Cirrus is a modular, responsive, and component centric SCSS framework aimed at bringing beautiful, hassle-free styling. Cirrus works right away with minimal styling. From there, add components and tweak using utility classes to make it truly your own.
Lightweight
Cirrus CSS is designed to be lightweight, meaning it doesn't add a lot of overhead to your web project, which can result in faster loading times.
Responsive Design
The framework includes responsive utilities that make it easier to create mobile-friendly designs with minimal effort.
Modern Look
Cirrus offers a modern aesthetic with a collection of design elements that can give your project a contemporary appearance.
Ease of Use
The framework is simple to set up and integrate into projects, allowing developers to get started quickly without extensive configuration.
Customization
Cirrus CSS offers customization options that allow developers to tailor styles and designs to their specific needs.
Promote Cirrus CSS. You can add any of these badges on your website.
Cirrus is possible thanks to open source contributors on Dart Sass and True (Sass unit testing framework).
There are often debates on whether component-centric frameworks such as Bootstrap or atomic-classed frameworks such as Tailwind are better for its: - Learning curve - Maintainability - Flexibility - Ease of use
I am a fan of both frameworks as they have their strengths depending on the situation. With component-based frameworks, it is quite easy to slap a couple of different elements together and you have a working website. However, customization may require writing lots of other CSS yourself which takes time away from building your product. Utility-class-based frameworks offer customization that is as granular as it gets short of writing the CSS yourself but without the overhead. A major drawback is that being able to customize and use tree shaking requires direct integration of Tailwind into your project and a CDN version is not feasible for production.
Cirrus is a framework that takes the best parts of both of these types of frameworks and provides: - Many pre-built basic components to accelerate your development velocity (e.g. Avatars, Modals, Tabs, etc.). To keep your code clean, all component classes are built following the BEM convention. - A suite of common utility classes to help tweak and polish your designs when needed. These utility classes are so powerful that you can construct components with them alone. - Different CDN builds of the framework that can be dropped in at any browser (core, ext, all). Choose one that fits your needs.
With the release of 0.7, much of the framework can now be customized. Since the framework is written entirely in SCSS, it can take advantage of all the existing APIs for class generation. The new configuration system in Cirrus allows you to: - Add/Edit/Delete component styles. - Add/Edit/Delete utility classes. - Specify which breakpoints are supported. - Toggle which classes should have viewport variants (to help save on build size). - Enable/Disable different parts of the framework. - And more :)
Started in late 2016, Cirrus was built as a side project of mine to foray into web development. Since then it has grown immensely with the addition of components, more utility classes, CSS grid, etc. My main goal for this framework is to make web development as painless as possible -- and that always starts with great documentation and consistency in design choices.
We have collected here some useful links to help you find out if Cirrus CSS is good.
Check the traffic stats of Cirrus CSS on SimilarWeb. The key metrics to look for are: monthly visits, average visit duration, pages per visit, and traffic by country. Moreoever, check the traffic sources. For example "Direct" traffic is a good sign.
Check the "Domain Rating" of Cirrus CSS on Ahrefs. The domain rating is a measure of the strength of a website's backlink profile on a scale from 0 to 100. It shows the strength of Cirrus CSS's backlink profile compared to the other websites. In most cases a domain rating of 60+ is considered good and 70+ is considered very good.
Check the "Domain Authority" of Cirrus CSS on MOZ. A website's domain authority (DA) is a search engine ranking score that predicts how well a website will rank on search engine result pages (SERPs). It is based on a 100-point logarithmic scale, with higher scores corresponding to a greater likelihood of ranking. This is another useful metric to check if a website is good.
The latest comments about Cirrus CSS on Reddit. This can help you find out how popualr the product is and what people think about it.
Cirrus CSS has been gaining traction among front-end developers seeking an efficient and streamlined CSS framework alternative to well-established options like Bootstrap and Tailwind CSS. As reflected in recent discussions and articles, public opinion about Cirrus CSS typically focuses on its balance between simplicity and functionality, as well as its potential to provide a minimalistic yet effective solution for UI design.
Comprehensive Component Suite: Cirrus CSS is particularly lauded for its extensive suite of components, which provides a solid foundation for developing web pages. The framework offers a broad range of pre-built components that can address standard UI needs with minimal initial styling. This feature is particularly appealing to developers who wish to speed up their design process without compromising on quality or functionality.
Customization with Utility Classes: One of the most appreciated aspects of Cirrus CSS is its utility class system. This characteristic is noted for allowing developers to easily customize the look and feel of components to align with specific project requirements. By offering a flexible structure, Cirrus enables a personalized development experience, where developers can fine-tune their designs with precise control over styles.
Ease of Use: Many developers have commended Cirrus CSS for being easy to get started with, which is crucial for both new and experienced developers looking to integrate it into their workflow quickly. This ease of use often translates to faster project completion times, thus increasing productivity and reducing development overhead.
Comparison to Competitors: In the ecosystem of CSS frameworks, Cirrus competes alongside popular names such as Bootstrap, Tailwind CSS, and Materialize CSS. Compared to Bootstrap, Cirrus CSS is often preferred for its lightweight nature and less opinionated approach, which offers more flexibility for customization. Unlike Tailwind CSS, which is primarily utility-first, Cirrus allows a hybrid approach with base styles complemented by utility classes. This can be an advantage for developers who prefer to start with styled components and then tweak their designs as needed.
Design Philosophy: Cirrus CSS is designed with minimalism in mind, aiming to provide essential styling components without overwhelming developers with bloated features. This philosophy resonates well with the current trend towards lean and efficient front-end development practices, which favors frameworks that enhance responsiveness and performance.
Overall, Cirrus CSS is well-regarded in the developer community for its capability to facilitate rapid development while maintaining flexibility and minimalism. Its collection of components, combined with utility classes, makes it an attractive choice for developers seeking a straightforward yet adaptable CSS framework. Though it may lack the extensive resources or user base associated with larger competitors, Cirrus's simplicity and effectiveness build a compelling case for its adoption in projects where focus and efficiency are paramount. Its growing popularity suggests that Cirrus will continue to be a relevant and valuable tool for front-end developers well into the coming years.
Do you know an article comparing Cirrus CSS to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
Is Cirrus CSS good? This is an informative page that will help you find out. Moreover, you can review and discuss Cirrus CSS here. The primary details have been verified within the last quarter. So they could be considered up to date. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.
