Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Webhooks by Zapier VS websocketd

Compare Webhooks by Zapier VS websocketd and see what are their differences

Webhooks by Zapier logo Webhooks by Zapier

Move Your Data Instantly With Webhooks

websocketd logo websocketd

Turn any program that uses STDIN/STDOUT into a WebSocket server. Like inetd, but for WebSockets.
  • Webhooks by Zapier Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-02-07
  • websocketd Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-12-27

Webhooks by Zapier features and specs

  • Flexibility
    Webhooks by Zapier provide flexibility by allowing integration with any service that supports webhooks, even if it is not natively supported by Zapier.
  • Real-time Data Transfer
    Webhooks facilitate real-time data transfer, allowing updates and information to be sent immediately when events occur, rather than waiting for periodic checks.
  • Cost-Efficiency
    By enabling specific triggers and actions without constant polling, webhooks can be more cost-efficient in terms of API usage limits and processing overhead.

Possible disadvantages of Webhooks by Zapier

  • Setup Complexity
    Setting up webhooks can be complex for users who are not familiar with web development or API concepts, as it requires some technical knowledge to implement correctly.
  • Potential for Missed Events
    If the receiving service is down or has issues at the time the webhook is sent, there's a risk of missing an event, as webhooks typically do not retry sending the data.
  • Security Concerns
    Since webhooks send data over HTTP, there are security implications such as the need to manage authentication, encryption, and validation to safeguard against unauthorized access and data breaches.

websocketd features and specs

  • Simplicity
    Websocketd is straightforward to use, turning any local executable into a WebSocket server. It requires minimal configuration and setup, making it accessible for beginners.
  • Language Agnostic
    Since websocketd can wrap any executable, developers can use it with any programming language they prefer, allowing for flexibility in choosing the right tools for their projects.
  • Lightweight
    Websocketd is a lightweight tool with minimal overhead, making it ideal for projects that require efficient WebSocket communication without the need for a full-featured server.
  • Rapid Prototyping
    The ease of setting up websocketd allows developers to quickly prototype WebSocket applications and test new ideas without significant investment in infrastructure.
  • Open Source
    As an open-source project, websocketd benefits from community contributions and transparency, ensuring continuous improvement and trustworthiness of the software.

Possible disadvantages of websocketd

  • Limited Features
    While its simplicity is an advantage, websocketd's feature set is minimal. It does not provide advanced capabilities such as authentication, performance monitoring, or compression.
  • Lack of Built-in Scalability
    Websocketd doesn't come with built-in support for high scalability or distributed systems, which can be a limitation for applications needing to handle a large number of simultaneous connections.
  • No Native HTTP Support
    Websocketd is focused solely on WebSockets, so it lacks native support for serving regular HTTP endpoints, which may necessitate additional infrastructure for projects requiring mixed communication.
  • Manual Process Management
    Developers have to handle process management manually, which includes ensuring the stability of wrapped programs and addressing issues that arise from resource limits.
  • Community Size
    Compared to more established tools, websocketd has a smaller community, which can lead to fewer resources in terms of documentation, tutorials, and community support.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Webhooks by Zapier and websocketd)
Developer Tools
62 62%
38% 38
APIs
67 67%
33% 33
API Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Internet Of Things
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Webhooks by Zapier and websocketd. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Webhooks by Zapier should be more popular than websocketd. It has been mentiond 8 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Webhooks by Zapier mentions (8)

  • Integrate Django with a modern productivity app such as Notion, ClickUp, monday, etc.
    Connect the target system and your Django via something like zappier via webhooks https://zapier.com/features/webhooks. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Zap Help : Apify + Google Sheets
    Is this an available trigger for Apify? If not, then it's possible to replicate this via webhooks. So the trigger would be a Catch Hook step. You can pass the city name as a variable from the other zap. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Slack Notification Based On ZenDesk Queues?
    Only directly via their API and thus via a Zapier Webhook. It's not an available Zapier trigger or action for the current Zendesk integration. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Catching webhooks in PowerAutomate
    I'm currently using Zapier to catch webhooks. Zapier has a webhook connector ( Webhooks: Use Zapier to Move Your Data Instantly ) which is easy to use. Does PowerAutomate have something similar? Source: about 3 years ago
  • Ask HN: What Comes After Webhooks?
    I guess Webhooks as a service would come next and alleviate some of these issues. As discussed here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27528202 https://zapier.com/page/webhooks/ https://support.discord.com/hc/en-us/articles/228383668-Intro-to-Webhooks. - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
View more

websocketd mentions (4)

  • ht: Headless Terminal
    Reminds me quite a bit of websocketd as well, which converts a stdin/stdout program to a websocket: http://websocketd.com/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • Structured Logging with Slog
    I hadn't even considered collecting traces/spans in this way yet, and have taken the approach of "stuff outputting logs in JSON format to stderr/local file". I usually end up writing a (temporary, structured) log message with the relevant span tags, but wouldn't it would be much better to run the actual trace/span code and be able to verify it locally without the ad-hoc log message? The prototype I built is a web... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
  • WebSocket to TCP bridge for game servers? Alternative to websockify?
    I also used to use this (http://websocketd.com/) along with netcat(1) before just biting the bullet and writing my own websocket library for our server as we needed to scale up slightly. Source: over 2 years ago
  • C or C++ as web app backend?
    Http://websocketd.com/ (Runs command line C or C++ programs as websocket programs, similar to inetd / CGI). Source: over 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Webhooks by Zapier and websocketd, you can also consider the following products

Webhook.site - Instantly generate a free, unique URL and email address to test, inspect, and automate (with a visual workflow editor and scripts) incoming HTTP requests and emails.

Crow - A Fast and Easy to use microframework for the web.

Hookdeck - Hookdeck makes it simple to build and deploy reliable, testable, and debuggable applications that rely on webhooks.

soketi - Your simple, fast, and resilient open-source WS server.

WP Webhooks Pro - Do everything within WordPress without WordPress.

BrainyCP - Multi-functional server hosting control panel for Linux