Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Cirrus CSS VS Asana

Compare Cirrus CSS VS Asana and see what are their differences

Cirrus CSS logo Cirrus CSS

The SCSS framework for the modern web. It's component based, customizable, and completely open source.

Asana logo Asana

Asana project management is an effort to re-imagine how we work together, through modern productivity software. Fast and versatile, Asana helps individuals and groups get more done.
  • Cirrus CSS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-08-03

Cirrus is a modular, responsive, and component centric SCSS framework aimed at bringing beautiful, hassle-free styling. Cirrus works right away with minimal styling. From there, add components and tweak using utility classes to make it truly your own.

  • Asana Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-10

Cirrus CSS

Pricing URL
-
$ Details
free
Release Date
2022 March

Asana

Website
asana.com
$ Details
freemium $11.99 / Monthly (Per user - Premium)
Release Date
-

Cirrus CSS videos

No Cirrus CSS videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Asana videos

Asana Review + Demo: Top 5 Reasons Asana Is The Best Project and Team Management Tool

More videos:

  • Review - Asana: Full Review (2019) (with timestamps)
  • Review - Asana Warning! Top 5 Reasons To Avoid Asana Project Manager (Before You Buy Asana Review)

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Cirrus CSS and Asana)
CSS Framework
100 100%
0% 0
Project Management
0 0%
100% 100
Design Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Task Management
0 0%
100% 100

Questions and Answers

As answered by people managing Cirrus CSS and Asana.

Which are the primary technologies used for building your product?

Cirrus CSS's answer

Cirrus is possible thanks to open source contributors on Dart Sass and True (Sass unit testing framework).

What makes your product unique?

Cirrus CSS's answer

There are often debates on whether component-centric frameworks such as Bootstrap or atomic-classed frameworks such as Tailwind are better for its: - Learning curve - Maintainability - Flexibility - Ease of use

I am a fan of both frameworks as they have their strengths depending on the situation. With component-based frameworks, it is quite easy to slap a couple of different elements together and you have a working website. However, customization may require writing lots of other CSS yourself which takes time away from building your product. Utility-class-based frameworks offer customization that is as granular as it gets short of writing the CSS yourself but without the overhead. A major drawback is that being able to customize and use tree shaking requires direct integration of Tailwind into your project and a CDN version is not feasible for production.

Cirrus is a framework that takes the best parts of both of these types of frameworks and provides: - Many pre-built basic components to accelerate your development velocity (e.g. Avatars, Modals, Tabs, etc.). To keep your code clean, all component classes are built following the BEM convention. - A suite of common utility classes to help tweak and polish your designs when needed. These utility classes are so powerful that you can construct components with them alone. - Different CDN builds of the framework that can be dropped in at any browser (core, ext, all). Choose one that fits your needs.

With the release of 0.7, much of the framework can now be customized. Since the framework is written entirely in SCSS, it can take advantage of all the existing APIs for class generation. The new configuration system in Cirrus allows you to: - Add/Edit/Delete component styles. - Add/Edit/Delete utility classes. - Specify which breakpoints are supported. - Toggle which classes should have viewport variants (to help save on build size). - Enable/Disable different parts of the framework. - And more :)

What's the story behind your product?

Cirrus CSS's answer

Started in late 2016, Cirrus was built as a side project of mine to foray into web development. Since then it has grown immensely with the addition of components, more utility classes, CSS grid, etc. My main goal for this framework is to make web development as painless as possible -- and that always starts with great documentation and consistency in design choices.

User comments

Share your experience with using Cirrus CSS and Asana. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Cirrus CSS and Asana

Cirrus CSS Reviews

15 Top Bootstrap Alternatives For Frontend Developers in 2024
Regarding its extensive suite of components, Cirrus not only provides base styles for page layouts but also a variety of different components. It works immediately with minimal styling. From there, you can add components and customize using utility classes to truly make it your own.
Source: coursesity.com

Asana Reviews

  1. Good, but not the best.

    While Asana is a robust task management and project planning tool, in my experience, it falls slightly short when compared to Trello, particularly in terms of user-friendliness and simplicity. Asana offers a variety of features such as multiple project views (list, board, timeline, calendar), custom fields, and reporting tools, which can be highly beneficial for complex project management. However, I found that the learning curve can be steep, especially for team members not familiar with this type of software. The interface, while feature-rich, can feel a bit cluttered and overwhelming for new users. On the other hand, Trello shines in its simplicity and straightforward design. The visual card and board system is intuitive and easy to grasp, making it a more accessible tool for team members of varying tech proficiency levels. Additionally, Trello's user interface is cleaner and more streamlined, which contributes to an overall more enjoyable user experience.

