Fork VS BoxyHQ
Compare Fork VS BoxyHQ and see what are their differences
Verify your customers in under 15 seconds anywhere in the world with a cutting-edge SaaS & API platform for Identity Verification and AML/KYC compliance.
featured
Fork
GitKraken
GitHub Desktop
SmartGit
SourceTree
TortoiseGit
tig
Sublime Merge
BoxyHQ
Auth0
Skyflow
Keycloak
Frontegg
WorkOS
FusionAuth
Dataset Search
SaaS, Premium Self-Hosted, or FREE OSS Self-Hosted
Enterprise Single Sign On (SSO) SAML SSO enables a secure authentication via an organization’s Identity Provider (IdP), as opposed to users or IT admins managing thousands, of usernames and passwords. With our product SAML Jackson, enterprise users can access your product via one of their secure IdPs (like Okta, Microsoft Azure, AWS, etc), which manages access and security for the entire organization.
Directory Sync Organizations use directories from different providers to manage users and enforce their access to organization resources. By integrating our Directory Sync product into your solution you can activate and deactivate user accounts, create groups, and keep your app in sync with the user directory in real-time. Supports the SCIM 2.0 protocol.
Additionally, we offer Audit Logs to track critical events in your application and a Data Privacy Vault to safeguard sensitive data.
Fork BoxyHQBoxyHQ's answer:
BoxyHQ stands out for its comprehensive suite of security building blocks tailored specifically for developers. With features like SAML/OIDC Single Sign-On (SSO) and Directory Sync with SCIM 2.0, BoxyHQ simplifies identity management and access control for B2B SaaS companies. Its focus on providing a seamless and customizable solution empowers developers to enhance security without compromising user experience. Additionally, BoxyHQ offers Audit Logs to track critical events within the product and a Privacy Vault, an API to protect sensitive data.
BoxyHQ's answer:
BoxyHQ stands out for several reasons:
BoxyHQ's answer:
BoxyHQ's primary audience encompasses:
BoxyHQ's answer:
The inception of BoxyHQ is deeply linked with Deepak's journey as the former CTO of a cybersecurity scaleup. In his role, Deepak wrestled with the challenge of allocating resources to enterprise compliance features that diverged from their core value proposition. Alongside Sama, they witnessed the escalating tide of cyber crimes, compounded by the concerning statistic that around 70% of development teams often bypass essential security measures due to time constraints. Motivated by this shared purpose of bringing security earlier in the developer live cycle, they embarked on a mission to address these challenges head-on. BoxyHQ emerged as a solution designed to automate product security and provide low-code APIs for seamless integration, empowering developers to implement enterprise-compliant security measures effortlessly. Through BoxyHQ, Deepak and the team strive to alleviate the burden on development teams while fortifying organizations against the escalating threats posed by cyber crimes.
BoxyHQ's answer:
We value the confidentiality of our large enterprise clients due to NDA agreements. However, some of our notable customers include Cal.com, Dub, Supademo, Spike, among many others.
BoxyHQ's answer:
BoxyHQ uses the following technologies: - Next.js - PostgreSQL - Docker - Kubernetes
Based on our record, Fork seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 84 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Finally, I didn't mention source code control. That topic is very personal to people. I don't tend to use my IDE for managing Git. I like to use something external that gives me a "best-in-breed" solution. That tool for me is Fork. I've shared this tool before, but never in an article. If you are like me and enjoy something visual and easy to work with, Fork fits those requirements. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
My favorite got GUI is Fork: https://git-fork.com/ It supports drag and drop for several operations including merge, rebase, and stage/unstage (and probably more). - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
They have a free trial to see if you like it: https://git-fork.com/. Source: 5 months ago
As the OP, along what axis do you want the VCS to be "better" than git? git's cli user interface is monstrous (yes, I know, you personally have 800 cli commands memorized and get them all right every time, that doesn't make it "good"). From the outset, the maintainers of got basically decided "it's too much work to make all the cli flags behave and interact consistently" so they didn't. This allowed git to grow... - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
Take a look at Fork. It's a really nice visual representation of repositories, commits, merges even merge conflicts can be solved within a really clean UI. Highly recommend. Source: 5 months ago
GitKraken - The intuitive, fast, and beautiful cross-platform Git client.
Auth0 - Auth0 is a program for people to get authentication and authorization services for their own business use.
GitHub Desktop - GitHub Desktop is a seamless way to contribute to projects on GitHub and GitHub Enterprise.
Skyflow - Skyflow’s data privacy vaults deliver security, compliance and governance via a simple API
SmartGit - SmartGit is a front-end for the distributed version control system Git and runs on Windows, Mac OS...
Keycloak - Open Source Identity and Access Management for modern Applications and Services.