Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

PixiJS VS Lax.js

Compare PixiJS VS Lax.js and see what are their differences

3D Cityplanner
Transforming urban planning with smarter designs, data-driven decisions, and sustainable solutions for the cities of tomorrow. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

PixiJS logo PixiJS

Fast and flexible WebGL-based HTML5 game and app development library.

Lax.js logo Lax.js

Create beautiful & smooth animations when you scroll
  • PixiJS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-25
  • Lax.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-06

PixiJS features and specs

  • Performance
    PixiJS provides high performance through the use of WebGL, offering fast rendering capabilities that can handle complex scenes and animations efficiently.
  • Cross-Platform
    PixiJS is compatible with various platforms, including desktops, tablets, and mobile devices, ensuring a consistent experience across different environments.
  • Rich Features
    It comes with a variety of built-in features such as sprites, filters, masks, and support for different shapes and textures, which makes it powerful for creating interactive graphics.
  • Ease of Use
    The library offers a user-friendly API and extensive documentation, making it easy to learn and integrate into projects, even for developers who are new to WebGL.
  • Community Support
    PixiJS has an active community and a wealth of resources including forums, tutorials, and GitHub repositories, which help users troubleshoot issues and improve their projects.

Possible disadvantages of PixiJS

  • Size
    PixiJS can be relatively large in terms of file size, which may affect load times and performance, particularly for users with slow internet connections or limited bandwidth.
  • Browser Compatibility
    Since PixiJS relies heavily on WebGL, it may face compatibility issues with older browsers or devices that do not support advanced WebGL features.
  • Complexity
    While powerful, PixiJS can become complex when building more advanced applications, requiring a deep understanding of 3D graphics and WebGL concepts.
  • Limited 3D Support
    PixiJS is primarily a 2D rendering engine and lacks comprehensive support for 3D graphics, which might be a limitation for projects requiring 3D rendering.
  • Memory Management
    Handling memory efficiently can be challenging, especially in complex scenes with many textures and sprites, leading to potential memory leaks or performance degradation.

Lax.js features and specs

  • Lightweight
    Lax.js is a lightweight animation library, which means it doesn't add much to your project's file size, leading to faster load times compared to heavier animation libraries.
  • Ease of Use
    The library is designed with simplicity in mind, allowing developers to easily implement animations with minimal configuration and effort.
  • Smooth Animations
    Lax.js provides smooth, performant animations by leveraging CSS transforms and requestAnimationFrame, optimizing the animation process.
  • Customizability
    It offers a high degree of customizability, allowing developers to create a wide range of animations tailored to their specific needs.
  • Cross-Browser Compatibility
    Lax.js ensures that animations work consistently across different browsers, enhancing the user experience for a wider audience.

Possible disadvantages of Lax.js

  • Limited Features
    Compared to more extensive libraries like GSAP, Lax.js has a more limited set of features and capabilities, which might not be sufficient for complex animations.
  • Community Support
    The community and support around Lax.js might be smaller compared to more established libraries, potentially making it harder to find solutions and tutorials.
  • Scalability
    While great for small to medium projects, Lax.js might not scale well for very large projects that require extensive animation timelines and intricate interactions.
  • Documentation
    The documentation, while straightforward, may not be as comprehensive or detailed as that of more popular animation libraries, which can pose a challenge to new users.

PixiJS videos

+ Add

PixiJS Part 3: Renderer, Ticker, & Stage

More videos:

  • Review - Learn PixiJS in 20 Minutes

Lax.js videos

+ Add

Use Rellax.js to Create this Awesome Parallax Scrolling Effect

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to PixiJS and Lax.js)

PixiJS

Lax.js

Javascript UI Libraries
100 100%
Javascript UI Libraries
0% 0
Animation
0 0%
Animation
100% 100
Flowcharts
100 100%
Flowcharts
0% 0
3D
0 0%
3D
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using PixiJS and Lax.js. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, PixiJS seems to be a lot more popular than Lax.js. While we know about 72 links to PixiJS, we've tracked only 1 mention of Lax.js. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

PixiJS mentions (72)

  • Trying to Replace the DOM with Canvas — And Failing
    To improve performance, another team built a POC replacing standard DOM elements with a canvas managed by a library called pixi.js. The idea was to boost rendering speed. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • Building an AI Powered Camera for David Bowie
    We can now decide how we want to display the data.image result back to our user. You can simply throw it up in an tag or generate a reveal video on the fly like I’ve done using Pixi.JS and MediaRecorder. Perhaps a topic for another dev blog. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Tattooing The Black Keys Fans Using MediaDevices and PixiJS
    For this application, we gain access to the user’s camera using MediaDevices and then place it onto a PixiJS canvas as a video sprite. Then, we load the tattoo as an additional sprite and give it a bit of opacity and blending to bleed it into the user’s skin. Simple controls are added to allow the user to rotate, scale, and position the tattoo for the perfect inking. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Chapter 1: Boring SVG Manipulation
    And canvas felt almost natural and invoked heavy nostalgia from the first time I touched keyboard and wrote primitive program to draw a house out of lines utilizing Basic. Later on I had a chance to broaden my expertise, when I was doing my hobby game project with Pixi and small bits and pieces on FindLabs pages. - Source: dev.to / 12 months ago
  • JSON Canvas – An open file format for infinite canvas data
    The canvas in Obsidian is as the whole app very well made. I wondered what they are using as well. My guess is https://www.xyflow.com/, which is for drawing nodes. More general purpose would be http://fabricjs.com/. Or very low level https://pixijs.com/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
View more

Lax.js mentions (1)

What are some alternatives?

When comparing PixiJS and Lax.js, you can also consider the following products

Three.js - A JavaScript 3D library which makes WebGL simpler.

WOW.js - Animate elements on-scroll to catch attention. Such Magic.

Phaser - Desktop and Mobile HTML5 game framework. A fast, free and fun open source framework for Canvas and WebGL powered browser games.

ScrollMagic - The jQuery plugin for magical scroll interactions.

Paper.js - Open source vector graphics scripting framework that runs on top of the HTML5 Canvas.

ScrollReveal - ScrollReveal is a tool to add scroll animations for web and mobile browsers.

Loading...