Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Cryptomator VS OSXFUSE

Compare Cryptomator VS OSXFUSE and see what are their differences

Cryptomator logo Cryptomator

When it comes to saving your files on a cloud server, it is important to ensure the security of those files. Keeping your delicate files out of the wrong hands can save you a lot of time and hassle. Read more about Cryptomator.

OSXFUSE logo OSXFUSE

FUSE for OS X allows you to extend OS X's native file handling capabilities via third-party...
  • Cryptomator Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-12
  • OSXFUSE Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-15

Cryptomator features and specs

  • Open Source
    Cryptomator is open source, meaning its source code is available for review and audit by the community, ensuring transparency and trustworthiness.
  • User-Friendly
    The application has an intuitive and easy-to-use interface, making it accessible for users with varying levels of technical skill.
  • Encryption Standard
    Cryptomator uses AES (Advanced Encryption Standard) with 256-bit key length to secure your data, providing robust protection against unauthorized access.
  • Cross-Platform
    It supports multiple operating systems, including Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, and Android, allowing for seamless synchronization across devices.
  • No Account Required
    Users do not need to create an account to use Cryptomator, enhancing user privacy and data protection.
  • Integration with Cloud Services
    Cryptomator can integrate with various cloud storage solutions like Google Drive, Dropbox, and OneDrive, providing an extra layer of security for your cloud-stored files.

Possible disadvantages of Cryptomator

  • Performance Limitations
    Because files are encrypted and decrypted on-the-fly, the application may experience slower performance, especially for large files or folders.
  • Mobile App Cost
    While the desktop version is free, the mobile apps require a one-time purchase, which might deter some users.
  • No Native Cloud Backup
    Cryptomator itself does not offer native cloud backup services. Users must rely on third-party cloud providers for storing encrypted files.
  • No Live Collaboration Features
    The application does not support live collaboration on encrypted documents, limiting its utility for team-based projects.
  • Compatibility Issues
    Certain cloud providers may occasionally change their APIs or policies, potentially causing compatibility issues until updates are made.

OSXFUSE features and specs

  • User Space File Systems
    OSXFUSE allows the creation of fully functional file systems in user space. This facilitates development by not requiring changes to kernel code, reducing the risk of affecting system stability.
  • Flexibility
    Developers can implement a wide variety of file systems with different abstractions and benefits, tailored for specific tasks or unique applications.
  • Wide Range of Use Cases
    OSXFUSE supports various applications, from cloud storage solutions and encrypted file systems to unique file abstractions, making it versatile for different needs.
  • Community Support
    Being open-source, OSXFUSE benefits from community contributions, documentation, and shared implementations that can aid development and problem-solving.
  • Cross-Platform Development
    OSXFUSE's similarity to FUSE on other Unix-like systems simplifies cross-platform development and porting of file systems.

Possible disadvantages of OSXFUSE

  • Performance Overhead
    Running file system operations in user space can introduce additional latency compared to kernel-based file systems, potentially affecting performance.
  • Complex Configuration
    Setting up and configuring OSXFUSE and its corresponding file systems might be challenging, especially for users not familiar with terminal commands or file system concepts.
  • Security Concerns
    User space file systems could introduce security vulnerabilities if not implemented carefully, as bugs can lead to data corruption or unauthorized access.
  • Limited Kernel Integration
    Since OSXFUSE operates in user space, it may not have the same deep integration and performance optimizations available to in-kernel file systems.

Analysis of Cryptomator

Overall verdict

  • Cryptomator is a highly recommended tool for individuals seeking a secure and private method of encrypting files before uploading them to cloud storage. It strikes a balance between security and usability, making it appealing for both technical and non-technical users.

Why this product is good

  • Cryptomator is considered good because it provides client-side encryption, ensuring that only you have access to your files. It is open-source, which means its code is transparent and has been reviewed by the community, enhancing its security credibility. It's also user-friendly, allowing seamless integration with cloud storage providers and offering a zero-knowledge architecture, which means even their developers cannot access your data.

Recommended for

  • Individuals concerned about privacy and security of their data in the cloud.
  • Users looking for an open-source, community-reviewed encryption tool.
  • People who need a user-friendly encryption solution that works with various cloud storage services.
  • Those who prefer a service with a zero-knowledge policy, ensuring complete data confidentiality.

Cryptomator videos

Cryptomator Tutorial: Get Started

More videos:

  • Tutorial - How To Easily Encrypt Anything - Cryptomator The Best FREE Encryption Software! (multiplatform)
  • Review - Cryptomator and Nextcloud

OSXFUSE videos

Apple: OSXFuse & VeraCrypt on Big Sur: OSXFuse seems to be missing on your machine (2 Solutions!!)