    In terms of collaboration, both tools provide good collaborative features like commenting, tagging, and task assignment. However, I appreciate Trello's flexibility with its Power-Ups, allowing integration with a wide array of apps which enhances its functionality. In conclusion, while Asana is a powerful tool with extensive features, I prefer Trello for its ease of use, simplicity, and intuitive design. However, I do see the value of Asana for larger teams or more complex projects.

    🏁 Competitors: Trello
  2. A Solid Project Management Tool, but Not the Best on the Market

    Asana is a popular project management tool that has a lot to offer. It is fast and versatile, making it easy for individuals and teams to collaborate and get things done. The interface is clean and user-friendly, and there are plenty of features to help you organise and track your projects.

    However, while Asana is a good tool, it is not the best on the market. One of its main weaknesses is its lack of advanced reporting and analysis capabilities. It can be challenging to get a comprehensive view of your projects and how they are progressing, especially if you have a large number of them.

    Another issue is the cost. Asana can be expensive for teams with a lot of members, especially when compared to other project management tools that offer similar features at a lower price point.

    🏁 Competitors: Trello
    πŸ‘ Pros:    Fast|Clean ui|Excellent features
    πŸ‘Ž Cons:    No reporting|Expensive
  3. Coordinate and manage in teams the tasks and the circulation of work of a plan.

    Asana is a very representative app for the work environment I'm a part of with team members and users it's stellar for: β€’ To manage it on the web and portable devices β€’ With option and manageability on the web β€’ To set up projects and invite team members. β€’ The projects have a roadmap to know the displacement of each activity. β€’ Tasks can contain subtasks to keep track of work β€’ Allows granting tasks, define expiration periods. β€’ Effective and useful for adding files, making comments, and tags.

    🏁 Competitors: Trello, Wrike
    πŸ‘ Pros:    Asana proceeds effectively by promoting and supporting the work plan process for each project in terms of: β€’ to arrange and establish the work to be executed for a given project. β€’ to distribute and share among the members the tasks of a project. β€’ flexible to locate and work those minimum activities of a task. β€’ to fix and assign who will be in charge of the tasks. β€’ it is consistent to fix the structured tasks and visualize the phases and their movements. β€’ to set dates for a project from start to finish. β€’ with the option to handle related tasks that in one way or another are dependent on each other.
    πŸ‘Ž Cons:    Asana, is substantial to give continuity to the acquired commitments, it gathers everything necessary for the satisfactory completion of the work plans, being so it is a fantastic application as long as i have no adverse consequences while i am using it.

The Ultimate List of 20 Best AI Work Management Tools
Asana Intelligence: Asana leverages AI algorithms to provide task recommendations, goal-based resource management, and health checks based on historical data and user behavior, helping users prioritize and manage tasks more efficiently.
Source: ppm.express
12 Best ClickUp Alternatives for Innovative Management in 2023
Benefits of Asana compared to ClickUp: Asana has a simpler layout, which most users love compared to ClickUp. ClickUp lacks visibility of team workload, while Asana has a dedicated feature that gives valuable insights into how projects develop. Asana also lets managers track goals and monitor team performance which is essential for reporting.
Source: ayanza.com
Breeze vs. Asana - The best Asana alternative is Breeze
What is the difference between Breeze and Asana? The main reason to use Breeze instead of Asana is because it is faster, simpler and easier. When using Breeze you can talk to a real person about everything - we listen to your feedback, add features you need, and evolve with our users.
Source: www.breeze.pm
12 BEST Wrike Alternatives for Project Management in 2022
Asana is an ideal project management software for small teams. It is available in three different versions Free, Premium & Enterprise.
Source: www.guru99.com
14 Best Wrike Alternatives For Project Management In 2022
Asana and Wrike are similar in their β€œfreemium” payment model, but differ in some other basic capacities. Wrike has more of a set structure for project management, whereas Asana has greater flexibility, similar to Hive. Project views in Asana include list, boards, timeline and portfolios, whereas Wrike has a Gantt view, timelog view, table view, analytics view, file view,...
Source: hive.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Asana seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 86 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Cirrus CSS mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Cirrus CSS yet. Tracking of Cirrus CSS recommendations started around Aug 2021.

Asana mentions (86)

View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Cirrus CSS and Asana, you can also consider the following products

Semantic UI - A UI Component library implemented using a set of specifications designed around natural language

Trello - Infinitely flexible. Incredibly easy to use. Great mobile apps. It's free. Trello keeps track of everything, from the big picture to the minute details.

Materialize CSS - A modern responsive front-end framework based on Material Design

Wrike - Wrike is a flexible, scalable, and easy-to-use collaborative work management software that helps high-performance teams organize and accomplish their work. Try it now.

Bootstrap - Simple and flexible HTML, CSS, and JS for popular UI components and interactions

Basecamp - A simple and elegant project management system.