Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Three.js VS Lax.js

Compare Three.js VS Lax.js and see what are their differences

3D Cityplanner
Transforming urban planning with smarter designs, data-driven decisions, and sustainable solutions for the cities of tomorrow. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Three.js logo Three.js

A JavaScript 3D library which makes WebGL simpler.

Lax.js logo Lax.js

Create beautiful & smooth animations when you scroll
  • Three.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-05-05
  • Lax.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-06

Three.js features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Three.js simplifies the complex task of 3D rendering with an intuitive API, making it accessible to developers who may not have deep expertise in 3D graphics.
  • Cross-Browser Compatibility
    Three.js is built upon WebGL, ensuring compatibility across modern browsers, including Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge.
  • Comprehensive Documentation
    The library offers extensive documentation, examples, and an active community, which helps in quickly resolving issues and understanding implementation.
  • Integration with HTML and CSS
    Three.js can be easily integrated with HTML and CSS, allowing for the blending of 2D and 3D elements in web applications.
  • Extensive Features
    It supports a wide range of features including cameras, lights, materials, shaders, and post-processing effects, making it highly versatile for various 3D projects.

Possible disadvantages of Three.js

  • Performance Overhead
    Despite its powerful capabilities, Three.js can have significant performance overhead, especially for complex scenes, which might require optimization.
  • Learning Curve
    While easier than raw WebGL, Three.js still has a learning curve, particularly for those new to 3D graphics, requiring time to become proficient.
  • Limited Built-in Advanced Tools
    Although feature-rich, Three.js lacks some advanced tools out-of-the-box compared to more specialized or industry-standard 3D engines, necessitating custom solutions for certain tasks.
  • Dependency on WebGL
    Three.js relies on WebGL, meaning it cannot be used in environments where WebGL is not supported, which can limit accessibility and compatibility.
  • Frequent Updates
    The library is actively developed, which is generally positive, but frequent updates can mean breaking changes, requiring developers to frequently refactor their code.

Lax.js features and specs

  • Lightweight
    Lax.js is a lightweight animation library, which means it doesn't add much to your project's file size, leading to faster load times compared to heavier animation libraries.
  • Ease of Use
    The library is designed with simplicity in mind, allowing developers to easily implement animations with minimal configuration and effort.
  • Smooth Animations
    Lax.js provides smooth, performant animations by leveraging CSS transforms and requestAnimationFrame, optimizing the animation process.
  • Customizability
    It offers a high degree of customizability, allowing developers to create a wide range of animations tailored to their specific needs.
  • Cross-Browser Compatibility
    Lax.js ensures that animations work consistently across different browsers, enhancing the user experience for a wider audience.

Possible disadvantages of Lax.js

  • Limited Features
    Compared to more extensive libraries like GSAP, Lax.js has a more limited set of features and capabilities, which might not be sufficient for complex animations.
  • Community Support
    The community and support around Lax.js might be smaller compared to more established libraries, potentially making it harder to find solutions and tutorials.
  • Scalability
    While great for small to medium projects, Lax.js might not scale well for very large projects that require extensive animation timelines and intricate interactions.
  • Documentation
    The documentation, while straightforward, may not be as comprehensive or detailed as that of more popular animation libraries, which can pose a challenge to new users.

Three.js videos

+ Add

Getting Started With Three.js

More videos:

  • Review - Ricardo Cabello (Mr doob) - 5 years of three.js

Lax.js videos

+ Add

Use Rellax.js to Create this Awesome Parallax Scrolling Effect

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Three.js and Lax.js)

Three.js

Lax.js

Javascript UI Libraries
100 100%
Javascript UI Libraries
0% 0
Animation
0 0%
Animation
100% 100
Flowcharts
100 100%
Flowcharts
0% 0
3D
0 0%
3D
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Three.js and Lax.js. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Three.js and Lax.js

Three.js Reviews

Top 20 Javascript Libraries
Cross-browser JS library and API that allows for the creation of beautiful animations, Three.js relies on WebGL rather than conventional browser-plugins. Through its library utilities, developers can include complex 3D animations on their website without much effort. Three.js include many features like geometry, lights, materials, shaders, effects, scenes, data loaders,...
Source: hackr.io

Lax.js Reviews

We have no reviews of Lax.js yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Three.js seems to be a lot more popular than Lax.js. While we know about 247 links to Three.js, we've tracked only 1 mention of Lax.js. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Three.js mentions (247)

  • Turn your phone into a wireless Joy-Con with SyncoPath
    The phone in the codepath sample got rendered using Three.js. For fun, I also added some beep sound generated using ZZfx when you tap. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • How to Build a Portfolio Website with React
    Also, to make your portfolio stand out to recruiters and clients, you can add some creative and interactive animations to it. The following libraries can help you easily do this: Framer Motion, tsParticles, and Three.js. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Rant: state of generative AI in code generation.
    In my experience with AI code generation, in visual projects like UI development or JavaScript based animation (using three.js or p5.js) etc. AI tools work pretty well. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • My son (9 yrs old) used plain JavaScript to make a game, and wants your feedback
    After he's done with v2, might I propose... THE GAMEY GAME 3D ?? https://threejs.org/ I started coding at 9 as well (which was a long time ago now), so I was very happy to play and see this today. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • Optimizing Three.js: 4 Key Techniques
    But code can also create something visually stunning, something everyone can appreciate. This is where tools like Three.js shine. However, Three.js can be heavy, especially when used in a dynamic web page accessed by devices with varying computational power. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
View more

Lax.js mentions (1)

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Three.js and Lax.js, you can also consider the following products

p5.js - JS library for creating graphic and interactive experiences

WOW.js - Animate elements on-scroll to catch attention. Such Magic.

PixiJS - Fast and flexible WebGL-based HTML5 game and app development library.

ScrollMagic - The jQuery plugin for magical scroll interactions.

Pixi.js - Fast lightweight 2D library that works across all devices

ScrollReveal - ScrollReveal is a tool to add scroll animations for web and mobile browsers.

Loading...