Table of contents
User-Friendly Interface
Kitemaker offers a clean and intuitive user interface that makes it easy for teams to navigate and manage tasks without a steep learning curve.
Collaborative Features
Built with real-time collaboration in mind, Kitemaker allows team members to work together seamlessly, providing features for discussion and integration with other tools to facilitate teamwork.
Flexibility
Kitemaker is designed to adapt to various workflows, supporting different project management methodologies such as Agile, Scrum, and Kanban.
Integration Capabilities
The platform offers integration with popular tools like GitHub, Slack, and others, allowing teams to maintain a cohesive workflow across different software.
Speed
Kitemaker is optimized for fast performance, ensuring that users can navigate and manage their tasks without unnecessary delays.
We have collected here some useful links to help you find out if Kitemaker is good.
Check the traffic stats of Kitemaker on SimilarWeb. The key metrics to look for are: monthly visits, average visit duration, pages per visit, and traffic by country. Moreoever, check the traffic sources. For example "Direct" traffic is a good sign.
Check the "Domain Rating" of Kitemaker on Ahrefs. The domain rating is a measure of the strength of a website's backlink profile on a scale from 0 to 100. It shows the strength of Kitemaker's backlink profile compared to the other websites. In most cases a domain rating of 60+ is considered good and 70+ is considered very good.
Check the "Domain Authority" of Kitemaker on MOZ. A website's domain authority (DA) is a search engine ranking score that predicts how well a website will rank on search engine result pages (SERPs). It is based on a 100-point logarithmic scale, with higher scores corresponding to a greater likelihood of ranking. This is another useful metric to check if a website is good.
The latest comments about Kitemaker on Reddit. This can help you find out how popualr the product is and what people think about it.
When we built Kitemaker [0] we elected to not use CRDTs. We built our sync engine after reading the blog article Figma wrote about they didn't need CRDTs because they have the server arbitrating any conflicts. We ended up taking the same approach. It's worked out very well for us though in a tool like our "last one in wins" generally works fine and doesn't lead to a lot of surprises. For documents, we had to do... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
There is no one-size-fits-all approach to writing descriptions, so you need to figure out what works best for you and your team. However, seeing real-world examples might inspire you to find new ways to write them. Here are some examples from descriptions we have written for Kitemaker. - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago
Kitemaker.co - Collaborate through all phases of the product development process and keep track of work across Slack, Discord, Figma, and Github. Unlimited users, unlimited spaces. Free plan up to 250 work items. - Source: dev.to / almost 4 years ago
At Kitemaker, we recently made the leap to Recoil.js for our React state management needs. Before using Recoil, Kitemaker used a simple state management solution built upon useReducer(). We built Kitemaker to be super fast, responding to every user interaction instantly. However, in organizations with lots of data, we sometimes had a difficult time achieving this due to unnecessary re-renders. Kitemaker has a sync... - Source: dev.to / almost 4 years ago
Definitely feel your pain. We did a full OT implementation for our startup [0] and it was a beast. We based it on Slate.js which has a nice concept of operations that maps nicely to OT, but it was still a lot of work to get it working well (and there are still rough edges we try to improve all of the time). We did base it on Postgres in the backend so really looking forward to what the Supabase team comes up with... - Source: Hacker News / almost 4 years ago
4) Have a way to keep references to all the discussions in one place and visible to the entire team. [0] https://kitemaker.co/. - Source: Hacker News / about 4 years ago
I'm going to shill for my current employer, you should checkout Kitemaker[0]. The unique shtick is that our 'issues' are large collaborative documents (we call them work items) and are meant to track deliverables rather than development tasks. The idea is that a work item is created as soon as someone has an idea and all the exploratory work happens in the work item. So it could start with someone writing down how... - Source: Hacker News / about 4 years ago
Supabase recently announced something in the "realtime" space https://supabase.com/blog/2022/04/01/supabase-realtime-with-multiplayer-features Like to keep up-to-date on this stuff because we ended up building the realtime/multiplayer part of Kitemaker [0] from scratch on top of GraphQL so I'm always curious what's coming along to make things easier. 0: https://kitemaker.co. - Source: Hacker News / over 4 years ago
Try Kitemaker, itโs a YComb backed JIRA alternative. https://kitemaker.co/. - Source: Hacker News / over 4 years ago
This is cool! It's kind of similar to what the RICE/ICE frameworks are trying to help achieve [0]. We built some scoring of impact/effort into our tool Kitemaker [1] and allow teams to prioritize their work by these things. We ended up going with really simple scores like S/M/L since it's super hard to know the difference between a 6 and a 7 (and it probably doesn't really matter anyway). 0:... - Source: Hacker News / over 4 years ago
We looked at Linear and decided on Kitemaker[0] as their core thesis is enabling collaboration with eng and product (and other stakeholders). The team does daily deployments and like Linear they focus on speed and hotkeys. [0] https://kitemaker.co. - Source: Hacker News / over 4 years ago
- Memoization of leaf nodes doesn't work properly so you get a lot of unnecessary re-rendering (at least in the version we're using) 0: https://kitemaker.co. - Source: Hacker News / almost 5 years ago
Kitemaker.co - Collaborate through all phases of the product development process and keep track of work across Slack, Discord, Figma, and Github. Unlimited users, unlimited spaces. Free plan up to 250 work items. - Source: dev.to / about 5 years ago
Do you know an article comparing Kitemaker to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
Is Kitemaker good? This is an informative page that will help you find out. Moreover, you can review and discuss Kitemaker here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.
