Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

VitePress VS Wiki.js

Compare VitePress VS Wiki.js and see what are their differences

VitePress logo VitePress

Vite & Vue powered static site generator.

Wiki.js logo Wiki.js

An open source, modern and powerful wiki app built on Node.js, Git, and Markdown.
  • VitePress Landing page
    Landing page //
    2024-04-12
  • Wiki.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-01-24

VitePress features and specs

  • Fast Performance
    VitePress leverages Vite's lightning-fast development server and build process, resulting in quicker reloads and optimized builds.
  • Simple Setup
    It's easy to set up and configure, making it accessible for developers who want to quickly get started with documentation.
  • Vue.js Support
    Built on top of Vue.js, VitePress allows the use of Vue components within markdown files, enabling rich, interactive content.
  • Markdown Based
    Documents are primarily written in markdown, which is simple and widely used, making it easy for contributors to write content.
  • Theming and Customization
    Offers good support for custom themes and styling, allowing users to tailor the appearance and functionality of their documentation.

Possible disadvantages of VitePress

  • Limited Features
    Compared to more mature systems like Docusaurus or GitBook, VitePress might lack some advanced features out-of-the-box.
  • Community Size
    Being relatively new compared to other documentation tools, VitePress has a smaller community, which may affect the availability of third-party plugins and support.
  • Under Development
    As it is still under active development, VitePress might undergo significant changes, which could introduce breaking changes or instability.
  • Limited Integrations
    Currently, it may not offer as many integrations with other tools and services compared to longer-established platforms.

Wiki.js features and specs

  • Open-Source
    Wiki.js is open-source software, which means it is free to use, and the source code is available for anyone to review, modify, and contribute to.
  • Modern Interface
    The platform features a sleek, modern interface that is user-friendly and customizable, employing responsive design that works well on various devices.
  • Markdown Support
    Wiki.js natively supports Markdown, which is a simple and efficient way to format text. This makes content creation quick and easy for users familiar with Markdown.
  • Extensibility
    The system supports numerous modules and extensions, allowing for high customization to suit the needs of different projects and teams.
  • Multi-Language
    It supports multiple languages, making it accessible and usable by a global audience without the need for additional translation tools.
  • Authentication Methods
    Wiki.js integrates with various authentication methods, including LDAP, OAuth, and even custom authentication, providing flexible security options.
  • Real-Time Collaboration
    With real-time collaborative editing, multiple users can work on the same document simultaneously, improving efficiency and teamwork.
  • Content Management
    The platform includes robust version control and content management features, ensuring that all changes are tracked and reversible.
  • Search Functionality
    Advanced search functionality ensures users can quickly find the information they are looking for, enhancing the overall user experience.

Possible disadvantages of Wiki.js

  • Complex Setup
    Setting up Wiki.js can be more complex compared to other wiki solutions, requiring knowledge of JavaScript and server management.
  • Performance Issues
    Some users have reported performance issues on larger installations, indicating that scalability might be a concern for very large deployments.
  • Limited WYSIWYG Editor
    The WYSIWYG editor is not as feature-rich as some other wiki platforms, which might be a drawback for users who prefer a more robust visual editing experience.
  • Dependency on Node.js
    Wiki.js requires Node.js to run, which could be a limitation for environments where installing and maintaining Node.js is not feasible.
  • Steeper Learning Curve
    While the interface is modern and sleek, there can be a steeper learning curve for users who are not familiar with Markdown or the various configuration options.
  • Limited Plugin Ecosystem
    Compared to more established wiki platforms, Wiki.js has a relatively smaller plugin ecosystem, which could limit some functionalities out of the box.
  • Documentation Gaps
    Users have reported that the official documentation can be lacking in certain areas, making troubleshooting and advanced configuration more challenging.

VitePress videos

Exploring the New World of VitePress

Wiki.js videos

WIKI.JS REVIEW + 1 CLICK INSTALL + DEMO TUTORIAL + $50 FREE TRIAL 👨‍💻

More videos:

  • Tutorial - How To Deploy Wiki.js on Ubuntu 18.04 With Nginx web server
  • Review - Tenha sua própria plataforma de wiki com o Wiki.js

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to VitePress and Wiki.js)
Documentation
38 38%
62% 62
WiKis
0 0%
100% 100
Documentation As A Service & Tools
Knowledge Base
16 16%
84% 84

User comments

Share your experience with using VitePress and Wiki.js. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare VitePress and Wiki.js

