Buddy VS Meson

Buddy Reviews

1. firomero    

   Developer at Codechanic | about 3 years ago
   Buddy Rocks

   I have around two years when met buddy for my personal projects. I found it intuitive and great. I almost can set up pipelines with closed eyes. It helped me with development and learning. I recommend also startups and mature projects.

   🏁 Competitors: Jenkins

   👍 Pros:    Intuitive|Easy to use|Verbose|Great user experience

   👎 Cons:    A bit expensive
2. Jalib Hussain Khan    

   Software Engineer at All Resource Technologies | about 3 years ago
   Best there ever was

   Buddy works is the most awesome automating CI application, it lets you deploy sites at the best convenience. It also automatically detects the type of language your application uses and gives you the recommendation regarding the commands which should be executed

   🏁 Competitors: CircleCI, Codeship, Travis CI
3. Lucas Pereira    

   CTO at Tezus | about 3 years ago
   The best solution for continuous delivery

   I have a eCommerce company and the Buddy helps us to delivery all projects and maintain the our platform updated. The Buddy is easy to implements and easy to operate, definitively, the best solution

   🏁 Competitors: CircleCI, Travis CI

   👍 Pros:    Easy to use|Easy user interface|Easy integration|Fast|Database documentation|Tools integrations|Visual

   👎 Cons:    Higher base price

Meson Reviews

Buddy mentions (10)

• Most Useful CI/CD Tools for DevOps

  Buddy CI/CD is an automation platform designed to streamline and accelerate software development and deployment processes. By emphasizing simplicity and efficiency, Buddy offers an intuitive UI that allows teams to set up, monitor, and execute pipelines with minimal friction. - Source: dev.to / 16 days ago

• We use GitHub Actions to build GitHub

  We switched to buddy.works[0] about a year ago and honestly it’s just been… smooth. The UI is just great, the wealth and breadth of options is ever increasing and all the basics like knowing what went wrong, restarting, debugging, duplicating etc just work as you’d expect. One of the few companies I can recommend. [0] https://buddy.works. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago

• Learn to push an empty commit

  For continuous integration, we are using Buddy delivery pipelines which allow us to build, test and deploy applications on a single push to a specific git branch. It helps us to reduce the manual overhead of deploying code to the server and handle all the actions automatically. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago

• Free for dev - list of software (SaaS, PaaS, IaaS, etc.)

  Buddy.works — A CI/CD with 5 free projects and 1 concurrent runs (120 executions/month). - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago

• Hide & Seek Code: Part II

  That is when we found out about Buddy. Buddy is one of those easy DIY devops tools out there. Best part is the UI and how easy it is to create a deployment pipeline. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago

Meson mentions (43)

• Rust Without Crates.io

  I went to mesonbuild.org and it doesn't match the description (some sort of betting site? I didn't stick around ...), and a search turned up: https://mesonbuild.com/. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago

• Makefile Tutorial

  Came here to post the same. The answer for How to build software? is Meson[1] for C and C++ and also other languages. Works well on Windows and Mac, too. I’ve written a small Makefile to learn the basic and backgrounds. Make is fine. But the next high-level would have been Autotools, which is an intimidating and weird set of tools. Most new stuff written in C/C++ use now Meson and it feels sane. [1]... - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago

• CMake x make?

  If you are very fortunate, you'll be able to choose something else. I like meson myself: it looks a bit like python, it's popular, small, simple, well-documented, easy to install and update, and it works well everywhere. Source: 8 months ago

• C++ Papercuts

  I suggest changing the build tool. Meson improved C and C++ a lot: https://mesonbuild.com/ The dependency declaration and auto-detection is nice. But the hidden extra is WrapDB, built-in package management (if wanted):

      https://mesonbuild.com/Wrap-dependency-system-manual.html.

  - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago

• A Modern C Development Environment

  > C's only REAL problem (in my opinion) which is the lack of dependency management. Most everything else can be done with a makefile and a half decent editor. Care to hear about our lord and saviour Meson? Both of your quoted problems are mutually incompatible: dependency management isn't the job of the compiler, it's a job for the build or host system. If you want to keep writing makefiles, be prepared to write... - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago