Buddy VS CMake

Buddy Reviews

1. firomero    

   Developer at Codechanic | about 3 years ago
   Buddy Rocks

   I have around two years when met buddy for my personal projects. I found it intuitive and great. I almost can set up pipelines with closed eyes. It helped me with development and learning. I recommend also startups and mature projects.

   🏁 Competitors: Jenkins

   👍 Pros:    Intuitive|Easy to use|Verbose|Great user experience

   👎 Cons:    A bit expensive
2. Jalib Hussain Khan    

   Software Engineer at All Resource Technologies | about 3 years ago
   Best there ever was

   Buddy works is the most awesome automating CI application, it lets you deploy sites at the best convenience. It also automatically detects the type of language your application uses and gives you the recommendation regarding the commands which should be executed

   🏁 Competitors: CircleCI, Codeship, Travis CI
3. Lucas Pereira    

   CTO at Tezus | about 3 years ago
   The best solution for continuous delivery

   I have a eCommerce company and the Buddy helps us to delivery all projects and maintain the our platform updated. The Buddy is easy to implements and easy to operate, definitively, the best solution

   🏁 Competitors: CircleCI, Travis CI

   👍 Pros:    Easy to use|Easy user interface|Easy integration|Fast|Database documentation|Tools integrations|Visual

   👎 Cons:    Higher base price

CMake Reviews

Buddy mentions (10)

• Most Useful CI/CD Tools for DevOps

  Buddy CI/CD is an automation platform designed to streamline and accelerate software development and deployment processes. By emphasizing simplicity and efficiency, Buddy offers an intuitive UI that allows teams to set up, monitor, and execute pipelines with minimal friction. - Source: dev.to / 29 days ago

• We use GitHub Actions to build GitHub

  We switched to buddy.works[0] about a year ago and honestly it’s just been… smooth. The UI is just great, the wealth and breadth of options is ever increasing and all the basics like knowing what went wrong, restarting, debugging, duplicating etc just work as you’d expect. One of the few companies I can recommend. [0] https://buddy.works. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago

• Learn to push an empty commit

  For continuous integration, we are using Buddy delivery pipelines which allow us to build, test and deploy applications on a single push to a specific git branch. It helps us to reduce the manual overhead of deploying code to the server and handle all the actions automatically. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago

• Free for dev - list of software (SaaS, PaaS, IaaS, etc.)

  Buddy.works — A CI/CD with 5 free projects and 1 concurrent runs (120 executions/month). - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago

• Hide & Seek Code: Part II

  That is when we found out about Buddy. Buddy is one of those easy DIY devops tools out there. Best part is the UI and how easy it is to create a deployment pipeline. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago

CMake mentions (51)

• Top 7 C++ Tools to explore in 2024 if it's not already the case.

  CMake stands for "Cross-platform Make" and is an open-source, platform-independent build system. It's designed to build, test, and package software projects written in C and C++, but it can also be used for other languages. Here's an overview of CMake and its features:. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago

• My first Software Release using GitHub Release

  When doing research for this lab exercise I looked at both vcpkg and conan. Both are package managers that would automate the installation and configuration of my program with its dependencies. However, when it came to releasing and sharing my program my options were limited. For example, the central public registry for conan packages is conan-center, but these packages are curated and the process is very... - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago

• A little help for a C++ newbie

  Install the CMake program using your system package manager, e.g. Sudo apt-get install cmake. Source: 7 months ago

• Questions Regarding working with Mingw_w64, MSYS2, and CMake on Windows

  Oh I just assumed it was talking about the one from cmake.org since I was having trouble. I can now confirm that mingw-w64-cmake and the binary from cmake.org do operate in mostly identical ways. Source: about 1 year ago

• Questions Regarding working with Mingw_w64, MSYS2, and CMake on Windows

  Then looking at any one of the many examples provided on cmake.org, it's clearly a viable way to do set(CMAKE_*), (e.g., set(CMAKE_CXX_STANDARD 11) Set(CMAKE_CXX_STANDARD_REQUIRED True)). Of course, another way to set these variables is to use the -D flag as you suggested, but I was just wondering why you would prohibit using set(CMAKE_*). Source: about 1 year ago