Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

ember.js VS Sandpack by CodeSandbox

Compare ember.js VS Sandpack by CodeSandbox and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

ember.js logo ember.js

A JavaScript framework for creating ambitious web apps

Sandpack by CodeSandbox logo Sandpack by CodeSandbox

Sandpack is a toolkit for building live coding experiences that run fully in the browser.
  • ember.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-04-15
  • Sandpack by CodeSandbox Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-03

ember.js features and specs

  • Convention Over Configuration
    Ember.js emphasizes conventions, which can help streamline the development process and reduce decision fatigue by providing out-of-the-box solutions and standardizing code structure.
  • Robust CLI
    Ember CLI is a powerful command-line tool that helps automate numerous development tasks, such as scaffolding, building, testing, and deploying applications, making the developer's workflow more efficient.
  • EMBER Data
    Ember Data is a robust library for handling data models and relationships. It simplifies the process of interacting with APIs and managing data, offering built-in support for RESTful APIs.
  • Strong Community and Ecosystem
    Ember.js has a strong and active community, which results in extensive documentation, numerous addons, and regular updates, enhancing the framework's reliability and feature set.
  • Two-Way Data Binding
    Ember.js supports two-way data binding, which helps keep the model and the view in sync automatically. This feature simplifies the management of user input and model updates.
  • Built-in Testing
    Ember.js has built-in testing support, making it easier to write and run tests for applications. This facilitates the development of robust, maintainable, and bug-free code.
  • Focused on Large Applications
    Ember.js is particularly well-suited for ambitious, large-scale applications due to its structure and built-in best practices, which promote maintainability and scalability.

Possible disadvantages of ember.js

  • Steep Learning Curve
    Ember.js has a significant learning curve, particularly for developers who are new to its conventions and deep abstractions. This can be a barrier to entry for some.
  • Performance Overhead
    The comprehensive nature of Ember.js can lead to performance overhead, especially for smaller applications. The framework's rich feature set may be more than what is needed for simpler projects.
  • Less Flexibility
    The convention-over-configuration approach can reduce flexibility and make it harder to deviate from the prescribed way of doing things, which can be restrictive for developers who need more control.
  • Heavy Dependencies
    Ember.js applications can come with numerous dependencies, which can increase the bundle size and, subsequently, the load time of the application.
  • Slow to Adapt New Trends
    Being a mature framework, Ember.js can be slower to adopt the latest web development trends compared to newer frameworks, leading to potential lag in leveraging cutting-edge features.
  • Complexity in Customization
    While conventions can be beneficial, scenarios that require custom configurations can become complex and cumbersome, potentially complicating the development process.
  • Smaller Talent Pool
    Compared to more mainstream frameworks like React or Angular, there is a smaller pool of developers who are proficient in Ember.js, which can make hiring and collaboration more challenging.

Sandpack by CodeSandbox features and specs

  • Real-time Collaboration
    Sandpack allows developers to collaborate in real-time, enabling teams to work together efficiently without dealing with latency or desynchronization issues.
  • Easy to Embed
    Sandpack makes it easy to embed live code examples in documentation, blog posts, or tutorials, enhancing the learning and sharing experience.
  • Customizable Environment
    Developers can customize their development environment to suit their specific needs by choosing different bundlers, editors, and themes.
  • Integration with CodeSandbox
    Sandpack seamlessly integrates with CodeSandbox, allowing users to switch between simplified live previews and full-featured development environments.
  • Open Source
    Being open source, Sandpack encourages community contributions, ensuring continuous improvement and support from a broader group of developers.

Possible disadvantages of Sandpack by CodeSandbox

  • Limited Language Support
    Sandpack might support fewer programming languages compared to other development platforms, potentially limiting its usability for some projects.
  • Performance Constraints
    The performance of Sandpack might be constrained by browser limitations, affecting the speed and responsiveness of larger projects or complex applications.
  • Learning Curve
    New users may face a learning curve when adapting to Sandpack's environment and features, especially if they are used to other development tools.
  • Dependency on Internet Connection
    As a web-based tool, Sandpack requires a stable internet connection for optimal performance, which could be a drawback in areas with unreliable connectivity.

ember.js videos

What is Ember.js?

