Table of contents
Increased Efficiency
TextExpander allows users to create and use shortcuts for frequently used text, significantly reducing the time spent on repetitive typing tasks.
Consistency
By using pre-defined snippets, TextExpander ensures that commonly used phrases and responses are consistent across different documents and communications.
Customization
Users can customize their snippets with variables, macros, and even scripting, providing flexibility to meet diverse needs.
Cross-Platform Support
TextExpander supports multiple platforms, including Windows, macOS, iOS, and ChromeOS, allowing users to maintain productivity across different devices.
TextExpander is generally considered good, especially for users who frequently find themselves typing repetitive text. It can significantly improve productivity for those who require consistency and speed in their written communications.
We have collected here some useful links to help you find out if TextExpander is good.
Check the traffic stats of TextExpander on SimilarWeb. The key metrics to look for are: monthly visits, average visit duration, pages per visit, and traffic by country. Moreoever, check the traffic sources. For example "Direct" traffic is a good sign.
Check the "Domain Rating" of TextExpander on Ahrefs. The domain rating is a measure of the strength of a website's backlink profile on a scale from 0 to 100. It shows the strength of TextExpander's backlink profile compared to the other websites. In most cases a domain rating of 60+ is considered good and 70+ is considered very good.
Check the "Domain Authority" of TextExpander on MOZ. A website's domain authority (DA) is a search engine ranking score that predicts how well a website will rank on search engine result pages (SERPs). It is based on a 100-point logarithmic scale, with higher scores corresponding to a greater likelihood of ranking. This is another useful metric to check if a website is good.
The latest comments about TextExpander on Reddit. This can help you find out how popualr the product is and what people think about it.
If you are already using Alfred[1] (with PowerPack), then snippets are your friend. Combine this with macOS's own Text Replacement[2], can cover most needs. You add up your snippets as you go along and sync/backup it so you won't have to re-do on each install/upgrade. I also found out that it is easier to use "," as a deliminator as there is no way I will type a normal English word with a comma then a character... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
First, I have to make a personal confession — I never liked the SMS short-hand thingy that worked with pre-iPhone phones. That was one of the reason I use SMS/Text-Messages unless I really need to. I have been using text-expansion since the early days of TextExpander[1], an app that works on iOS and macOS. However good the iPhone keyboard was, it was always not convenient to type and retype details such as home... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
There is an app called TextExpander that you can use to store frequently used text selections and then type a shortcut to have it automatically insert into any Microsoft document. It is extremely helpful for busting through routine motions or correspondence. For example, if I want my atty’s signature block, I have it set up to insert when I type /sigblock. I have whole letters and pleadings saved in there and I... Source: almost 3 years ago
TextExpander: The reference, but is also subscription based. Source: about 3 years ago
To help me save time and avoid distractions, I’ve been using prompts through the TextExpander app. These prompts are shortcuts that I’ve created to quickly add little instructions I feel I have to repeat often. For example, I’ve created a prompt to “stamp all code snippets you produce with a unique identifier,” which has made it much easier to ask GPT3 to go back and retrieve the code I’m referencing. Source: about 3 years ago
I cannot recommend TextExpander enough. You can create a library of comments with shortcuts so instead of even having to CTRL C CTRL V it, you can just type something like ;comment1 and poof, it’s there. I have hundreds of TextExpander shortcuts not just for grading, but for just those random phrases we have to type over and over and over in emails, instructions, announcements, etc. It’s $4.99 a month and it... Source: over 3 years ago
By automating repetitive tasks, I have enhanced my productivity and saved time. I automate tasks like text expansion, task management, and code snippets using programs like Alfred, TextExpander, or IFTTT. - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago
Just typing text expamder.in.google.and.its.the ffist.link Https://textexpander.com/ Its breally a handy tool if you are always typing in the same long phrase at work or whatever. Https://youtu.be/HmuBmAtR9xc. Source: over 3 years ago
You might also want to check out aText, TypeIt4Me, Rocket Typist, TextExpander for this kind of thing. Source: over 3 years ago
TextExpander: it’s been the reference for a while. Solid feature set and nice UI, but I find the expansion speed lackluster (I use hundreds of snippets for long transcriptions and need it to be quick - speed doesn’t really matter if you only need expansion infrequently. Another negative for many people is that TextExpanders requires a subscription. Source: over 3 years ago
I personally just switched from TextExpander to to Typinator for text expansion and both are excellent. TextExpander feels more polished but Typinator has a few power features that TextExpander, and other alternatives I looked at, don’t. Source: over 3 years ago
