Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

WebSocket-Node VS Eclipse Jetty

Compare WebSocket-Node VS Eclipse Jetty and see what are their differences

WebSocket-Node logo WebSocket-Node

A WebSocket Implementation for Node.JS ( Draft -08 through the final RFC 6455 )

Eclipse Jetty logo Eclipse Jetty

Jetty is a highly scalable modular servlet engine and http server that natively supports many modern protocols like SPDY and WebSockets.
  • WebSocket-Node Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-18
  • Eclipse Jetty Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-19

WebSocket-Node features and specs

  • Simplicity
    WebSocket-Node provides a straightforward and easy-to-use API that allows developers to quickly set up WebSocket communication in Node.js.
  • Compliance
    It implements the WebSocket Protocol as outlined in RFC6455, ensuring compatibility with the standard WebSocket implementation.
  • Event-Driven
    Designed to leverage Node.js's event-driven architecture, allowing for efficient real-time data exchange.
  • Lightweight
    Being a lightweight library, it doesn't add significant overhead to applications, which is beneficial in terms of performance.
  • Community Support
    As an open-source project available on GitHub, it has an active community that contributes to its improvement and maintenance.

Possible disadvantages of WebSocket-Node

  • Limited Features
    Compared to more comprehensive libraries, WebSocket-Node might lack some advanced features or extensions that are available in more complete frameworks.
  • Maintenance
    Depending on community contributions for updates and fixes can lead to uncertainty in terms of long-term maintenance and support.
  • Scalability
    Handling a very large number of concurrent connections might require additional consideration and architecture adjustments, as it is fundamental.
  • Lack of Built-in Reconnection Logic
    The library does not include native support for automatic reconnection, which developers need to implement manually if needed.

Eclipse Jetty features and specs

  • Lightweight
    Jetty has a small memory footprint and is designed to be lightweight, making it suitable for resource-constrained environments.
  • Embeddable
    Jetty can be embedded directly into applications, providing greater flexibility and allowing developers to manage the server from within their applications.
  • Scalable
    Jetty is capable of handling a large number of simultaneous connections, making it ideal for applications that require high concurrency and scalability.
  • Active Development
    Jetty is actively maintained and continuously updated, ensuring that it keeps up with the latest standards and security practices.
  • Support for WebSockets and HTTP/2
    Jetty includes built-in support for modern web protocols like WebSockets and HTTP/2, which can enhance performance and provide additional functionality.
  • Modular Architecture
    Jetty’s modular architecture allows developers to include only the needed components, further optimizing resource usage and performance.
  • Good Documentation
    Jetty offers comprehensive documentation and examples, making it easier for developers to get started and troubleshoot issues.

Possible disadvantages of Eclipse Jetty

  • Learning Curve
    Because of its numerous features and configuration options, Jetty may have a steeper learning curve for newcomers compared to simpler server options.
  • Community Support
    While Jetty has a passionate user base, its community support may not be as extensive as more widely adopted solutions like Apache Tomcat.
  • Default Configuration
    Jetty’s default settings may not always be optimal for all use cases, requiring developers to spend additional time tweaking configurations for specific needs.
  • Limited Commercial Support
    Jetty has fewer commercial support options available compared to some other enterprise-level servers, which may be a concern for larger organizations.
  • Complexity for Small Projects
    For small or less complex projects, Jetty's feature set and capabilities may be overkill, leading to unnecessary complexity and overhead.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to WebSocket-Node and Eclipse Jetty)
Developer Tools
32 32%
68% 68
Web And Application Servers
Application Server
0 0%
100% 100
Renting
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using WebSocket-Node and Eclipse Jetty. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare WebSocket-Node and Eclipse Jetty

WebSocket-Node Reviews

We have no reviews of WebSocket-Node yet.
Be the first one to post

Eclipse Jetty Reviews

Top 10 Open Source Java and JavaEE Application Servers
JOnAS provides a fully compliant EJB container through EasyBeans and is available with an embedded Tomcat or Jetty web container which is 1.6 JVM supported, and can run on numerous operating systems including Linux, Windows, AIX, and many Posix platforms.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing WebSocket-Node and Eclipse Jetty, you can also consider the following products

Socket.io - Realtime application framework (Node.JS server)

Apache Tomcat - An open source software implementation of the Java Servlet and JavaServer Pages technologies

gevent - gevent is a coroutine -based Python networking library that uses greenlet to provide a high-level...

Microsoft IIS - Internet Information Services is a web server for Microsoft Windows

Lightstreamer - Lightstreamer is a server for delivering real-time messages to browser-based and mobile...

LiteSpeed Web Server - LiteSpeed Web Server (LSWS) is a high-performance Apache drop-in replacement.