Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

XWiki VS ReadMe

Compare XWiki VS ReadMe and see what are their differences

XWiki logo XWiki

A powerful Open Source collaborative platform enhancing collaboration and communication.

ReadMe logo ReadMe

A collaborative developer hub for your API or code.
  • XWiki Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-01-21
  • ReadMe Landing page
    Landing page //
    2025-03-04

XWiki features and specs

  • Open Source
    XWiki is an open-source platform, which means it is free to use and has a community of developers continuously improving it.
  • Extensibility
    The platform is highly extensible with a wide range of plugins and macros, making it customizable based on user needs.
  • Collaboration Features
    Supports collaborative editing, real-time notifications, and workflow management, enhancing team productivity.
  • Flexible Permissions
    Provides detailed permission management, allowing administrators to control access at various levels (page, space).
  • Structured Data Management
    Allows users to create applications within the wiki to manage structured data efficiently.
  • Version Control
    Includes versioning capabilities, enabling users to track changes and revert to previous versions when necessary.
  • Multilingual Support
    Offers support for multiple languages, making it suitable for global teams.
  • Integration
    Capable of integrating with various third-party applications and services, like LDAP, Active Directory, and more.

Possible disadvantages of XWiki

  • Complex Setup
    Initial installation and configuration can be complex and time-consuming, especially for non-technical users.
  • Learning Curve
    Due to its extensive features and capabilities, new users might face a steep learning curve.
  • Resource Intensive
    Can be resource-intensive, requiring significant server resources to run efficiently, particularly for large installations.
  • Limited Hosting Options
    While there is a cloud offering (XWiki Cloud), users may find fewer hosting options compared to other popular wiki solutions.
  • User Interface
    The user interface, while functional, may not be as modern or intuitive as some newer wiki platforms.
  • Community Support
    While there is a community support system, it might not be as robust as commercial support options available with other platforms.
  • Documentation Quality
    Some users may find the official documentation lacking in certain areas, making troubleshooting harder.
  • Upgrades and Maintenance
    Regular upgrades and maintenance can be necessary to keep the system secure and up-to-date, which may be cumbersome for small teams without dedicated IT staff.

ReadMe features and specs

  • User-friendly Interface
    ReadMe offers a clean, intuitive interface that makes it easy for users to create and manage documentation without requiring extensive technical skills.
  • Interactive API Documentation
    The platform provides interactive API documentation, allowing users to try out API calls directly within the documentation, which enhances user understanding and engagement.
  • Customizability
    ReadMe allows a high level of customization, enabling users to tailor the look and feel of their documentation to match their brand identity.
  • Analytics
    The service offers built-in analytics, providing insights into how users interact with the documentation, which can help in improving user experience and understanding common issues.
  • Version Control
    ReadMe supports version control, making it easy to manage and maintain documentation for different versions of an API or product.
  • Collaboration Tools
    It includes collaboration tools that facilitate teamwork by allowing multiple users to work on documentation simultaneously.
  • Markdown Support
    The platform supports Markdown, making it easy for users to format their documentation efficiently.

Possible disadvantages of ReadMe

  • Cost
    Compared to some other documentation platforms, ReadMe can be more expensive, especially for small startups or individual developers.
  • Learning Curve
    While user-friendly, some advanced features may have a learning curve, especially for those who are not familiar with documentation tools.
  • Limited Offline Access
    ReadMe primarily operates as an online service, which can be limiting for users who need offline access to their documentation.
  • Performance on Large Projects
    There may be performance issues or slowdowns when dealing with very large projects or extensive documentation, requiring optimization.
  • Feature Limitations in Lower Tiers
    Some advanced features and customizability options are restricted to higher pricing tiers, which may not be accessible to all users.

