Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Crow framework VS websocketd

Compare Crow framework VS websocketd and see what are their differences

ASocks
Clear, Fast & Unlimited. Residential & Mobile Proxies For Best Price. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

Crow framework logo Crow framework

C++ micro web framework inspired by Python Flask

websocketd logo websocketd

Turn any program that uses STDIN/STDOUT into a WebSocket server. Like inetd, but for WebSockets.
  • Crow framework Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-24
  • websocketd Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-12-27

Crow framework features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

websocketd features and specs

  • Simplicity
    Websocketd is straightforward to use, turning any local executable into a WebSocket server. It requires minimal configuration and setup, making it accessible for beginners.
  • Language Agnostic
    Since websocketd can wrap any executable, developers can use it with any programming language they prefer, allowing for flexibility in choosing the right tools for their projects.
  • Lightweight
    Websocketd is a lightweight tool with minimal overhead, making it ideal for projects that require efficient WebSocket communication without the need for a full-featured server.
  • Rapid Prototyping
    The ease of setting up websocketd allows developers to quickly prototype WebSocket applications and test new ideas without significant investment in infrastructure.
  • Open Source
    As an open-source project, websocketd benefits from community contributions and transparency, ensuring continuous improvement and trustworthiness of the software.

Possible disadvantages of websocketd

  • Limited Features
    While its simplicity is an advantage, websocketd's feature set is minimal. It does not provide advanced capabilities such as authentication, performance monitoring, or compression.
  • Lack of Built-in Scalability
    Websocketd doesn't come with built-in support for high scalability or distributed systems, which can be a limitation for applications needing to handle a large number of simultaneous connections.
  • No Native HTTP Support
    Websocketd is focused solely on WebSockets, so it lacks native support for serving regular HTTP endpoints, which may necessitate additional infrastructure for projects requiring mixed communication.
  • Manual Process Management
    Developers have to handle process management manually, which includes ensuring the stability of wrapped programs and addressing issues that arise from resource limits.
  • Community Size
    Compared to more established tools, websocketd has a smaller community, which can lead to fewer resources in terms of documentation, tutorials, and community support.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Crow framework and websocketd)

Crow framework

websocketd

Cloud Storage
100 100%
Cloud Storage
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
Developer Tools
100% 100
IDE
100 100%
IDE
0% 0
APIs
0 0%
APIs
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Crow framework and websocketd. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Crow framework should be more popular than websocketd. It has been mentiond 6 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Crow framework mentions (6)

  • VueJS goes to microcontroller firmware. This website runs in ESP32 board, with frontend is made with VueJS, TailwindCSS and backend is written in C++.
    I did something similar in the past and used https://github.com/ipkn/crow as web server, in case you want to not implement the web part yourself. Otherwise amazing job! Source: about 2 years ago
  • C++ to Browser JS Framework Recommendations
    Open socket, serve a html page, implement GET/PUT or find framework that do https://github.com/ipkn/crow. Source: over 2 years ago
  • I forked Crow, an abandoned C++ Web Framework. And I'm currently maintaining it.
    Last year I was looking to port a Flask REST API I made to C++ because speed and why not. I went through a few C++ frameworks but eventually chose the abandoned since 2017 Crow. It was by far the easiest to set up and work with (being inspired by Flask in the first place), and it didn't hurt that it supported Websockets. Source: almost 4 years ago
  • C++ vs C# .net 5
    All right Op feel free to check this micro framework out if your company is going to build a rest api in C++ https://github.com/ipkn/crow . Source: almost 4 years ago
  • cpprestsdk in maintenance mode
    I haven't used any of the following libraries/frameworks but maybe some of them will fit for your needs: - Crow micro web framework. Source: almost 4 years ago
View more

websocketd mentions (4)

  • ht: Headless Terminal
    Reminds me quite a bit of websocketd as well, which converts a stdin/stdout program to a websocket: http://websocketd.com/. - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago
  • Structured Logging with Slog
    I hadn't even considered collecting traces/spans in this way yet, and have taken the approach of "stuff outputting logs in JSON format to stderr/local file". I usually end up writing a (temporary, structured) log message with the relevant span tags, but wouldn't it would be much better to run the actual trace/span code and be able to verify it locally without the ad-hoc log message? The prototype I built is a web... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • WebSocket to TCP bridge for game servers? Alternative to websockify?
    I also used to use this (http://websocketd.com/) along with netcat(1) before just biting the bullet and writing my own websocket library for our server as we needed to scale up slightly. Source: about 2 years ago
  • C or C++ as web app backend?
    Http://websocketd.com/ (Runs command line C or C++ programs as websocket programs, similar to inetd / CGI). Source: over 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Crow framework and websocketd, you can also consider the following products

Oatpp - Zero-dependency, performance oriented Web Framework for Rapid development in C++

Hook Relay - So you want to add webhooks to your app, and after having worked with the webhooks that Stripe provides, you want yours to be as great as theirs.

Crow - A Fast and Easy to use microframework for the web.

Cutelyst - Qt-based web framework using the elegant approach of Catalyst framework

WP Webhooks Pro - Do everything within WordPress without WordPress.

Silicon web framework - High performance, middleware oriented C++14 http web framework

Loading...