Ulauncher VS exa app

Anyhow, I do prefer the Ulauncher over using the native GNOME launcher (probably has a different name like application menu, I mean the thing that opens once one clicks the super key). Source: almost 1 year ago

This problem is not unique to Tilix. I use the excellent Ulauncher tool. On X.org, Ulauncher opens on the monitor where the cursor is. On Wayland, it picks the monitor seemingly at random. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago

Ulauncher. You can also watch this video to see what it can do. Source: about 1 year ago

Https://ulauncher.io or https://extensions.gnome.org/extension/307/dash-to-dock/. Source: over 1 year ago

Ulauncher an application launcher for Applications. With numerous extensions. It's also not to difficult to write an extension, so you can customise it with your workflow. Source: over 1 year ago

It depends on the scale of the project but man, if you can't build a simple CRUD app in your preferred stack and deploy it in some fashion (even if it's just a binary posted on some website, kinda like Exa) then that's just disappointing... Source: 5 months ago

Can compile to a single binary to build tools like exa. Source: 7 months ago

Fish: A very fast shell with various customization options to streamline daily commands. I discovered it through this post by @caarlos0, where he provides more details about performance and the differences between fish and zsh. Additionally, I use some CLI utilities like delta, exa, and ripgrep. Here's my dotfiles for fish. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago

Hi! I use this: https://the.exa.website, and the package to this: https://archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/exa/. Source: 11 months ago

I still use exa for listing files in the terminal. It's a modern replacement for ls with a lot of useful features. With icons, colors, and git integration, it makes listing files much nicer. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago