Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Backbone.js VS Sandpack by CodeSandbox

Compare Backbone.js VS Sandpack by CodeSandbox and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Backbone.js logo Backbone.js

Give your JS App some Backbone with Models, Views, Collections, and Events

Sandpack by CodeSandbox logo Sandpack by CodeSandbox

Sandpack is a toolkit for building live coding experiences that run fully in the browser.
  • Backbone.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-09-30
  • Sandpack by CodeSandbox Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-03

Backbone.js features and specs

  • Lightweight
    Backbone.js is minimal and lightweight, which means it has a small footprint and adds very little overhead to your project.
  • Flexibility
    Backbone.js provides a flexible structure to developers by allowing them to build their own MVC or MVP architectures using models, views, collections, and routers.
  • Ease of Integration
    Backbone.js can be easily integrated with other libraries and frameworks, such as jQuery or underscore.js, enhancing its capabilities without much difficulty.
  • Large Community
    Backbone.js has been around for a long time, resulting in a large community and a plethora of plugins and extensions that can be leveraged.
  • Detailed Documentation
    The official site offers comprehensive documentation which includes tutorials, examples, and a detailed API reference, aiding developers to understand and utilize the library efficiently.

Possible disadvantages of Backbone.js

  • Steeper Learning Curve
    New developers might find Backbone.js difficult to learn due to its non-opinionated nature and lack of enforced structure.
  • Sparse In-Built Features
    Backbone.js provides only the basic building blocks, requiring developers to write more boilerplate code or rely on external libraries for additional functionalities.
  • Outdated
    As newer frameworks and libraries (like React, Vue, and Angular) have emerged with more robust features and better performance, Backbone.js has somewhat fallen out of favor in modern development practices.
  • Event Binding Complexity
    Managing event bindings in Backbone.js can become complex and sometimes messy in large applications, which can lead to difficult maintenance and debugging.
  • Limited Two-Way Data Binding
    Backbone.js does not provide two-way data binding out-of-the-box, unlike other frameworks such as Angular, necessitating additional code to sync views and models.

Sandpack by CodeSandbox features and specs

  • Real-time Collaboration
    Sandpack allows developers to collaborate in real-time, enabling teams to work together efficiently without dealing with latency or desynchronization issues.
  • Easy to Embed
    Sandpack makes it easy to embed live code examples in documentation, blog posts, or tutorials, enhancing the learning and sharing experience.
  • Customizable Environment
    Developers can customize their development environment to suit their specific needs by choosing different bundlers, editors, and themes.
  • Integration with CodeSandbox
    Sandpack seamlessly integrates with CodeSandbox, allowing users to switch between simplified live previews and full-featured development environments.
  • Open Source
    Being open source, Sandpack encourages community contributions, ensuring continuous improvement and support from a broader group of developers.

Possible disadvantages of Sandpack by CodeSandbox

  • Limited Language Support
    Sandpack might support fewer programming languages compared to other development platforms, potentially limiting its usability for some projects.
  • Performance Constraints
    The performance of Sandpack might be constrained by browser limitations, affecting the speed and responsiveness of larger projects or complex applications.
  • Learning Curve
    New users may face a learning curve when adapting to Sandpack's environment and features, especially if they are used to other development tools.
  • Dependency on Internet Connection
    As a web-based tool, Sandpack requires a stable internet connection for optimal performance, which could be a drawback in areas with unreliable connectivity.

Backbone.js videos

Introduction to Backbone.js

More videos:

  • Review - Introduction to Backbone.js
  • Review - Backbone.js Code Review w Backbone.js Mentor Jonathon

Sandpack by CodeSandbox videos

No Sandpack by CodeSandbox videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Backbone.js and Sandpack by CodeSandbox)
JavaScript Framework
100 100%
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Javascript UI Libraries
100 100%
0% 0
Open Source
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Backbone.js and Sandpack by CodeSandbox. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Backbone.js and Sandpack by CodeSandbox

Backbone.js Reviews

20 Next.js Alternatives Worth Considering
A veteran on the scene, Backbone.js is all about giving structure to your JavaScript-heavy applications. It’s standing the test of time, enabling you to keep your data logic and display logic neatly side by side, all while being lightweight.
9 Best JavaScript Frameworks to Use in 2023
Backbone.js is based on the Model View Controller (MVC) design pattern. The library supports seven components: Models, Views, Collections, Routers, Events, Sync, and Options. Backbone.js also provides an asynchronous communication layer that allows the application to communicate with a backend service.
Source: ninetailed.io
JavaScript: What Are The Most Used Frameworks For This Language?
Backbone.JS is a lightweight JavaScript library that provides a framework for developing structured and scalable web applications. It offers a set of tools for building client-side applications that interact with RESTful APIs. Backbone.JS is well-suited for developing single-page applications (SPAs) where most of the user interface is rendered in the browser, rather than...
Source: www.bocasay.com
20 Best JavaScript Frameworks For 2023
Backbone.js is a JavaScript-based framework that connects to an API via a RESTful JSON interface. Backbone.js is known for being small and light because it only requires jQuery and one JavaScript library, Underscore.js, to use the entire library.
Top JavaScript Frameworks For Mobile App Development
Backbone JS is a JavaScript framework based on the MVP app design. As the name suggests, it acts as a strong backbone to your project. It is lightweight in nature and hence, is considered ideal for developing single-page applications. It offers a simplistic frontend and makes the best use of JavaScript functions.
Source: medium.com

Sandpack by CodeSandbox Reviews

We have no reviews of Sandpack by CodeSandbox yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Backbone.js should be more popular than Sandpack by CodeSandbox. It has been mentiond 17 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Backbone.js mentions (17)

  • JavaScript Views, the Hard Way – A Pattern for Writing UI
    Https://backbonejs.org/#View There is also a github repo that has examples of MVC patterns adapted to the web platform. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago
  • JavaScript evolution: From Lodash and Underscore to vanilla
    Underscore was created by Jeremy Ashkenas (the creator of Backbone.js) in 2009 to provide a set of utility functions that JavaScript lacked at the time. It was also created to work with Backbone.js, but it slowly became a favorite among developers who needed utility functions that they could just call and get stuff done with without having to worry about the inner implementations and browser compatibility. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • React is 10 years old
    Got it thanks for the context. I've read the web app and it seems to me it is just https://backbonejs.org/ re-written in Typescript and allows JSX. I'm very certain Typescript and JSX will have improved the DX for Backbone like apps, but it doesn't address all of the other issues that teams had with Backbone. e.g. Cyclical event propagation, state stored in the DOM (i.e. Appendchild is error prone in large code... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
  • Just Simply – Stop saying how simple things are in our docs
    Even further nowadays, docs are created using Docusaurus. I don't have problem with it but documentation should be good (eye) friendly than easy to write. Why not be creative while writing docs such as - Backbone.js - https://backbonejs.org Or https://backbonejs.org/docs/backbone.html as code annotation. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
  • The Emperor's New Library
    What we see, a decade ago, are that many of the "popular" libraries, frameworks, and methods, not surprisingly, have gone by the wayside, a lot that have remained in current code as difficult-to-removemodernize legacy cruft (Bower, Gulp, Grunt, Backbone, Angular 1, ...), and then we have the small minority that are still here. Some that remain have had their utility lessened/questioned by platform and language... - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
View more

Sandpack by CodeSandbox mentions (8)

  • Inside the Box: August Community Update
    Sandpack static file support 🖼️ — You can now serve static files inside a Sandpack instance! This beta feature allows serving SVGs, fonts, images, and much more, which helps take isolated, interactive code examples to a new level! - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
  • This weird IFRAME thing wasted my 2 days (and counting...)
    But as soon as I wrote the first iteration, I got to know that it wasn't a cakewalk. The page I was trying to capture screenshot of did not render the preview as soon as it loaded. I am using Sandpack by codesandbox to render react/nextjs components and it takes around 35-40 seconds to load up the preview(it runs every thing on machine[WASM baby], such a 😎 cool tech). - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
  • Celebrating Hacktoberfest With Tips for Open-Source
    For us at CodeSandbox, we stand by it as a company but also as individuals. We released our browser editor, Sandpack, and parts of Nodebox as open source and we want to give back any time we can! - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • I spent 5 months building a free leetcode for React/Frontend 🎉
    As for the portal itself then I was thinking of making another post that explains how the site is built. But sandpack by codebox is the standard solution for live code execution. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Creating fluffy trees with Three.js
    Https://sandpack.codesandbox.io/ Sandpack is what they're using. Go check out the docs, and I'm sure there's plenty of tutorials if you search it up. Source: over 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Backbone.js and Sandpack by CodeSandbox, you can also consider the following products

AngularJS - AngularJS lets you extend HTML vocabulary for your application. The resulting environment is extraordinarily expressive, readable, and quick to develop.

replit - Code, create, andlearn together. Use our free, collaborative, in-browser IDE to code in 50+ languages — without spending a second on setup.

ExpressJS - Sinatra inspired web development framework for node.js -- insanely fast, flexible, and simple

Runops - Run one-off scripts as production-ready automations

ember.js - A JavaScript framework for creating ambitious web apps

CodeSandbox - Online playground for React