Meson VS Travis CI
Compare Meson VS Travis CI and see what are their differences
B2B SaaS: Make your app enterprise-ready!
Authentication - SAML/OIDC SSO, Directory Sync (SCIM 2.0), Audit Logs, Data Privacy Vault, and more!
featured
Meson
Ninja Build
CMake
GNU Make
SCons
Apache Maven
npm
Buck
Travis CI
Jenkins
CircleCI
Codeship
Buddy
Bitrise
Bamboo
TeamCity
Meson Travis CIBased on our record, Meson should be more popular than Travis CI. It has been mentiond 43 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
I went to mesonbuild.org and it doesn't match the description (some sort of betting site? I didn't stick around ...), and a search turned up: https://mesonbuild.com/. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
Came here to post the same. The answer for How to build software? is Meson[1] for C and C++ and also other languages. Works well on Windows and Mac, too. I’ve written a small Makefile to learn the basic and backgrounds. Make is fine. But the next high-level would have been Autotools, which is an intimidating and weird set of tools. Most new stuff written in C/C++ use now Meson and it feels sane. [1]... - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
If you are very fortunate, you'll be able to choose something else. I like meson myself: it looks a bit like python, it's popular, small, simple, well-documented, easy to install and update, and it works well everywhere. Source: 8 months ago
I suggest changing the build tool. Meson improved C and C++ a lot: https://mesonbuild.com/ The dependency declaration and auto-detection is nice. But the hidden extra is WrapDB, built-in package management (if wanted):- Source: Hacker News / 9 months agohttps://mesonbuild.com/Wrap-dependency-system-manual.html.
> C's only REAL problem (in my opinion) which is the lack of dependency management. Most everything else can be done with a makefile and a half decent editor. Care to hear about our lord and saviour Meson? Both of your quoted problems are mutually incompatible: dependency management isn't the job of the compiler, it's a job for the build or host system. If you want to keep writing makefiles, be prepared to write... - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
We used Travis CI for our continuous integration (CI) pipeline. Travis is a highly popular CI on Github and its build matrix feature is useful for repositories which contain multiple projects like Grab's. We configured Travis to do the following:. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
CI/CD for autobuild + autotests (Codemagic or Travis CI). Source: over 1 year ago
Step 2: Log on to Travis CI and sign up with your GitHub account used above. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
Some other hosted CI products, such as CircleCI and Travis Cl, are completely hosted in the cloud. It is becoming more popular for small organizations to use hosted CI products, as they allow engineering teams to begin continuous integration as soon as possible. Source: almost 3 years ago
1. Let's create the account. Access the site https://travis-ci.com/ and click on the button Sign up. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
Ninja Build - Ninja is a small build system with a focus on speed.
Jenkins - Jenkins is an open-source continuous integration server with 300+ plugins to support all kinds of software development
CMake - CMake is an open-source, cross-platform family of tools designed to build, test and package software.
CircleCI - CircleCI gives web developers powerful Continuous Integration and Deployment with easy setup and maintenance.
GNU Make - GNU Make is a tool which controls the generation of executables and other non-source files of a program from the program's source files.
Codeship - Codeship is a fast and secure hosted Continuous Delivery platform that scales with your needs.