Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Windows Communication Foundation VS jQuery UI

Compare Windows Communication Foundation VS jQuery UI and see what are their differences

Flagsmith
Flagsmith lets you manage feature flags and remote config across web, mobile and server side applications. Deliver true Continuous Integration. Get builds out faster. Control who has access to new features. We're Open Source. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Windows Communication Foundation logo Windows Communication Foundation

Other Web Frameworks

jQuery UI logo jQuery UI

Curated set of user interface interactions, effects, widgets, and themes built on top of the jQuery JavaScript Library
  • Windows Communication Foundation Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-09
  • jQuery UI Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-17

Windows Communication Foundation features and specs

  • Interoperability
    WCF is designed to be interoperable with various platforms and services, including those implementing different web service standards, allowing for seamless communication across diverse systems.
  • Extensibility
    WCF provides a highly extensible architecture, enabling developers to customize and extend the framework to meet specific needs and integrate with different existing services.
  • Multiple Transport Protocols
    WCF supports a variety of transport protocols such as HTTP, TCP, MSMQ, and Named Pipes, offering flexibility in how services communicate over networks.
  • Security
    WCF offers comprehensive security features, including message encryption, authentication, and authorization, suitable for secure communication in enterprise environments.
  • Service Oriented Architecture
    WCF is built on a service-oriented architecture (SOA), which promotes loose coupling between components, making systems easier to maintain and scale.

Possible disadvantages of Windows Communication Foundation

  • Complexity
    WCF can be complex to set up and configure, especially for developers who are new to the framework or who need to implement advanced features such as custom behaviors and bindings.
  • Overhead
    WCF may introduce performance overhead due to its extensive features related to reliability, security, and message processing, which can be unnecessary for simpler use cases.
  • Learning Curve
    WCF has a steep learning curve due to its comprehensive features and extensive configuration options, requiring significant time and effort to master.
  • Obsolescence
    WCF is considered deprecated in favor of newer frameworks like gRPC and ASP.NET Core for building modern, scalable web services, reducing its long-term viability for new projects.
  • Limited Future Support
    Microsoft has shifted its focus to other technologies, which may result in limited future enhancements and support for WCF, impacting its suitability for new applications.

jQuery UI features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    jQuery UI simplifies creating and managing complex UI components with straightforward syntax and comprehensive documentation.
  • Compatibility
    jQuery UI is highly compatible with older browsers, offering a broader range of support compared to more modern frameworks.
  • Extensibility
    jQuery UI is designed to be modular and extendable, allowing developers to use only the components they need and easily extend or theming them.
  • Rich Set of Widgets
    It comes with a variety of pre-built widgets such as datepickers, accordions, and sliders, which can save development time.
  • Animated Effects
    jQuery UI includes many built-in animation effects that can enhance the user experience without requiring additional libraries.
  • Theming
    The library provides Themeroller, a tool that allows developers to create custom themes easily, ensuring UI consistency and branding.

Possible disadvantages of jQuery UI

  • Performance
    Due to its extensive feature set, jQuery UI can be relatively heavy, which may affect performance, particularly in resource-constrained environments.
  • Not Mobile-First
    jQuery UI is not designed with mobile-first principles in mind, making it less optimal for modern responsive web applications.
  • Learning Curve
    While easy to use for simple tasks, mastering jQuery UI for more complex applications may require a significant learning curve.
  • Dependency on jQuery
    Since jQuery UI relies on the jQuery library, it adds an additional dependency which can be limiting if you prefer or are required to use vanilla JS or another library.
  • Declining Popularity
    With the rise of modern frameworks like React, Vue, and Angular, jQuery UI has seen a decline in popularity and community support.
  • Limited Modern Features
    Compared to contemporary UI libraries, jQuery UI lacks some of the modern features and performance optimizations found in newer libraries.

Analysis of jQuery UI

Overall verdict

  • jQuery UI is a solid choice for projects that already use jQuery or for developers who need to implement standard UI components quickly and easily. However, for projects starting from scratch, considering more modern alternatives that align with the current state of JavaScript development, such as React, Vue, or Angular, might be beneficial due to their extensive ecosystems and support for modern development patterns.

