Software Alternatives & Reviews

Protobuf VS Jsonnet

Compare Protobuf VS Jsonnet and see what are their differences

Protobuf logo Protobuf

Protocol buffers are a language-neutral, platform-neutral extensible mechanism for serializing structured data.

Jsonnet logo Jsonnet

A powerful DSL for elegant description of JSON data.
  • Protobuf Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-29
  • Jsonnet Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-26

Protobuf videos

StreamBerry, part 2 : introduction to Google ProtoBuf

Jsonnet videos

Jsonnet

More videos:

  • Review - Using Jsonnet to Package Together Dashboards, Alerts and Exporters - Tom Wilkie
  • Review - Webinar: Writing Less YAML – Using jsonnet and kubecfg to Manage Kubernetes Resources

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Protobuf and Jsonnet)
Configuration Management
56 56%
44% 44
Mobile Apps
60 60%
40% 40
Application And Data
100 100%
0% 0
Software Development
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Protobuf and Jsonnet. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Protobuf should be more popular than Jsonnet. It has been mentiond 82 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Protobuf mentions (82)

  • Developing games on and for Mac and Linux
    Protocol Buffers: https://developers.google.com/protocol-buffers. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • Adding Codable conformance to Union with Metaprogramming
    ProtocolBuffers’ OneOf message addresses the case of having a message with many fields where at most one field will be set at the same time. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Logcat is awful. What would you improve?
    That's definitely the bigger thing. I think something like Protocol Buffers (Protobuf) is what you're looking for there. Output the data and consume it by something that can handle the analysis. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Bitcoin is the "narrow waist" of internet-based value
    These protocols prevent an O(N x M) explosion of code that have to solve for many cases. For example, since JSON is an almost ubiquitous format for wire transfer (although other things do exist like protobufs), if I had N data formats that I want to serialize, I only need to write N serializers/deserializers (SerDes). If there was no such narrow waist and there were M alternatives to JSON in wide usage, I would... Source: over 1 year ago
  • Understanding gRPC Concepts, Use Cases & Best Practices
    gRPC uses protocol buffers (it is an open source message format) as the default method of communication between client and server. Also, gRPC uses HTTP/ 2 as the default protocol. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
View more

Jsonnet mentions (32)

  • A Reasonable Configuration Language
    Jsonnet[1] and kapitan[2] are the tools I currently use. Their learning curve is not optimal (and I tried to contribute to smoothen it with a jsonnet course[3] and a 'get started wit kapitan' blog post[4]), but once used to it it's hard to do without, and their combination makes them even more useful (esp. If you deploy K8s). In Ruud's case, Jsonnet might have been worth looking at as Hashicorp tools can be... - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
  • Pkl, a Programming Language for Configuration
    Kubernetes config is a decent example. I had ChatGPT generate a representative silly example -- the content doesn't matter so much as the structure: https://gist.github.com/cstrahan/528b00cd5c3a22e3d8f057bb1a75ea61 Now consider 100s (if not 1000s) of such files. I haven't given Pkl an in depth look yet, but I can say that the Industry Standard™ of "simple YAML" + string substitution (with delicate, error prone... - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
  • What Is Wrong with TOML?
    Maybe you'd like jsonnet: https://jsonnet.org/ I find it particularly useful for configurations that often have repeated boilerplate, like ansible playbooks or deploying a bunch of "similar-but" services to kubernetes (with https://tanka.dev). Dhall is also quite interesting, with some tradeoffs: https://dhall-lang.org/ A few years ago I did a small comparison by re-implementing one of my simpler ansible... - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
  • That people produce HTML with string templates is telling us something
    Apologies for the lack of context, and for missing this comment until today. Both are tools for defining kubernetes manifests (which are YAML) in a reusable manner. Jsonnet is a formally specified extension of JSON. It’s essentially a functional programming language (w/some object oriented features) that generates config files in JSON/YAML/etc, so it’s straightforward to determine whether an input file is valid,... - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago
  • TOML: Tom's Obvious Minimal Language
    I like Google's Jsonnet [1], which has all of this except for 4. Jsonnet is quite mature, with fairly wide language adoption, and has the benefit of supporting expressions, including conditionals, arithmetic, as well as being able to define reusable blocks inside function definitions or external files. It's not suitable as a serialization format, but great for config. It's popular in some circles, but I'm sad that... - Source: Hacker News / 12 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Protobuf and Jsonnet, you can also consider the following products

gRPC - Application and Data, Languages & Frameworks, Remote Procedure Call (RPC), and Service Discovery

Dhall Configuration Language - A non-repetitive alternative to YAML

Messagepack - An efficient binary serialization format.

YAML - YAML 1.2 --- YAML: YAML Ain't Markup Language

TOML - TOML - Tom's Obvious, Minimal Language

JSON - (JavaScript Object Notation) is a lightweight data-interchange format