Once you've done that for a month or 2 use textexpander.com and create snippets for all the things you repeatedly write. Source: over 3 years ago
Https://textexpander.com/ - If you write a lot, or even a little and find yourself repeating things then this is for you. You can create snippets for email signatures or even entire emails if you like. e.g. You could type if I type ;em it replaces it with my email address. Source: over 3 years ago
I did find textexpander.com but that appears to allow you to enter a shortcode and then it will add in the predetermined text. What I would really like is an app that sees what I am typing and if the beginning of a sentence is similar to a custom response that I have pre-programmed in its database, it will ask me if I want the custom response pasted into the app that I am writing in. Source: over 3 years ago
I'm not sure that any tech layering will ever totally take away this problem — you might also want to have a look at Text Expander, so that when you are asked the same questions, you can easily respond with the answer. Source: over 3 years ago
Heh. Essentially, yes. I use TextExpander a lot for things like this.. Source: over 3 years ago
For text snippets and expansion like I think you’re talking about, I’ve been using TextExpander for years. You can keep the snippet window open if you want and there is TONS of customization available for all sorts of configurations. I think there are some workflows available for TextExpander in Alfred at http://www.packal.org as well. Hope this helps! Source: over 3 years ago
TextExpander (subscription; $40/yr). Source: almost 4 years ago
TextExpander (Mac, Windows, iOS) - Store all the things you type repetitively, and call them up with a few keystrokes. I send a lot of emails, and this one is huge. It also lets you customize to make things sound more personal. Source: about 4 years ago
Just adding to this because it works so well with weird assortments of modifiers - TextExpander is a great little app where you can launch snippets of text and code (JavaScript, AppleScript, Shell Script) using programmed keys. Same concept as remapping keys to do a thing, just with a bit more flexibility. Source: over 4 years ago
One thing that's helped a lot is TextExpander. Instead of switching to Zoom, finding my personal meeting room, switching back to wherever I want to type, and pasting it in, I just type myzoom and it pops in there. Source: over 4 years ago
TextExpander has long been recognized as a pioneering tool in the realm of text automation, frequently topping the lists of recommended text expander apps for macOS. Its reputation is built on the robust feature set that allows users to create snippets of frequently used text, ranging from email templates to coding snippets, which can be inserted with simple keyboard shortcuts. The platform supports customization, offering dynamic variables and integration with various operating systems, including macOS, Windows, and iOS. Despite its comprehensive capabilities, public sentiment regarding TextExpander has been notably polarized due to its pricing strategy.
The most significant public discussion point about TextExpander centers around its transition to a subscription model, billed at $40 annually. This shift has not been well-received by all of its user base. Many users, who were satisfied with the one-time purchase model, found alternatives due to the increased cost of a subscription. The new pricing structure, while providing continuous updates and support, has led some users to question the value proposition, especially when compared to competitors offering similar functionalities at a lower or one-time cost. The market response indicates a preference for cost-effective solutions, with aText often highlighted as a compelling alternative due to its straightforward, perpetual $5 pricing.
Competitors such as PhraseExpress, Typinator, and espanso are noted in discussions for providing comparable features without the need for a subscription. Users frequently mention these alternatives in forums and reviews, highlighting features that are often adequate for their needs without additional financial commitment. Typinator, for example, has been specifically mentioned for its power features and a polished interface similar to TextExpander.
Despite the pricing concerns, TextExpander still holds a strong position due to its extensive feature set and integrations. It is applauded for enhancing productivity by automating repetitive tasks, with use cases spanning from personal correspondence to professional documentation. Its UI and ease of creating and managing text snippets remain key strengths, appealing to users who leverage the tool’s advanced functions for more than basic text expansion.
In conclusion, while TextExpander continues to be regarded as a reliable and feature-rich tool in the text automation sphere, its ongoing relevance in the competitive landscape hinges on its pricing model relative to its value. The tool garners appreciation for its functionality but faces challenges due to cost concerns, driving some users towards free or cheaper alternatives that satisfy the essential requirements of text expansion effectively. As such, prospective users must weigh the necessity of TextExpander’s advanced features against the cost and explore whether simpler or cost-effective tools might suffice for their text automation needs.
Do you know an article comparing TextExpander to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
Is TextExpander good? This is an informative page that will help you find out. Moreover, you can review and discuss TextExpander here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.