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Cryptomator and OSXFUSE)
Cloud Storage
91 91%
9% 9
File Sharing
100 100%
0% 0
Storage
0 0%
100% 100
Security & Privacy
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Cryptomator and OSXFUSE. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Cryptomator and OSXFUSE

Cryptomator Reviews

6 TrueCrypt Alternatives for Reliable Data Encryption
Cryptomator is a great free encryption software tool for users looking to encrypt individual files rather than a large volume of data as seen with TrueCrypt or other alternatives mentioned here. This makes sense if you update only a few files regularly and the rest of your files remain relatively unchanged. Cryptomator is supported on Windows, Mac, and Linux operating...
15 Best Rclone Alternatives 2022
With Cryptomator, what you get is a simple digital protection tool. Rclone syncs your files to cloud storage, while Cryptomator syncs and locks your files to cloud storage. Cryptomator gives you access to your files on any device and only you hold the keys to access them.
5 Best TrueCrypt Alternatives - Open source encryption apps
Cryptomator for the desktop works on a pay what you want model. It can be had for free, but users are encouraged to donate towards its development. The mobile apps (which support fingerprint unlock) cost $8.99 at time of writing.
Source: proprivacy.com
16 Tresorit Alternatives
Cryptomator will be giving you the full permission in which you can choose to encrypt the whole of your data on your series of workstations or top of any cloud devices or any storage media. It will be working all through the creation of the virtual device right through which the encrypted content can be readily displayed.

OSXFUSE Reviews

We have no reviews of OSXFUSE yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Cryptomator should be more popular than OSXFUSE. It has been mentiond 298 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Cryptomator mentions (298)

  • Owning my own data, part 1: Integrating a self-hosted calendar solution
    I know this is not what people want to hear, but your data will never be safer than it is in the cloud. No setup you can dream up at home with in a reasonable budget will ever come close to the resilience and redundancy you have in the cloud. Ownership is not about storing everything at home (or well, it's part of it), but having control over your data, which you can easily have while at the same time using the... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 months ago
  • Apple pulls data protection tool after UK government security row
    It's a drag that we're seeing this crap happen, but authoritarians will be authoritarians. What's the general opinion of tools like Cryptomator? [^1] [^1]: https://cryptomator.org. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
  • Cryptomator: end-to-end encrypt files in any cloud
    To prevent this from happening, you can use a tool like Cryptomator to automatically encrypt your files before uploading them to the cloud. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
  • Dropbox: How to opt out of 3rd party AI partner access to your Dropbox
    The best way to do this is with https://cryptomator.org. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Is it private if I lock my pdf
    Before putting anything on a cloud service I would recommend 3rd party tools, like Cryptomator, to encrypt folders and such, then upload to a cloud service. Source: over 1 year ago
View more

OSXFUSE mentions (31)

  • Please someone save me from file sharing hell to windows
    I didn't exactly use any 'tutorial'. Assumming you can already SSH to the target machine, you just need to install both these pkgs then reboot to 1TR Recovery Mode and choosing Reduced Security and choose to enable Kernel Extension and then reboot again goto Security & Privacy and Allow the extension, and that's it you can now use it. Source: over 1 year ago
  • How do I fix this?
    Weird. Where did you download (lat/new)est MacFuse from? https://osxfuse.github.io/ I hope! Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Ask HN: What are some good resources for learning about low level disk/file IO?
    I lead a project that included shipping a filesystem driver and a virtual disk on Windows. What I did to learn the lower-level APIs, and perform initial testing on the driver, was write a "mirror" drive. The user-mode code pointed to a folder on disk, the driver made a virtual disk drive, and all reads and writes in the virtual disk drive went to the mirror folder. On Windows, you can implement something like that... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
  • Possible to use VeraCrypt without OSXFuse
    "FUSE-T is a kext-less implementation of FUSE for macOS that uses NFS v4 local server instead of a kernel extension. The main motivation for this project is to replace macfuse (https://osxfuse.github.io/) that implements its own kext to make fuse work. With each version of macOS it's getting harder and harder to load kernel extensions. Apple strongly discourages it and, for this reason, software distributions... Source: about 2 years ago
  • mount harddisk with different formats
    Macos doesn’t support many Linux file system formats. You’ll have to use something like macFUSE https://osxfuse.github.io/. Source: about 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Cryptomator and OSXFUSE, you can also consider the following products

VeraCrypt - VeraCrypt is a free open source disk encryption software for Windows, Mac OSX and Linux.

Tuxera NTFS for Mac - Microsoft NTFS for Mac by Tuxera brings reliable read-write compatibility for all NTFS-formatted USB drives on your Mac. Try free for 15 days.

BoxCryptor - Boxcryptor encrypts your sensitive files before uploading them to cloud storage services like Dropbox, Google Drive, Microsoft OneDrive, Box, and many others.

Mounty for NTFS - A tiny tool to re-mount write-protected NTFS volumes under Mac OS X 10.9+ in read-write mode.

Mega - Secure File Storage and collaboration

Paragon ExtFS - Provides MacOS and Windows machines native access to the Linux OS ext file system family.