XWiki videos

XWiki: a case study on managing corporate and community interests 14 years of Open Source in a Smal…

More videos:

  • Review - XWiki, a free, open source, self hosted Wiki that has all the features of Confluence at minimal cost
  • Review - From 0 to Intranet in 20 minutes with XWiki - Anca Luca

ReadMe videos

No ReadMe videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to XWiki and ReadMe)
WiKis
100 100%
0% 0
Documentation
0 0%
100% 100
Note Taking
100 100%
0% 0
Documentation As A Service & Tools

User comments

Share your experience with using XWiki and ReadMe. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare XWiki and ReadMe

XWiki Reviews

Top 12 Self-hosted Wiki Engines for 2024: A Comprehensive Guide
Developed in Java and licensed under LGPL, XWiki serves as a versatile platform for creating collaborative applications using the wiki paradigm. However, it is worth noting that its intricacy and the requirement for Java proficiency may pose certain challenges for less technically inclined users.
Source: medevel.com
The 10 Best Self-hosted Wiki Software for Linux System
XWiki is a mindblowing open source wiki software. It is a Java-based enterprise wiki software. It has many professional features such as File Management, Blog, Comments & Notes, and many more. There are many templates and more than 600 plugins available for XWiki. It also has a WYSIWYG editor similar to BookStack.
Best 11 Open-source Free Wiki Engines for teams and enterprise in 2022
XWiki is an open-source wiki engine for enterprise. It focuses on productivity, collaboration, and simplicity.
Source: medevel.com
The Best 20 Wiki Software For Your Business& Internal Knowledge for 2022
XWiki is an advanced open-source wiki software used by small organizations as well as large firms to create first-generation and second-generation wikis. While the first generation wikis are majorly for content collaboration, the latter are for blogs, forums, and task management. With over 600 extensions, themes, and macros, XWiki helps you succeed in creating wonderful wikis.
17 open source wiki engine/software
Xwiki is a fully-featured open Source Wiki engine and Content-Oriented Application Platform for the Enterprise. It’s also a second generation wiki software offering the ability to install and develop small applications inside wiki pages and it also offer both a generic platform for developing collaborative applications using the wiki paradigm and products developed on top of...

ReadMe Reviews

Best Gitbook Alternatives You Need to Try in 2023
Readme.com is a developer hub that allows users to publish API documentation. It focuses on making API references interactive by allowing to Try out API calls, log metrics about the API call usage, and more. This means it lacks some capabilities, like a review system and several blocks, which the Gitbook editor supports.
Source: www.archbee.com
12 Most Useful Knowledge Management Tools for Your Business
ReadMe offers integration with apps like Slack, Google Analytics, and Zendesk. One of its most significant advantages is the metrics option which lets you see how customers are using your API.
Source: www.archbee.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, ReadMe seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 23 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

XWiki mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of XWiki yet. Tracking of XWiki recommendations started around Mar 2021.

ReadMe mentions (23)

  • 7 Top API Documentation Software Tools 2025 (With Reviews and Pricing)✨
    For more information and to subscribe, visit ReadMe. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • Leveraging API Documentation for Faster Developer Onboarding
    Documentation portals like ReadMe provide complete Developer experience platforms with customization, analytics, and feedback mechanisms. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • Integrating OpenAPI With Mintlify
    According to the OpenAPI specification initiative, OpenAPI is the standard for defining your API. This means that with the help of this file, you can migrate your API documentation from one platform to another. For example, you can migrate your API docs from Postman to ReadMe or Mintlify or vice versa. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • How to view API request examples in a ReadMe documentation.
    My recent experience with The Movie Database (TMDB) API documentation underscores the importance of request examples in API documentation. It took me a couple of hours to figure out how to make a successful request to an endpoint because I couldn't access a request sample. However, I eventually found it in an unexpected place. ReadMe on the other hand didn't make it easy. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • Do you Know Only Fools Use APIs Doc Platform?
    I came across readme.io some days back, and It's like that fresh outfit you wear to high-end parties—the one with crisp lines, dark colors, and intricate designs that make you stand out. Their documentation platform is sleek, modern, and highly customizable to fit your brand's drip. It's like having a tailor sew a 007 suit (James Bond) to your specs. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing XWiki and ReadMe, you can also consider the following products

DokuWiki - DokuWiki is a simple to use and highly versatile Open Source wiki software that doesn't require a database.

GitBook - Modern Publishing, Simply taking your books from ideas to finished, polished books.

MediaWiki - MediaWiki is a free software wiki package written in PHP, originally for use on Wikipedia.

Docusaurus - Easy to maintain open source documentation websites

Confluence - Confluence is content collaboration software that changes how modern teams work

Archbee.io - Archbee is a developer-focused product docs tool for your team. Build beautiful product documentation sites or internal wikis/knowledge bases to get your team and product knowledge in one place.