Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Usersnap VS Heroku CI

Compare Usersnap VS Heroku CI and see what are their differences

UserGuiding
Create in-app experiences with the most straightforward product adoption platform — quick implementation, lasting user engagement. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Usersnap logo Usersnap

Usersnap is a customer feedback software for SaaS companies that need to constantly improve and grow their products.

Heroku CI logo Heroku CI

Continuous Integration from Heroku
  • Usersnap Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-01-04

Usersnap is more than a platform to collect and manage feedback: we pave the road for customer-led growth. Usersnap helps digital products increase feedback interactions and gather insights on customer problems. How?

  • Feedback widgets with screen capture: makes your communication with users on complicated issues much easier.
  • Targeted microsurveys: boosts engagement and ensures precise insights for you to make decisions with evidence.
  • Intuitive dashboard and set up: saves time for non-tech savvy teams in research, testing and monitoring customer sentiment.
  • Community and conversations: get the collective VoC with community upvotes. Build real relationships with your users by replying to feedback through Usersnap or have a open discussion on the public Usersnap Board.

Usersnap empowers startups to agile enterprises to avoid failures and build products that matter, all with the clarity of customer feedback.

  • Heroku CI Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-14

Usersnap

Website
usersnap.com
Pricing URL
Official Usersnap Pricing
$ Details
paid Free Trial $69.0 / Monthly (10 team members, 5 feedback projects)
Platforms
Google Chrome Firefox Browser
Release Date
2020 January
Edit details

Heroku CI

Website
heroku.com
Pricing URL
-
$ Details
-
Platforms
-
Release Date
-
Edit details

Usersnap features and specs

  • Screen recording
  • Voice recording
  • Feedback widget
  • Feedback boards
  • Feedback & Commenting
  • Bug Tracking
  • Integrations
  • Feedback Collector
  • Flexible Pricing
  • NPS Widget
  • Customer Support
  • Customer Feedback Widget
  • Customer portal
  • Surveys

Heroku CI features and specs

  • Seamless Integration
    Heroku CI is tightly integrated with Heroku Pipelines, making it easy to deploy successfully tested builds directly into different stages, streamlining the deployment process.
  • Easy Setup
    Heroku CI provides a straightforward setup process, particularly for existing Heroku applications. This makes it accessible for teams who are already using Heroku for their application hosting.
  • Ephemeral Test Environments
    Heroku CI automatically provisions and tears down application environments for tests, ensuring a clean state for each test run and reducing the likelihood of false positives/negatives caused by environment differences.
  • Built-in Support for Multiple Languages
    Offers native support for a variety of programming languages supported by Heroku, allowing diverse teams to implement CI processes without additional configuration.
  • Parallel Test Execution
    Enables parallel execution of test suites, which can significantly reduce overall testing time and speed up the development and deployment cycles.

Possible disadvantages of Heroku CI

  • Cost
    Heroku CI can be expensive for teams or projects that require many CI environments or frequent builds, as it operates on Heroku's dyno cost model.
  • Limited Customization
    Compared to more robust CI/CD tools, Heroku CI offers less flexibility and customization options, which might be restrictive for complex build processes or unique testing requirements.
  • Integration Limitations
    While Heroku CI integrates well with Heroku Pipelines, it may not offer the same level of integration or support for other popular CI/CD tools and services, potentially complicating mixed-environment setups.
  • Performance Limitations
    The performance of the CI process is tied to the dyno types utilized in Heroku, and can be limited by the dyno configurations, impacting the speed and efficiency of running tests.
  • Dependency on Heroku Ecosystem
    Heroku CI is primarily beneficial if you are already using Heroku for deployment, which may not be suitable for teams relying on different cloud providers or those seeking vendor independence.

Usersnap videos

+ Add

Usersnap - Grow your product with the clarity of customer feedback

More videos:

  • Review - DEMO - Usersnap - add visual feedback superpowers to Jira Software - Optimize your development

Heroku CI videos

No Heroku CI videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Usersnap and Heroku CI)

Usersnap

Heroku CI

Customer Feedback
100 100%
Customer Feedback
0% 0
Continuous Integration
0 0%
Continuous Integration
100% 100
User Feedback
100 100%
User Feedback
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
Developer Tools
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Usersnap and Heroku CI. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Usersnap and Heroku CI

Usersnap Reviews

30 Best Customer Feedback Survey Tools: An Overview | Mopinion
Saber Feedback is very similar to UserSnap in that users can highlights issues on your website. The major difference is that the notes you take in this customer feedback tool are based more on highlighted elements and not using drawings or arrows. All notes created are saved as a screenshot which can be sent to you by email. Great for bugs and UX isses!
Source: mopinion.com
Top 10 Bug Tracking Tools for Web Developers and Designers
Usersnap is a bug tracking tool that offers maximum integration for project management tools like JIRA, Trello, Slack, Intercom and Zendesk. It gives web developers the advantage of a floating widget over the clouds to leave annotations placed above the webpage. Usersnap allows Java script responses and that makes it a most powerful tool for receiving bug reports from the...
Source: www.w2ssolutions.com

Heroku CI Reviews

We have no reviews of Heroku CI yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Usersnap seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 4 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Usersnap mentions (4)

Heroku CI mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Heroku CI yet. Tracking of Heroku CI recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Usersnap and Heroku CI, you can also consider the following products

BugHerd - BugHerd: The Website Feedback Tool for Agencies

CircleCI - CircleCI gives web developers powerful Continuous Integration and Deployment with easy setup and maintenance.

Marker.io - Visual feedback and bug reporting tool for websites

Nevercode - Continuous integration & delivery for mobile apps made easy. Build, test & release native & cross-platform apps faster with Nevercode. Sign up for free.

Hotjar - The #1 Leader in Heatmaps, Recordings, Surveys & More. Sign up for a 15-day free trial and start learning from real user behavior today!

Semaphore - Semaphore is a fully managed, high performance testing and deployment solution for your company. A Continuous Integration tool.

Loading...