Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Webpack VS Private Packagist

Compare Webpack VS Private Packagist and see what are their differences

ASocks
Clear, Fast & Unlimited. Residential & Mobile Proxies For Best Price. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Webpack logo Webpack

Webpack is a module bundler. Its main purpose is to bundle JavaScript files for usage in a browser, yet it is also capable of transforming, bundling, or packaging just about any resource or asset.

Private Packagist logo Private Packagist

Composer package archive as a service for PHP
  • Webpack Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-13
  • Private Packagist Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-22

Webpack features and specs

  • Modular Bundling
    Webpack efficiently bundles all your modules (JavaScript, CSS, images, etc.) into manageable chunks, minimizing HTTP requests and enhancing load performance.
  • Code Splitting
    It allows splitting your codebase into 'chunks' which can be loaded on demand. This leads to faster initial page loads as only necessary chunks are loaded initially.
  • Hot Module Replacement (HMR)
    HMR allows you to update modules without needing a full refresh. This improves development speed and efficiency as live changes are instantly reflected in the application.
  • Advanced Configuration
    Webpack is highly configurable, accommodating various needs from simple setups to complex, custom configurations, making it versatile for different projects.
  • Strong Plugin Ecosystem
    There is a rich ecosystem of plugins available to extend Webpack's capabilities, such as minification, asset management, and more.
  • Tree Shaking
    Webpack supports tree shaking, a method to eliminate dead code from your bundle, resulting in more efficient, smaller output files.
  • Dependency Management
    It handles dependencies among modules effectively, automatically managing module load order and avoiding conflicts.

Possible disadvantages of Webpack

  • Complex Configuration
    Its extensive configuration options can be overwhelming, particularly for beginners, leading to a steep learning curve.
  • Build Time
    Complex configurations and large projects can result in slower build times, impacting development speed.
  • Documentation Issues
    Despite improvements, there are instances where Webpack's documentation might lack clarity, making it harder to find solutions for specific configurations.
  • Overhead for Simple Projects
    For small and simple projects, Webpack might be overkill, adding unnecessary complexity and setup time.
  • Compatibility Issues
    Occasionally, Webpack updates can lead to breaking changes, which may require significant adjustments to your configuration and codebase.

Private Packagist features and specs

  • Centralized Package Management
    Private Packagist offers a centralized platform to manage PHP dependencies, making it easier for organizations to control the distribution and versioning of their internal libraries and third-party packages.
  • Security
    By using Private Packagist, organizations can ensure that their packages are coming from a secure and trusted source, reducing the risk of using malicious or compromised packages from public repositories.
  • Access Control
    It allows users to assign access rights and roles to team members, which helps maintain security and ensures that only authorized personnel can manage and access specific packages.
  • Custom Domains
    Organizations can use custom domains for their private packages, helping in maintaining brand identity and allowing for easier package management within the company's ecosystem.
  • Integrated with Composer
    Private Packagist is natively integrated with Composer, the PHP dependency manager, ensuring seamless adoption and easy integration into existing workflows.

Possible disadvantages of Private Packagist

  • Cost
    Private Packagist is a paid service, which might not be ideal for smaller organizations or individual developers who have tight budget constraints.
  • Dependency on External Service
    Relying on a third-party service for package management means that any downtime or service interruptions could potentially impact development workflows.
  • Complex Setup
    Compared to using the default Composer setup, configuring and managing an additional platform might incur some initial complexity and a learning curve for development teams.
  • Limited to PHP
    Being a PHP-focused service, it is not suitable for projects that require management of dependencies for multiple programming languages outside the PHP ecosystem.

Webpack videos

+ Add

Learn Webpack - Full Tutorial for Beginners

More videos:

  • Review - Core Concepts of Webpack
  • Review - Learn Webpack Pt. 6: Cache Busting and Plugins

Private Packagist videos

+ Add

Interview - Private Packagist Nils Adermann, Mathias Schreiber

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Webpack and Private Packagist)

Webpack

Private Packagist

Web Application Bundler
100 100%
Web Application Bundler
0% 0
Package Manager
0 0%
Package Manager
100% 100
JS Build Tools
100 100%
JS Build Tools
0% 0
Developer Tools
89 89%
Developer Tools
11% 11

User comments

Share your experience with using Webpack and Private Packagist. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Webpack and Private Packagist

Webpack Reviews

Rollup v. Webpack v. Parcel
Tool Prod Build Time One Prod Build Time Two Prod Build Time Three Prod Build Time Avg Parcel 738.509 s 35.364 s 35.592 s 269.82 avg s Rollup 0.712 s 0.665 s 0.714 s 0.697 avg s Webpack 3.636 s 3.805 s 4.305 s 3.915 avg s
Source: x-team.com
If you’ve ever configured Webpack, Parcel will blow your mind!
document.body.className = document.body.className.replace(/(^|\s)is-noJs(\s|$)/, "$1is-js$2")HomepageHomepageJavascriptBecome a memberSign inGet startedIf you’ve ever configured Webpack, Parcel will blow your mind!And how to hit the ground running with Parcel.Ibrahim ButtBlockedUnblockFollowFollowingMar 16, 2018Click here to share this article on LinkedIn »Zero...
Source: medium.com
First impressions with Parcel JS
From first impressions and experience, my take currently would be as follows. Webpack is generally going to be more flexible. It also places a bit more power in the developers hands to make bundling happen exactly as desired. That isn’t to say you shouldn’t use Parcel though. Where Parcel excels is the fact you don’t configure it. You will still need to configure plugins for...
Source: codeburst.io
Parcel vs webpack - Jakob Lind
Webpack is the stable choice. You will not get fired for picking webpack. But you don’t get as much stuff for free such as optimized bundles, and code splitting.
Source: blog.jakoblind.no

Private Packagist Reviews

We have no reviews of Private Packagist yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Webpack seems to be a lot more popular than Private Packagist. While we know about 243 links to Webpack, we've tracked only 7 mentions of Private Packagist. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Webpack mentions (243)

  • Dark Souls CRUD Arena - The Prisoner Approach
    To then serve to the browser. If I was using something like Vite or Webpack I would have gotten this handling for free. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • You Don’t Know JS Yet: My Weekly Journey Through JavaScript Mastery
    The JS code gets transpiled by tools like Babel, then bundled (often by Webpack) into a single or few files (like bundle.js). This optimizes the website to load faster, as the browser can fetch everything from one file instead of multiple. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Webpack 5: The Next Generation Module Bundler
    Remember that Webpack is highly configurable, and this article only scratches the surface of what's possible. Be sure to check the official Webpack documentation for more detailed information and advanced configurations. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Discover the power of microfrontends: A revolution in frontend development
    With Webpack 5, a new feature has helped microfrontends proliferate: Module Federation. Module Federation allows JavaScript code to be loaded — synchronously or asynchronously — at runtime. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Which JavaScript Bundler Is Right for You? A Deep Dive into Webpack, Vite, and More
    Webpack is one of the oldest and most widely used bundlers in web development, created by Tobias Koppers in 2012. It gained popularity after Browserify and RequireJS and has become the go-to choice for managing complex projects. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
View more

Private Packagist mentions (7)

  • Private Packagist - has anyone used and can tell me if it might fit in my scenario?
    I was told in another forum to look at Private Packagist... But how is that different? Instead of installing packages from packagist.org.. You pay to Packagist.com to do the same thing? You just download from packagist.com cloud instead of packagist.org? Source: over 2 years ago
  • Need a secured way to be able to use Composer
    We have a private Satis instance. Our ITSec team reviews all packages before we add them to Satis. Packagist.com is available for us but the CI-CD servers can reach only the private Satis. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • Need a secured way to be able to use Composer
    Https://packagist.com maybe tell them about a local packagist install. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • Need a secured way to be able to use Composer
    "[MANAGER] requested this to be done in PHP. You as IT will know that most modern programming and scripting languages work only with packaging software properly. Composer sends requests (majority of cases) to packagist.com and to github.com. It will add thousands of hours to do everything that composer does manually. Please sign here to authorize the usage of 4000 hours and the possible delay of 4000 hours.... Source: almost 3 years ago
  • What do you think of SaaS Frameworks?
    Another downside that only really exists with non-PHP boilerplates is getting updates isn'T as easy. With PHP we're able to use packagist.com and make our code available via composer. Other languages don't have this so SaaS Pegasus provides zip downloads and Gravity provides access to a GitHub repo. This means you have to apply bug fixes yourself. With Parthenon, you do composer update and you'll get the latest... Source: almost 3 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Webpack and Private Packagist, you can also consider the following products

rollup.js - Rollup is a module bundler for JavaScript which compiles small pieces of code into a larger piece such as application.

Satis - Satis is a simple static Composer repository generator

Parcel - Blazing fast, zero configuration web application bundler

Sonatype Nexus Repository - The world's only repository manager with FREE support for popular formats.

Babel - Babel is a compiler for writing next generation JavaScript.

Artifactory - The world’s most advanced repository manager.

Loading...