No Gitless videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
Based on our record, Fork should be more popular than Gitless. It has been mentiond 89 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
This is unrelated to the tool called "Gitless": https://gitless.com/. - Source: dev.to / 20 days ago
One such project is the Gitless initiative which has a Python wrapper around Git proper providing far-simpler workflows based on some solid research. Unfortunately it doesn't look like Gitless' Python codebase has had active development recently, which doesn't inspire much confidence. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
You and me both. Git's interface has been very hard for me to understand (especially coming from Mercurial). I ended up finding Gitless (https://gitless.com), a wrapper around Git with a better interface, and loving it. - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago
> > To differentiate from Git Pijul should focus on usability... If Pijul has an easy to use interface like Mercurial did then that will massively help adoption. > I don't think the goal or differentiation of pijul is to be popular via good UI, though. If the theory of patches is good, it doesn't matter if pijul "wins" or not, as long as whatever does can integrate it. If the theory of patches is bad, I... - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
I'd like to think it was my project (https://github.com/martinvonz/jj), but other possibilities include Gitless (https://gitless.com/) or Bazaar (https://bazaar.canonical.com/). - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
Try Fork, it's still obviously git, but it's the easiest I've found so far: https://git-fork.com/. - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago
Agreed. I’d pay for this (I pay for [Fork][1]), but never as a subscription. [1]: https://git-fork.com. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
I find the GitHub Desktop tool to be rather clunky. I use git in various ways; * CLI for most small tasks * GUI for big tasks and getting an overview * Editor UI for small things if I am currently in the editor. * GitHub’s website for collaboration and GH specific tasks The GUI’s I use are: Git-Fork on macOS, Windows. Visually my favorite UI of all. https://git-fork.com Sublime Merge on macOS, Windows and Linux.... - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
Git Fork: a git client with a similar level of polish to Tower, but as a one-time purchase instead of a subscription product. https://git-fork.com/. - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago
I do most of my "git"ing on the command line, but sometimes I need a graphical user interface (GUI) to really understand what's going on. When I need that, I reach for Fork. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
Pro Git - The Git Book is the official tutorial about Git.
GitKraken - The intuitive, fast, and beautiful cross-platform Git client.
Pijul - Pijul is a free and open source distributed version control system based on a sound theory of...
GitHub Desktop - GitHub Desktop is a seamless way to contribute to projects on GitHub and GitHub Enterprise.
Learn Git Branching - "Learn Git Branching" is the most visual and interactive way to learn Git on the web; you'll be challenged with exciting levels, given step-by-step demonstrations of powerful features, and maybe even have a bit of fun along the way.
SourceTree - Mac and Windows client for Mercurial and Git.