Visual Studio App Center VS Setapp

Appcenter will allow you to build your app for iOS and install on your device without submitting to the App Store. https://appcenter.ms/. Source: 10 months ago

We've been using app center for build distribution (https://appcenter.ms/). Source: 12 months ago

But, https://appcenter.ms/ and others like it are already available with generous free tiers and a lot more features (which you don't have to use, but can grow into), not to mention GitHub actions as others have noted. Does this advantages over existing, standard solutions? Source: 12 months ago

There are lots of choices. Google android device testing. Offhand https://appcenter.ms comes to mind. Source: about 1 year ago

You don t need a mac, use microsofts app center to build it. https://appcenter.ms. Source: over 1 year ago

But developers can actually enlist their apps in both of these "stores" (setapp is subscription based) which probably increases their potential revenue. [0]: https://setapp.com/. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago

In a lot of neighborhoods that's exactly what it does. Also, you can shop for iOS apps in other places, like https://setapp.com/. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago

Https://setapp.com is one example of a service that does bundling, albeit by offering what seems to be the full features of many things for a single subscription price (instead of your thought of a subset of features). It's not clear to me whether all of the apps offered are subscription-based, though. It's a model I'd be more willing to try than subscriptions to individual apps, although its OS and app offerings... - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago

I can't say that it's the best solution, but I use Nitro PDF from Setapp https://setapp.com/. Source: 11 months ago

There's also Sizzy (https://sizzy.co). It's available standalone, but it's also included with a Setapp subscription (https://setapp.com — Mac app subscription service). - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago