JSON file is also valid in Jsonnet.
Reduce Repetition
Jsonnet reduces redundancy through capabilities like variables and functions, helping to avoid repetitive configurations and boilerplate.
Final Manifest
Jsonnet outputs a final manifest in JSON, providing a clean and widely-accepted data format that can be used directly by applications.

Possible disadvantages of Jsonnet

Learning Curve
Jsonnet introduces new syntax and concepts (such as mixins and imports) that may require time to learn and adapt to, especially for developers familiar with plain JSON.
Tooling Support
While gaining traction, Jsonnet still has limited tooling and IDE support compared to more established configuration languages or file formats.
Complexity in Parsing
As a more expressive configuration language, Jsonnet may introduce complexity in parsing and understanding configuration files compared to using straightforward JSON.
Overhead
The additional features and functionalities of Jsonnet can introduce computational overhead, potentially making it slower than using simple JSON for very massive configurations.

Docker Swarm features and specs

Simplicity
Docker Swarm is easy to set up and use, especially for those already familiar with Docker. It integrates seamlessly into the Docker ecosystem, providing a straightforward solution for container orchestration without the need for additional tools.
Native Docker Integration
Swarm is built into Docker, meaning that Docker users do not need to install or configure another orchestration tool. This provides a consistent experience from development to production.
Declarative Service Model
Swarm allows users to define the desired state of their services, and the system works to maintain that state. This includes scaling services up or down, and handling load balancing.
Easy Scaling
Docker Swarm makes it easy to scale applications horizontally by simply changing the number of replicas of a service. The platform manages the distribution of these replicas across the available nodes.
Built-in Load Balancing
Swarm includes built-in load balancing, distributing incoming client requests to running containers based on task states and node availability.

Possible disadvantages of Docker Swarm

Limited Ecosystem
Compared to Kubernetes, Docker Swarm has a more limited ecosystem of plugins, extensions, and third-party integrations. This can make it less flexible for complex or custom setups.
Less Feature-Rich
Although sufficient for many use cases, Swarm lacks some advanced features that other orchestrators like Kubernetes offer, such as custom scheduling policies, complex networking configurations, and a broader range of storage options.
Community and Support
The Docker Swarm community is smaller and less active compared to Kubernetes. This affects the available support, community-contributed tools, and overall development pace.
Scaling Limits
While Docker Swarm can handle small to medium-sized clusters efficiently, it may not perform as well as Kubernetes in very large-scale deployments, particularly in terms of resource management and fault tolerance.
Future Uncertainty
With Docker's increasing focus on Kubernetes, the long-term future of Docker Swarm is uncertain. This raises concerns about investing in a technology that might not be as actively developed or supported in the future.

Analysis of Docker Swarm

Overall verdict

Docker Swarm is a good choice for small to medium-sized deployments where ease of setup and tight integration with Docker are priorities. However, for larger, more complex environments or when advanced features like custom scheduling and multi-cloud support are necessary, other orchestration tools like Kubernetes might be more appropriate.

Why this product is good

Docker Swarm is considered good for users who need a simple, integrated tool for managing containers across a cluster of hosts. Its main strengths include seamless integration with Docker, easy setup, and support for multi-host networking and scaling of services. Swarm is a part of Docker, and therefore it benefits from Docker's comprehensive ecosystem, tooling, and documentation. It is particularly suitable for scenarios where a lightweight and straightforward orchestration solution is desired.

Recommended for

Developers who are already familiar with Docker and want minimal learning curve for orchestration.
Small to medium-sized teams looking for easy-to-use, efficient management of containerized applications.
Environments where tight integration with Docker CLI and ecosystem is preferred over advanced orchestration capabilities.

Jsonnet videos

+ Add

Jsonnet

Docker Swarm videos

+ Add

Kubernetes vs Docker Swarm | Container Orchestration War | Kubernetes Training | Edureka

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Jsonnet and Docker Swarm)

Jsonnet

Docker Swarm

Configuration Management

100 100%

Configuration Management

0% 0

Developer Tools

23 23%

Developer Tools

77% 77

Software Development

100 100%

Software Development

0% 0

DevOps Tools

0 0%

DevOps Tools

100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Jsonnet and Docker Swarm. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Jsonnet and Docker Swarm

Jsonnet Reviews

We have no reviews of Jsonnet yet.
Be the first one to post

Docker Swarm Reviews

Top 12 Kubernetes Alternatives to Choose From in 2023

With Docker Swarm, you can create and manage a cluster of Docker nodes, enabling the deployment and scaling of containerized applications across a distributed environment.

Source: humalect.com

11 Best Rancher Alternatives Multi Cluster Orchestration Platform

Next, we have Docker Swarm on our alternatives to rancher list. Docker Swarm is a lightweight container orchestration tool that lets you create, deploy and manage containerized applications. It is even one of the most popular container orchestration tools after Kubernetes.

Source: technicalustad.com

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes: how to choose a container orchestration tool

Docker Swarm is an open-source container orchestration platform built and maintained by Docker. Under the hood, Docker Swarm converts multiple Docker instances into a single virtual host. A Docker Swarm cluster generally contains three items:

Source: circleci.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Jsonnet seems to be a lot more popular than Docker Swarm. While we know about 37 links to Jsonnet, we've tracked only 3 mentions of Docker Swarm. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Jsonnet mentions (37)

Levels of Configuration Languages
Https://jsonnet.org/ I never heard of this before. This seems like the JSON I wish I really had. Of course at some point you could just use JavaScript. - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago
Standard ML idiosyncrasies
I've been reading the book Modern Compiler Implementation in ML lately. It's been helpful to brush up on some concepts while developing Tsonnet (my typed-aspiring Jsonnet flavor) and I hope to learn a ton more. However, I'm growing dissatisfied with some details -- not specifically the book, but the choice of the development environment. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
Tsonnet, a humble beginning
For the past 2 years, I've been working extensively with Jsonnet, a configuration language that augments JSON and helps eliminate repetition in our config files. It has its limits (many by design), which keeps the language simple to use. But there's one thing that keeps nagging at me when I'm deep in the code: what's the shape of the input or output of this function? And wouldn't it be great if we could type... - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
Refactor Terraform Resource Names By One Command
Jsonnet: Use --jsonnet (-j) for advanced, programmatically controlled renaming logic. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
Kubernetes 101: Introduction
Kubernetes does not provide or require a configuration language like Jsonnet, as it provides a declarative API that can be used with different types of declarative specifications. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago

Docker Swarm mentions (3)

Ask HN: Why did K8s win against Docker Swarm?
Docker Swarm Classic (https://github.com/docker-archive/classicswarm) is dead. Docker Swarm Mode is alive, and I know some people use it, but it's very niche compared to k8s. As someone who interacts with k8s regularly, I often feel like there is a place for a simpler k8s alternative. But looking at history I see the attempts like Swarm fail. What do you think played the decisive role in the k8s victory? Features,... - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
K8s vs Docker Swarm
So the thing is support for Swarm was delegated to Mirantis, https://www.mirantis.com/blog/mirantis-will-continue-to-support-and-develop-docker-swarm/ since it was delegated very little was done to move forward swarm _> https://github.com/moby/swarmkit/commits/master , docker swarm itself (docker the company) is deprecated https://github.com/docker-archive/classicswarm . I think because there's no way to... Source: about 2 years ago
#30DaysOfAppwrite: Docker Swarm Integration
Docker Swarm is a container orchestration tool built right into the Docker CLI which allows us to deploy our Docker services to a cluster of hosts, instead of just the one allowed with Docker Compose. This is known as Swarm Mode, not to be confused with the classic Docker Swarm that is no longer being developed as a standalone product. Docker Swarm works great with Appwrite as it builds upon the Compose... - Source: dev.to / about 4 years ago