Infura VS Lokalise

Infura is a provider of blockchain APIs and developer tools. This means that if you want to access the blockchain, you don't need to run a node yourself. Instead, you just access a friendly API, and Infura does all the heavy lifting for you. Infura is free and totally secure, as it doesn't store your private keys and doesn't have the ability to modify your transactions or replay them multiple times. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago

- WebSocket connection infura.io - Internal JSON RPC Errors when dealing with Metamask. Source: over 1 year ago

- The L2 nodes (and its JSON-RPC providers) may also implement a censorship rule based on local regulations (e.g., infura.io, and alchemy.io). Source: over 1 year ago

You can edit your host file https://www.google.com/search?q=how+to+edit+host+file change infura.io to 127.0.0.1. Source: over 1 year ago

Information collected by Infura when you use Infura as your default RPC provider in MetaMask. https://metamask.io/ (“MetaMask”) and https://infura.io/ (“Infura”) are both products offered by the Company and Infura is the default Remote Procedure Call (RPC) provider in MetaMask. When you use Infura as your default RPC provider in MetaMask, Infura will collect your IP address and your Ethereum wallet address when... Source: over 1 year ago

I'm pretty sure, you'll find companies like this one which provide a nice GUI for helping with l10n or this one which offers translation services or this page that offers to convert between different formats, one of which probably has a nice GUI tool. Found them by 20 secs of googling. Source: 11 months ago

Localise has no problem reading the json files or export to json, we recently started using it in collaboration with external translators. Source: about 1 year ago

Actually I don't have "my" app. But in our app we use https://lokalise.com/ to localize it even to Norwegian. Our team is not the most expensive company in the world btw. And we don't have 1B+ users all over the world. Source: about 1 year ago

Internationalization (i18n) pain for a documentation project is a process problem, not a feature gap. Documentation frameworks are not meant to translate your developer docs for you into the language of your choice. Some frameworks might offer i18n support, like the Crowdin support in Docusauraus v2. With Jekyll, you have to pick a theme like this one. I doubt if the reST or adoc frameworks would differ much from... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

I've been thinking about building a micro saas very similar to this after having so many issues coordinating the localization of several products I manage. The only robust options in the market are incredibly expensive (for example https://lokalise.com/). Source: over 1 year ago