More videos:

  • Review - A preview of Ember.js Octane

Sandpack by CodeSandbox videos

No Sandpack by CodeSandbox videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to ember.js and Sandpack by CodeSandbox)
Javascript UI Libraries
100 100%
0% 0
Developer Tools
76 76%
24% 24
JavaScript Framework
100 100%
0% 0
Open Source
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using ember.js and Sandpack by CodeSandbox. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare ember.js and Sandpack by CodeSandbox

ember.js Reviews

Top JavaScript Frameworks in 2025
Ember.JS is an open-source, JavaScript client-side framework that is useful for developing web applications. It provides a complete solution containing data management and application flow to develop an application, making it one of the reasons developers prefer to use it. Ember.JS also uses an MVVM architecture pattern along with a command-line interface tool that helps in...
Source: solguruz.com
20 Next.js Alternatives Worth Considering
Ember.js is old school cool, a framework that’s been whispering sweet nothings to devs for years, helping build ambitious web applications. It wraps its arms around conventions and provides everything you need to build rich, complex web UIs.
The 20 Best Laravel Alternatives for Web Development
Ember.js — the ambitious framework that promises a developer heaven, paving your road to productivity with a convention-over-configuration dogma and a solidly structured path.
9 Best JavaScript Frameworks to Use in 2023
Ember.js: Ember.js provides a lot of built-in features and conventions, making it easy to get started and build complex applications. It has a strong focus on developer productivity.
Source: ninetailed.io
JavaScript: What Are The Most Used Frameworks For This Language?
In addition, it offers a powerful command-line interface (CLI) that can generate boilerplate code and automate common tasks, making it easier to get started and build applications quickly. With a strong focus on performance, Ember.JS provides features like fast initial page loads, incremental rendering and advanced caching mechanisms.
Source: www.bocasay.com

Sandpack by CodeSandbox Reviews

We have no reviews of Sandpack by CodeSandbox yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, ember.js should be more popular than Sandpack by CodeSandbox. It has been mentiond 33 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

ember.js mentions (33)

  • Thinking in Templates
    Django, for example, has a template engine that allows you to define a template in HTML and render it with a context -- data usually sourced from the database via the Django view. However, with its filters and helpers, it is almost too powerful -- undermining the core idea of templating. The same goes for Ember.js, as well. - Source: dev.to / 3 days ago
  • Embroider & Vite & net::ERR_ABORTED 504 (Outdated Optimize Dep)
    While working on EmberJS projects, I've been using pre-alpha version of @embroider/app-blueprint quite a lot lately and I hit a baffling error:. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • ResponsiveImage & EmberJS & glob vite imports
    I had a need to dynamically load a folder images in my EmberJS app that is using embroider-build/app-blueprint and ResponsiveImage. Turns out I could use vite glob imports and resulting code looked something like:. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • Installing EmberJS v2 addons from GitHub forks using PNPM
    If you're using PNPM as a package manager for your EmberJS project and you find yourself in a need to install a v2 addon from git(hub) fork (because you have a branch with patched version), then you might find that GitHub URLs in package.json tricks don't work for you. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
  • Add custom layer to embe-leaflet
    Ember-leaflet is a very popular addon from EmberJS ecosystem that allows a lot of flexibility. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
View more

Sandpack by CodeSandbox mentions (8)

  • Inside the Box: August Community Update
    Sandpack static file support 🖼️ — You can now serve static files inside a Sandpack instance! This beta feature allows serving SVGs, fonts, images, and much more, which helps take isolated, interactive code examples to a new level! - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
  • This weird IFRAME thing wasted my 2 days (and counting...)
    But as soon as I wrote the first iteration, I got to know that it wasn't a cakewalk. The page I was trying to capture screenshot of did not render the preview as soon as it loaded. I am using Sandpack by codesandbox to render react/nextjs components and it takes around 35-40 seconds to load up the preview(it runs every thing on machine[WASM baby], such a 😎 cool tech). - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
  • Celebrating Hacktoberfest With Tips for Open-Source
    For us at CodeSandbox, we stand by it as a company but also as individuals. We released our browser editor, Sandpack, and parts of Nodebox as open source and we want to give back any time we can! - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • I spent 5 months building a free leetcode for React/Frontend 🎉
    As for the portal itself then I was thinking of making another post that explains how the site is built. But sandpack by codebox is the standard solution for live code execution. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Creating fluffy trees with Three.js
    Https://sandpack.codesandbox.io/ Sandpack is what they're using. Go check out the docs, and I'm sure there's plenty of tutorials if you search it up. Source: over 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing ember.js and Sandpack by CodeSandbox, you can also consider the following products

AngularJS - AngularJS lets you extend HTML vocabulary for your application. The resulting environment is extraordinarily expressive, readable, and quick to develop.

replit - Code, create, andlearn together. Use our free, collaborative, in-browser IDE to code in 50+ languages — without spending a second on setup.

Vue.js - Reactive Components for Modern Web Interfaces

Runops - Run one-off scripts as production-ready automations

Backbone.js - Give your JS App some Backbone with Models, Views, Collections, and Events

CodeSandbox - Online playground for React