FileCoin VS HTTP
Compare FileCoin VS HTTP and see what are their differences
LibHunt tracks mentions of software libraries on relevant social networks. Based on that data, you can find the most popular projects and their alternatives.
featured
FileCoin
IPFS
Sia
Storj.io
NFT Storage
Basic Attention Token (BAT)
Ethereum
Audius Music
HTTP
mini_httpd
thttpd
micro_httpd
IPFS
nginx
ZeroNet
XAMPP
FileCoin HTTPBased on our record, FileCoin seems to be a lot more popular than HTTP. While we know about 75 links to FileCoin, we've tracked only 7 mentions of HTTP. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
For example, decentralized data storage projects like Filecoin, Arweave, and Sia posted 50-100% user growth, providing blockchain-powered alternatives to AWS, Google Cloud, and Dropbox for distributed app data security. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
Filecoin, which is based on IPFS, creates a market for unused storage. I think that idea is great but for adoption it needs to be as simple as Dropbox to store files. But visit [filecoin.io](https://filecoin.io/) and the dropbox-like app that you could be willing to try is nowhere to be found. So maybe it is an enterprise solution? That isn't spelled out either. So I am not surprised that this has little trackion... - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
Familiar DePIN initiatives include Helium, a Decentralized Wireless Network from 2019, Filecoin or Arweave for Cloud Storage. Source: 6 months ago
Filecoin is a data storage network backed by an application token. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
Filecoin - A decentralized storage network where miners earn Filecoin by providing storage to clients. Source: 11 months ago
HTTP/1.1 was such a game changer for the Internet that it works so well that even through two revisions, RFC 2616 published in June 1999 and RFC 7230– RFC 7235 published in June 2014, HTTP/1.1 was extremely stable until the release of HTTP/2.0 in 2014 — Nearly 18 years later. Before continuing to the next section about HTTP/2.0, let us revisit what journey HTTP/1.1 has been through. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
On the one hand, it just seems natural that "upstream" refers to the inbound request being sent from one system to another. It takes effort (connection pooling, throttling, retries, etc.) to make a request to an (upstream) dependency, just as it takes effort to swim upstream. The response is (usually) easy... Just return it... hence, "downstream". Recall the usual meaning of "upload" and "download". Upstream seems... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
To me it sounds like you’ve not solved this as the config you’ve mentioned is about preventing “illegal” (none RFC7230 ) requests, it isn’t really related to the problem you posted. Source: over 2 years ago
The program you are using to send data to the server may or may not automatically determine the right content-type header for your data, and knowing how to set and check headers is an essential skill. To learn more about the HTTP protocol check out the MDN guide or read the official standard, RFC 7230. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
It's neat, but I don't believe it is a compliant implementation of HTTP/1.1 (or 1.0). For example, it does not handle percent-encoded characters in the request URI.[1][2] [1]: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7230#section-3.1.1 [2]: https://www.w3.org/Protocols/HTTP/1.0/spec.html#Request-URI. - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago
IPFS - IPFS is the permanent web. A new peer-to-peer hypermedia protocol.
mini_httpd - mini_httpd is a small HTTP server for low or medium traffic sites.
Sia - Sia - Decentralized data storage
thttpd - thttpd is a simple, small, portable, fast, and secure HTTP server.
Storj.io - Storj DCS is a decentralized, encrypted and fast Amazon S3-compatible object storage.
micro_httpd - micro_httpd is a very small Unix-based HTTP server.