Why this product is good

  • jQuery UI is a popular library that extends the capabilities of jQuery with a robust set of user interface interactions, effects, widgets, and themes. It is particularly well-suited for developers who are already familiar with jQuery and need to implement features quickly without starting from scratch. Its components are widely used because they are both customizable and reliable, and it is backed by a large community that offers support and contributions. Furthermore, jQuery UI simplifies complex interactions and effects that would otherwise require significant effort to code manually, especially for those who seek cross-browser compatibility.

Recommended for

    jQuery UI is recommended for developers working on legacy projects that heavily rely on jQuery, or for quick, short-to-medium-term projects where ease of use and speed of implementation are paramount. It is also suitable for educational purposes, helping beginners understand DOM manipulation and UI interaction concepts. However, for new projects aimed at creating highly interactive and scalable applications, a framework or library that supports modern front-end technologies may be more appropriate.

Windows Communication Foundation videos

+ Add

Microsoft .NET: Windows Communication Foundation

jQuery UI videos

+ Add

jQuery UI tutorial: Adding a user interface with jQuery UI | lynda.com

More videos:

  • Review - jQuery UI Ultimate:Design Amazing Interfaces Using jQuery UI : Understanding the curriculum.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Windows Communication Foundation and jQuery UI)

Windows Communication Foundation

jQuery UI

Developer Tools
100 100%
Developer Tools
0% 0
Javascript UI Libraries
0 0%
Javascript UI Libraries
100% 100
Ruby Web Framework
100 100%
Ruby Web Framework
0% 0
Development Tools
0 0%
Development Tools
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Windows Communication Foundation and jQuery UI. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Windows Communication Foundation and jQuery UI

Windows Communication Foundation Reviews

SignalR Alternatives
WCF stands for Windows Communication Foundation, which is used to send any message over the network whether from the system, local or remote and then use signalR for displaying it over the browser.
Source: www.educba.com

jQuery UI Reviews

We have no reviews of jQuery UI yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, jQuery UI seems to be a lot more popular than Windows Communication Foundation. While we know about 15 links to jQuery UI, we've tracked only 1 mention of Windows Communication Foundation. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Windows Communication Foundation mentions (1)

jQuery UI mentions (15)

  • Let Me Talk About Component-based Front-end Development
    The once popular jQuery, with its strengths fully utilized in jQuery UI and Bootstrap, provides many UI components and is also friendly to backend developers, seemingly meeting the requirements. However, looking at their component implementation and resource loading forms—. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • 100+ Must-Have Web Development Resources
    jQuery UI: An open-source library for building user interfaces based on jQuery. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
  • What is a component library and should you build your own?
    Fortunately, when I started web development in earnest, many of these issues were ironed out. By this point, there were still a handful of libraries that made writing complex interfaces with cross-browser support a little easier. Jquery UI, the first component library I used, supported accordions and other widgets. But the browser is constantly evolving, and we now have a native way of implementing this accordion... - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
  • Best ReactJS library for Drag-n-Drop Table for plugin Admin view?
    Because WordPress is already have these jQuery & jQuery UI libraries (https://jqueryui.com/). Source: about 2 years ago
  • jQuery 3.6.2 Released
    We still use jQuery + jQuery UI on our website because it is basically battle tested through 15+ years. https://jqueryui.com/ It is easy as hell. What's there to not like? I don't care to be called names or being old fashioned. I also don't care about "right" tooling for frontend. As far it works and it is robust and it is going to be around for many years, I am fine with it. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Windows Communication Foundation and jQuery UI, you can also consider the following products

ASP.NET - ASP.NET is a free web framework for building great Web sites and Web applications using HTML, CSS and JavaScript.

jQuery - The Write Less, Do More, JavaScript Library.

Font Awesome - Font Awesome makes it easy to add vector icons and social logos to your website. And version 5 is redesigned and built from the ground up!

React Native - A framework for building native apps with React

Material Design for Bootstrap - Material Design for Bootstrap is a Bootstrap compatible theme for use in Bootstrap based application.

Composer - Composer is a tool for dependency management in PHP.

Loading...