Software Alternatives & Reviews

HTTP VS FileCoin

Compare HTTP VS FileCoin and see what are their differences

HTTP logo HTTP

is an application protocol for distributed, collaborative, and hypermedia information systems.

FileCoin logo FileCoin

Filecoin is a data storage network and electronic currency based on Bitcoin.
  • HTTP Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-12-21
  • FileCoin Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-09

HTTP videos

No HTTP videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

FileCoin videos

Filecoin is HOT Right now! But Will You Get BURNED?? 🤔

More videos:

  • Review - Filecoin Review: Here’s The Lowdown On FIL!! 📁
  • Review - Is it too late to buy Filecoin?! FIL 2021 Review

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to HTTP and FileCoin)
Web And Application Servers
Blockchain
0 0%
100% 100
Web Servers
100 100%
0% 0
Cloud Storage
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using HTTP and FileCoin. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare HTTP and FileCoin

HTTP Reviews

We have no reviews of HTTP yet.
Be the first one to post

FileCoin Reviews

Battle of decentralized storages: SiaCoin (SC) vs Storj (STORJ) vs Filecoin (FIL)
Filecoin is a coin that sits as the second layer of the IPFS (InterPlanetary File System) project, an open-source project designed to create a permanent, decentralized method of data storage and sharing. The network provides a decentralized hub on which people who have excess storage capacity can offer it to those in need of said capacity. Individuals and businesses pay to...

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, FileCoin seems to be a lot more popular than HTTP. While we know about 75 links to FileCoin, we've tracked only 7 mentions of HTTP. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

HTTP mentions (7)

  • Evolving the Web: Discovering the History of HTTP Versions
    HTTP/1.1 was such a game changer for the Internet that it works so well that even through two revisions, RFC 2616 published in June 1999 and RFC 7230– RFC 7235 published in June 2014, HTTP/1.1 was extremely stable until the release of HTTP/2.0 in 2014 — Nearly 18 years later. Before continuing to the next section about HTTP/2.0, let us revisit what journey HTTP/1.1 has been through. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
  • Poll: Are client web requests sent to upstream servers or downstream servers?
    On the one hand, it just seems natural that "upstream" refers to the inbound request being sent from one system to another. It takes effort (connection pooling, throttling, retries, etc.) to make a request to an (upstream) dependency, just as it takes effort to swim upstream. The response is (usually) easy... Just return it... hence, "downstream". Recall the usual meaning of "upload" and "download". Upstream seems... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
  • How to cache TCP, SSL handshake on ALB?
    To me it sounds like you’ve not solved this as the config you’ve mentioned is about preventing “illegal” (none RFC7230 ) requests, it isn’t really related to the problem you posted. Source: over 2 years ago
  • HTTP Protocol Overview
    The program you are using to send data to the server may or may not automatically determine the right content-type header for your data, and knowing how to set and check headers is an essential skill. To learn more about the HTTP protocol check out the MDN guide or read the official standard, RFC 7230. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • Show HN: Micro HTTP server in 22 lines of C
    It's neat, but I don't believe it is a compliant implementation of HTTP/1.1 (or 1.0). For example, it does not handle percent-encoded characters in the request URI.[1][2] [1]: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7230#section-3.1.1 [2]: https://www.w3.org/Protocols/HTTP/1.0/spec.html#Request-URI. - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago
View more

FileCoin mentions (75)

  • How Web3 Decentralization Can Dismantle Big Tech Monopolies in 2024
    For example, decentralized data storage projects like Filecoin, Arweave, and Sia posted 50-100% user growth, providing blockchain-powered alternatives to AWS, Google Cloud, and Dropbox for distributed app data security. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • I Moved My Blog from IPFS to a Server
    Filecoin, which is based on IPFS, creates a market for unused storage. I think that idea is great but for adoption it needs to be as simple as Dropbox to store files. But visit [filecoin.io](https://filecoin.io/) and the dropbox-like app that you could be willing to try is nowhere to be found. So maybe it is an enterprise solution? That isn't spelled out either. So I am not surprised that this has little trackion... - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
  • POKT Network and DePin
    Familiar DePIN initiatives include Helium, a Decentralized Wireless Network from 2019, Filecoin or Arweave for Cloud Storage. Source: 5 months ago
  • NFT Payload Storage Options
    Filecoin is a data storage network backed by an application token. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
  • Team develops a faster, cheaper way to train large language models
    Filecoin - A decentralized storage network where miners earn Filecoin by providing storage to clients. Source: 10 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing HTTP and FileCoin, you can also consider the following products

mini_httpd - mini_httpd is a small HTTP server for low or medium traffic sites.

IPFS - IPFS is the permanent web. A new peer-to-peer hypermedia protocol.

thttpd - thttpd is a simple, small, portable, fast, and secure HTTP server.

Sia - Sia - Decentralized data storage

micro_httpd - micro_httpd is a very small Unix-based HTTP server.

Storj.io - Storj DCS is a decentralized, encrypted and fast Amazon S3-compatible object storage.