Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Urho3D VS HaxeFlixel

Compare Urho3D VS HaxeFlixel and see what are their differences

Urho3D logo Urho3D

Urho3D is a lightweight, cross-platform rendering and game engine implemented in C++ and released...

HaxeFlixel logo HaxeFlixel

Create cross-platform games easier and free. All with one codebase.
  • Urho3D Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-24
  • HaxeFlixel Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-22

Urho3D videos

Urho3D/UrhoSharp -- The Others Game Engine Series

HaxeFlixel videos

No HaxeFlixel videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Urho3D and HaxeFlixel)
Game Development
62 62%
38% 38
Game Engine
66 66%
34% 34
3D Game Engine
58 58%
42% 42
Java
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Urho3D and HaxeFlixel. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Urho3D and HaxeFlixel

Urho3D Reviews

20 Best Scratch Alternatives 2023
Support for 3D development gives Urho3D a significant edge over Scratch for advanced programmers. Nevertheless, the platform is still highly reliable for creating 2D animations and games.
The Top 10 Video Game Engines
Urho3D also addresses its limitations, including the fact you’ll need skills in “C++ for performance-critical code and improving existing subsystems such as networking, physics, and animation, depending on your needs.” The brief limitations list is available in full on their site.

HaxeFlixel Reviews

We have no reviews of HaxeFlixel yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, HaxeFlixel should be more popular than Urho3D. It has been mentiond 9 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Urho3D mentions (5)

  • Godot support for 3D is too primitive, and Unity has become a wild mess over the years. Is Unreal Engine the only remaining option for 3D projects?
    You might give rbfx a look. It is an actively developed fork of Urho3D that has pretty decent, and actively developed, 3D rendering. Source: about 3 years ago
  • Best library for 3D development that doesn't require GLFW/GLAD etc
    You might give rbfx a try. It's a fork of Urho3D which is also good, though aging. While they do verge into engine territory, they're not editor-based as Unity and Godot are, and in fact the editors for each are quite rudimentary and unfinished. For a programming-centric workflow, they're pretty nice. Source: about 3 years ago
  • C++ 3D Graphics Frameworks / Game Frameworks ?
    Urho3D is a C++ engine that provides rendering (D3D, OpenGL, WebGL) as well as numerous other capabilities. Works on many platforms. Has and editor, but it is not central to the process and isn't really complete anyway. Source: over 3 years ago
  • C++ 2D/3D Engine
    Urho3D or its recent fork rbfx are good choices. Numerous supported platforms, 2D and 3D, scripting with AngelScript or Lua if desired, etc. Source: over 3 years ago
  • Workflows, Artisans, Manufactories and Inflation
    It's coded in C++, Urho3D is used to display graphics and sounds. Source: over 3 years ago

HaxeFlixel mentions (9)

  • Unity's Trap
    [HaxeFlixel](https://haxeflixel.com/) and [Defold](https://defold.com/) come to mind as lighter 2D-focused frameworks with web export options and published games. - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
  • Ask HN: Best stack to make a 2D game in 2023
    I've personally had a very good experience with Haxe and Haxeflixel (https://haxeflixel.com/) although Heaps (https://heaps.io/) seems to be more popular nowadays. Haxe is very nice as a language, can easily cross-compile to a lot of targets, Haxeflixel is heavily inspired by some Actionscript framework and has a lot of goodies. Maybe Heaps is more mature, up to date and allows for more advanced features. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • Game engine for programmars
    Older, maybe still fun to use Home | HaxeFlixel 2D Game Engine. Source: over 2 years ago
  • My mod RPG Overhaul is on hold! Please read this until the end
    So I decided to put it in my "things to do" list and start more simple on modding, like a simple full week mod or something. I started to learn C#) as I wanna develop games with Unity, and learning C# would also get more familiar with OOP and High-Level Programming Languages so then I can go back to Haxe (the language HaxeFlixel is built to work with) and understand it better. Source: over 2 years ago
  • What is a easy game programming language to start with?
    You can use it with https://haxeflixel.com/ or https://heaps.io/ for example. Source: almost 3 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Urho3D and HaxeFlixel, you can also consider the following products

Unreal Engine - Unreal Engine 4 is a suite of integrated tools for game developers to design and build games, simulations, and visualizations.

Godot Engine - Feature-packed 2D and 3D open source game engine.

RPG Maker - Make your own PC game with RPG Maker. Our easy to use tools are simple enough for a child, and powerful enough for a developer. Try it free today!

Unity - The multiplatform game creation tools for everyone.

MonoGame - MonoGame is an open source implementation of the Microsoft XNA 4 Framework.

GDevelop - GDevelop is an open-source game making software designed to be used by everyone.