VitePress Reviews

We have no reviews of VitePress yet.
Be the first one to post

Wiki.js Reviews

Top 12 Self-hosted Wiki Engines for 2024: A Comprehensive Guide
Wiki.js is an exceptional open-source wiki software that boasts impressive power and extensibility. Its remarkable key features include seamless compatibility with a variety of databases (such as PostgreSQL, MySQL, MariaDB, MS SQL Server, SQLite), an extensive and user-friendly admin area, a performance-driven design utilizing Node.js, and a customizable appearance with both...
Source: medevel.com
The 10 Best Self-hosted Wiki Software for Linux System
The best thing is Wiki.js supports the maximum types of available databases, including MySQL and MariaDB. It has a built-in authentication feature that supports password encrypted file sharing. It allows integrating with other authentication services along with 2FA such as Google, GitHub, Microsoft, and many more. Wiki.js offers a wide range of features, which makes it one...
Best 11 Open-source Free Wiki Engines for teams and enterprise in 2022
Wiki.js is our first pick here because it is an enterprise-grade Wiki engine with dozens of features and options. It exceeds other engines in performance, features, and customizations.
Source: medevel.com
The Best 20 Wiki Software For Your Business& Internal Knowledge for 2022
Wiki.js is a modern version of traditional wiki platforms. It is an open-source wiki tool with an intuitive interface, easy installation process, and a bundle of features that make wiki creation a fun-filled experience. Based on Node.js, the software comes with a wide array of modules that can be turned on and off depending on which features you need and which ones you don’t.

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Wiki.js should be more popular than VitePress. It has been mentiond 68 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

VitePress mentions (7)

  • Between Diapers and Development – How My Blog Came to Life with Eleventy
    I first tried VitePress, thinking it would be easy for me. I followed the Getting Started Guide. But even during setup, I realized: I'd need time to explore themes, actions, and features. I’d need at least an afternoon with full focus. The baby was already stirring in the carrier—so no time for that. - Source: dev.to / 28 days ago
  • Blogs Rot. Wikis Wait
    Obligatory meme: https://rakhim.org/honestly-undefined/19/ I'm personally in the top left corner and bottom right corner at the same time, which is sort of funny. I have used WordPress since 2004-2005, and I've also written a Python static site generator before using Flask + Frozen-Flask[1]. I've also made stops through tools like Sphinx, Hugo, Gatsby, and VitePress[2]. But my personal site continues to run... - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
  • Create elegant OpenAPI spec documentation with Rapi Doc and Vitepress
    Import { defineConfig } from 'vitepress' // https://vitepress.dev/reference/site-config Export default defineConfig({ ... vue: { template: { compilerOptions: { isCustomElement: (tag: string) => { return tag.indexOf('rapi-doc') >= 0; } } } }, }). - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • MdBook – a command line tool to create books with Markdown
    VitePress and Docusaurus seem decent. I think VitePress might be more suited to blogging, but I admit I haven’t actually used or tested either. https://docusaurus.io/ https://vitepress.dev/. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
  • Do not build your Gov.uk service as a single-page application
    I don't get it (really, not pretending). I know many SPAs are crap, but if SPAs were inherently crap, then all SPAs would be at least kind of crap. So, I see those website below as examples and ask myself: What's wrong with those: https://vitepress.dev/ https://www.solidjs.com/ Both are SPAs. Fast, small, working very well. Ok, they need JS to work. But honestly, how many people are not using JS because they can't... - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
View more

Wiki.js mentions (68)

  • Show HN: We built a FOSS documentation CMS with a pretty GUI
    Congrats on launching! Quick question: is this closer to WikiJS (https://js.wiki/), TinaCMS (https://tina.io/), Docusaurus (https://docusaurus.io/), or something else? - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
  • Adding a simple light box in wiki.js
    Wiki.js is a self hosted, open source Wiki that has a lot of awesome functionality. Unfortunately it's lacking some small, but important UI features, like a light box, to enlarge downsized images to it's full size. And unless you want to add a link to each image, to open it in a new tab, you would probably go for a modal view here. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • Ask HN: What are some good documentation OSS offerings
    Https://js.wiki/ is what we’ve decided to go with at my company. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • How do you host documentation for your spouse or other users?
    Can't think of anything that meets all the criteria, there's always some compromise, which might just be the way it is. For example I could 'self-host' otterwiki or wiki.js on a VPS for a pretty small monthly fee, which I could also use for other stuff that doesn't make sense for a home lab, but then I also need to deal with security since it's hosted on the internet. Or I could self-host and just accept that... Source: over 1 year ago
  • Documentation as Code for Cloud Using PlantUML
    I love PlantUML. I was always fond of it in my early days as a software engineer and still use it today, along with all the various ways to draw diagrams out there, whether it's through a web tool like draw.io or Miro or through markup like PlantUML and Mermaid. Some stuff I'd like to share with the rest: - PlantUML's default style has improved since the days of red/brown borders, pale yellow boxes, drop shadows... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing VitePress and Wiki.js, you can also consider the following products

GitBook - Modern Publishing, Simply taking your books from ideas to finished, polished books.

TiddlyWiki - a non-linear personal web notebook

Docusaurus - Easy to maintain open source documentation websites

DokuWiki - DokuWiki is a simple to use and highly versatile Open Source wiki software that doesn't require a database.

MkDocs - Project documentation with Markdown.

MediaWiki - MediaWiki is a free software wiki package written in PHP, originally for use on Wikipedia.