Software Alternatives & Reviews

Visual Studio App Center VS Steel Bank Common Lisp

Compare Visual Studio App Center VS Steel Bank Common Lisp and see what are their differences

Visual Studio App Center logo Visual Studio App Center

Continuous everything – build, test, deploy, engage, repeat

Steel Bank Common Lisp logo Steel Bank Common Lisp

Steel Bank Common Lisp (SBCL) is a high performance Common Lisp compiler.
  • Visual Studio App Center Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-04-24
  • Steel Bank Common Lisp Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-04-24

Visual Studio App Center videos

Visual Studio App Center

More videos:

  • Review - Xamarin University Presents: Ship Better Apps with Visual Studio App Center
  • Tutorial - How to upload a Xamarin.UITest to Visual Studio App Center!

Steel Bank Common Lisp videos

No Steel Bank Common Lisp videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Visual Studio App Center and Steel Bank Common Lisp)
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Programming Language
0 0%
100% 100
IDE
53 53%
47% 47
Monitoring Tools
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Visual Studio App Center and Steel Bank Common Lisp. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Visual Studio App Center should be more popular than Steel Bank Common Lisp. It has been mentiond 24 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Visual Studio App Center mentions (24)

  • Build for IOS
    Appcenter will allow you to build your app for iOS and install on your device without submitting to the App Store. https://appcenter.ms/. Source: 10 months ago
  • Github file size limits
    We've been using app center for build distribution (https://appcenter.ms/). Source: about 1 year ago
  • A friend and I have spent way too much time sharing builds so we built this free tool!
    But, https://appcenter.ms/ and others like it are already available with generous free tiers and a lot more features (which you don't have to use, but can grow into), not to mention GitHub actions as others have noted. Does this advantages over existing, standard solutions? Source: about 1 year ago
  • Is there a service to let us run our app remotely on chosen hardware and monitor logging?
    There are lots of choices. Google android device testing. Offhand https://appcenter.ms comes to mind. Source: about 1 year ago
  • Using React Native for a cross-platform app, without a Mac
    You don t need a mac, use microsofts app center to build it. https://appcenter.ms. Source: over 1 year ago
View more

Steel Bank Common Lisp mentions (5)

  • Not only Clojure – Chez Scheme: Lisp with native code speed
    Tangential: if we're talking Lisp and native code speed, Steel Bank Common Lisp (by default) compiles everything to machine code. [0] https://sbcl.org. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
  • A few newbie questions about lisp
    Q5: Get http://sbcl.org/. Install https://quicklisp.org/. SBCL is the implementation that's the lowest friction, and Quicklisp is a package manager that's almost* painless. Source: 12 months ago
  • [C++20][safety] static_assert is all you need (no leaks, no UB)
    That is what we do in Lisp. Try sbcl if you haven't tried it yet. Source: about 1 year ago
  • Trying to wrap my head around `xbps-src`
    I want to add the sbcl-doc subpackage (the manual for SBCL in GNU Info format), but first I need to understand how to write package definitions. As far as I understand there are the "templates" which are shell scripts that describe how a package is to be built and installed, and xbps-src is a shell script which can process these templates to actually carry out the work. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Ask HN: Areas in Programming to Avoid
    > Lisp looks like Python, that's far from C, and usually it's a "interpreted" language, far from machine the currently most popular Common Lisp implementation is based around an optimizing native code compiler. That compiler has its roots in the early 80s. See https://sbcl.org . It's far away from being 'interpreted'. - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Visual Studio App Center and Steel Bank Common Lisp, you can also consider the following products

TestFlight - iOS beta testing on the fly.

Hy - Hy is a wonderful dialect of Lisp that’s embedded in Python.

Setapp - Your shortcut to prime apps on Mac, an App Store alternative

CMU Common Lisp - CMUCL is a high-performance, free Common Lisp implementation.

Konfigure - APARTMENTS | VILLA | WORKSPACE | RETAIL

CLISP - CLISP is a portable ANSI Common Lisp implementation and development environment by Bruno Haible.