Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

websocketd VS Crow

Compare websocketd VS Crow and see what are their differences

Hive
Seamless project management and collaboration for your team. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

websocketd logo websocketd

Turn any program that uses STDIN/STDOUT into a WebSocket server. Like inetd, but for WebSockets.

Crow logo Crow

A Fast and Easy to use microframework for the web.
  • websocketd Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-12-27
  • Crow Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-03

websocketd features and specs

  • Simplicity
    Websocketd is straightforward to use, turning any local executable into a WebSocket server. It requires minimal configuration and setup, making it accessible for beginners.
  • Language Agnostic
    Since websocketd can wrap any executable, developers can use it with any programming language they prefer, allowing for flexibility in choosing the right tools for their projects.
  • Lightweight
    Websocketd is a lightweight tool with minimal overhead, making it ideal for projects that require efficient WebSocket communication without the need for a full-featured server.
  • Rapid Prototyping
    The ease of setting up websocketd allows developers to quickly prototype WebSocket applications and test new ideas without significant investment in infrastructure.
  • Open Source
    As an open-source project, websocketd benefits from community contributions and transparency, ensuring continuous improvement and trustworthiness of the software.

Possible disadvantages of websocketd

  • Limited Features
    While its simplicity is an advantage, websocketd's feature set is minimal. It does not provide advanced capabilities such as authentication, performance monitoring, or compression.
  • Lack of Built-in Scalability
    Websocketd doesn't come with built-in support for high scalability or distributed systems, which can be a limitation for applications needing to handle a large number of simultaneous connections.
  • No Native HTTP Support
    Websocketd is focused solely on WebSockets, so it lacks native support for serving regular HTTP endpoints, which may necessitate additional infrastructure for projects requiring mixed communication.
  • Manual Process Management
    Developers have to handle process management manually, which includes ensuring the stability of wrapped programs and addressing issues that arise from resource limits.
  • Community Size
    Compared to more established tools, websocketd has a smaller community, which can lead to fewer resources in terms of documentation, tutorials, and community support.

Crow features and specs

  • Asynchronous Handling
    Crow supports asynchronous request handling, allowing for efficient management of high numbers of simultaneous connections.
  • Modern C++ Standards
    Utilizes modern C++ features to ensure robust and efficient performance, leveraging C++11 and newer standards.
  • Simple and Lightweight
    Designed to provide a web application framework with simplicity and minimal resource usage, making it suitable for embedded systems.
  • JSON Parsing
    Includes built-in support for parsing and handling JSON, making it easier to work with web APIs and RESTful services.
  • Routing
    Offers flexible routing capabilities, allowing for easy mapping of URLs to handlers with path parameters and regular expressions.

Possible disadvantages of Crow

  • Limited Ecosystem
    Compared to more established frameworks, Crow has a smaller community and fewer third-party libraries and tools available.
  • Learning Curve
    Requires familiarity with modern C++ features, which might be challenging for developers not well-versed in these standards.
  • Lack of Comprehensive Documentation
    The documentation may not be as extensive or detailed as other frameworks, potentially making it harder to troubleshoot or learn advanced features.
  • Scalability
    While suitable for many use cases, it might not be the best choice for very large-scale applications requiring extensive middleware functionality.

websocketd videos

No websocketd videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Crow videos

+ Add

The Crow (1994) - Movie Review

More videos:

  • Review - The Crow (1994) Retrospective / Review
  • Review - Siskel & Ebert Review The Crow

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to websocketd and Crow)

websocketd

Crow

Developer Tools
71 71%
Developer Tools
29% 29
Project Management
20 20%
Project Management
80% 80
APIs
100 100%
APIs
0% 0
Cloud Storage
0 0%
Cloud Storage
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using websocketd and Crow. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Crow should be more popular than websocketd. It has been mentiond 12 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

websocketd mentions (4)

  • ht: Headless Terminal
    Reminds me quite a bit of websocketd as well, which converts a stdin/stdout program to a websocket: http://websocketd.com/. - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago
  • Structured Logging with Slog
    I hadn't even considered collecting traces/spans in this way yet, and have taken the approach of "stuff outputting logs in JSON format to stderr/local file". I usually end up writing a (temporary, structured) log message with the relevant span tags, but wouldn't it would be much better to run the actual trace/span code and be able to verify it locally without the ad-hoc log message? The prototype I built is a web... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • WebSocket to TCP bridge for game servers? Alternative to websockify?
    I also used to use this (http://websocketd.com/) along with netcat(1) before just biting the bullet and writing my own websocket library for our server as we needed to scale up slightly. Source: about 2 years ago
  • C or C++ as web app backend?
    Http://websocketd.com/ (Runs command line C or C++ programs as websocket programs, similar to inetd / CGI). Source: over 3 years ago

Crow mentions (12)

  • Transport agnostic Websocket library
    I recommend Crow, it's a web framework that supports HTTP and Websockets. It's a bit larger than being only there to just let you compose or decode a packet. But I'm pretty sure everything you mentioned is there already :). Source: almost 3 years ago
  • Can I use C++ in the backend ?? Any frameworks there ??
    I've been working on Crow for quite a while now, it's a pretty cool framework IMO. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • making a web server in c++?
    If you really want to use C++, check out something like Crow, https://crowcpp.org/ and same thing, you can pass messages between the server and your application. Source: about 3 years ago
  • Crow finally gets rid of `CROW_MAIN` macro
    Crow is a C++ web framework being developed and maintained by myself and a couple developers. Source: over 3 years ago
  • C or C++ as web app backend?
    Https://crowcpp.org/ (C++ API similar to Python flask). Source: over 3 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing websocketd and Crow, you can also consider the following products

Hook Relay - So you want to add webhooks to your app, and after having worked with the webhooks that Stripe provides, you want yours to be as great as theirs.

Cutelyst - Qt-based web framework using the elegant approach of Catalyst framework

Oatpp - Zero-dependency, performance oriented Web Framework for Rapid development in C++

WP Webhooks Pro - Do everything within WordPress without WordPress.

Crow framework - C++ micro web framework inspired by Python Flask

soketi - Your simple, fast, and resilient open-source WS server.

Loading...